Laws and individual rights have nothing to do with feelings. Seriously if some one refused me service I would totally GO SOMEWHERE ELSE! This world is full of pussies who think that everything is about feelings. I'm not claiming your guilty of that but thats how people make decisions.
Let someone deny you service on just the color of your skin and then tell me you feel the same...typical
It has happened and I don't give a flying you know what. Do you live in a large city? Well I will tell you there are some bars out there that were less then friendly to white when I was a kid. I didn't give a FU*& I just moved on and most the time laughed about it.
typical..let me know when you have a clue what real discrimination is...maybe ask your wife being a woman she might have a better understanding....ask her what if she walked in a restaurant and the owner said I don't serve bitches...let me know what she would do and say...go ahead ask her..again you typical
I wonder if the supreme court would be fair and across the board or decide it based on what was on the shirt or such.
[/quote]
If Osama had changed, I doubt anyone would of thought differently about him. I know about him, I don't see him as a good role model though.
In one more complicated case, a court held that a cemetery could exclude punk rockers from a private funeral service. A mother requested that the funeral service for her 17-year-old daughter be private and that admission to the service be limited to family and invited guests only. The cemetery failed to exclude punk rockers from the service. The punk rockers arrived in unconventional dress, wearing makeup and sporting various hair colors. One was wearing a dress decorated with live rats. Others wore leather and chains, some were twirling baton-like weapons, drinking, and using cocaine. The punk rockers made rude comments to family members and were generally disruptive of the service.
Getting upset or hurt isn't the definition of discrimination. There are entire college grants and scholarships that more or less have a openly 'no whites' sign on them. The government OKs that. Why? Excluding people based on race, religion, sex, ect is discrimination. Why is it ok for some parts of the government and some organizations to be discriminatory and not others? Its ok for an organization to give black kids thousands of dollars and go out of their way to exclude whites but it isn't ok to only allow white people into a store/business? I fail to see the actual difference. You might say it is for fairness, but if that was the case then the grants and scholarships would be based on income only.
Are you really trying to compare Osama to Malcom??? really??? are you really sure you know anything about Malcom X...at a time when blacks were made to feel inferior to whites Malcom X showed black self-determination, self defense, knowledge, and the understanding of change..Funny how some whites feel its OK to rape,murder,beat.and deny basic human rights to others, but when others start fighting back poor white person what to scream foul and start the slander scandel...I suggest you go do some reading on MalcomX.... I feel his years after his trip to Mecca shows exactly what a role model should be...oh by the way can you show me one example of Malcom X as a terrorist...
I think once again you missed the point... not serving a woman based on the fact that she is female is discrimination...I used calling her a bitch to add a little sting to the insult..
Osama blew up the twin towers because he believed it was necessary to end the oppression of the middle east by the west. Malcom X said "by any means necessary" and meant that if needed to serve the cause you should do whatever was necessary. The IRA did the whole 'by any means necessary' too. They were labeled terrorists. The only difference was Malcom X never was caught doing anything. Malcom X openly said terrorism was an acceptable means to gain the end. I am not saying I would not resort to terrorism if necessary - but I would be labeled as a terrorist. Malcom X is no difference. He was one explosion away from being a McVeigh. If you kill for a just reason or a injust reason, you still become a killer. Osama never actually killed people, he just promoted it. Manson never physically killed anyone, he just promoted it. What is the difference between those actions and that of Malcom X?
I own my businesses so what you saying is BS point blank...My business is open to all unless you drunk or naked ( a naked emergency is allowed and clothes can be provided ). The argument that would allow people to not allow others into their business "just because" is a lost cause with me...makes me look at that person alot different
..take a break from scanning at Wal Mart and venture out
Ron Paul would be against the civil rights vote of 64..out his own mouth...now his reasoning I say is still BS and stand against it as a business owner..now is he a racist don't know don't care ...will not vote for him as POTUS to find out...his idea along that a business owner could allow racism ( on both sides in this day and age) say HELL NO...but I like that he would let us all get high...but sorry not enough...continue if you must but it only get worst...now on a peaceful note follow Malcom after his journey to Mecca ...and again you never showed any proof on Malcom be a terriost...lot of words it writes but hmmmm no proof...FAILED