BBYY
Well-Known Member
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/25/jose-guerena-arizona-_n_867020.html?ncid=webmail
I know being a ex-member of the US armed forces on how much muscle memory never fades.
This man survived 2 tours in Iraq.
He was defending his Child and spouse.
Yet bleeds out and dies after being shot more than 60 times.
I know Geneva convention and laws of war when fighting in conflict is you cannot turn back around to kill or even mercy killing and that you have to provide aid once the assailant has been disarmed. Shooting someone 60 times, in my book is properly disarming them, and once you put your weapon back on safety you cannot re-engaged a disarmed target unless he was to become armed again. I have seen first hand a enemy try to kill one of us, get hit, but then US having to medivac him out and provide medical treatment to him at OUR expense. I am sure the treatment is to maintain vitals and control bleeding, hopefully no morphine BUT why is the local authorities here in America not held liable for that they do, and how come they have no LAWS in this matter of giving care to a wounded subject after he or she is not longer a threat?
These SWAT agents are supposed to be highly trained in CQC, Which means controlled pairs, aiming at center body mass. a 5.56 round typically does not go straight threw, but yet ricochets around the body causing sever internal bleeding. 70 shots is more than 2 magazines, Meaning these 7 agents did about 10 double taps each. Regardless, he was gonna be killed with just 14 rounds going in him. That EMT would have never been able to save his life, but thats not the point. The actions of these officials in the following days does no justice to the conspiracy of this being covered up.
This really makes me sad, I guess I wanted to vent and bring this story to the attention of the few who might not of read it otherwise.
Thanks for reading
I know being a ex-member of the US armed forces on how much muscle memory never fades.
This man survived 2 tours in Iraq.
He was defending his Child and spouse.
Yet bleeds out and dies after being shot more than 60 times.
I know Geneva convention and laws of war when fighting in conflict is you cannot turn back around to kill or even mercy killing and that you have to provide aid once the assailant has been disarmed. Shooting someone 60 times, in my book is properly disarming them, and once you put your weapon back on safety you cannot re-engaged a disarmed target unless he was to become armed again. I have seen first hand a enemy try to kill one of us, get hit, but then US having to medivac him out and provide medical treatment to him at OUR expense. I am sure the treatment is to maintain vitals and control bleeding, hopefully no morphine BUT why is the local authorities here in America not held liable for that they do, and how come they have no LAWS in this matter of giving care to a wounded subject after he or she is not longer a threat?
These SWAT agents are supposed to be highly trained in CQC, Which means controlled pairs, aiming at center body mass. a 5.56 round typically does not go straight threw, but yet ricochets around the body causing sever internal bleeding. 70 shots is more than 2 magazines, Meaning these 7 agents did about 10 double taps each. Regardless, he was gonna be killed with just 14 rounds going in him. That EMT would have never been able to save his life, but thats not the point. The actions of these officials in the following days does no justice to the conspiracy of this being covered up.
This really makes me sad, I guess I wanted to vent and bring this story to the attention of the few who might not of read it otherwise.
Thanks for reading