even more Odd that you don't read the original post in a thread that you post so much on. (or even watch the videos)
Oh you mean the one that says in super bold print Ron Paul is not a racist because Ron Paul said he's not a racist! Yeah, read that. While that is a compelling argument I'm going to go ahead and look at Ron Paul's total body of work rather than just blindly believe every statement coming from someone who's running for president.
Here's how I see it.
On one side you have:
Ron Paul - Anti emancipation proclamation, anti civil rights ammendment, thinks the north was wrong to fight the civil war, publishes a racist newsletter in his name that appears to be written by him in the first person that he's defended in the past, and against MLK's birthday as a holiday.
on the other side you have Ron Paul saying "I'm not a racist"
You have to really be sippin the koolaide to ignore all the evidence and instead just take his word for it.
Did you believe Nixon when he said "I'm not a crook". After all, he said it so we must ignore everything else and believe him right?