chiefchuckles
New Member
Yeah, your wrong on the flushing.
Thanks for your evidence and open mind. Your proof is undeniable and your wisdom is much greater. Happy Growing.Yeah, your wrong on the flushing.
Each to their own.Yeah, your wrong on the flushing.
Point taken Nothingreallymatters. Technically I use Dyna-Gro in hydro and change out my nutes once/week. What I think is being discussed about the flushing myth is giving
plants no nutes at all for up to 2 weeks, not simply refreshing your growing media/regimen. But I would say plants would do better w/a 2 week flush in soil vs hydro.
I heard about 2 other possible myths: Tilling/breaking up the soil before starting new plants & the over fertilization myth (both looking into). I heard about the "tilling myth"
decades ago and how even colonists wasted a bunch of time and effort tilling the soil and it actually being counter productive for their crops.
Oh, and also to add another myth I found today: sunlight is magnified by the water drop on the leaf to cause a leaf burn. This is only true for hairy type leaves and when
the sun is low on the horizon. To this day I've yelled at my bro for doing this outside. Still I heard it's best to water after sunset or before sunrise, though watering during the
day may not be a death sentence for the plant.
See that "unflushed" bud there? That ash is from it not being dried and cured properly, come on people, anyone thats grown more than twice knows "that stage" of the drying process. Tastes like hay, smells like hay mixed with weed, rough feeling on the throat, doesnt grind well, clumps together...2 weeks in a mason jar and those same buds are beautiful, clear burning, taste, smell, high and smoothness all perfect. The colour even changes slightly.Well, actually I do flush. But not the last 2 weeks. I do it 16 times during my 16 week/4 month grow cycle in hydro. So I win 16-2.
Here's some myth propagation (or is it misinformation?):
[video=youtube;9sr58DBJ0Dw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sr58DBJ0Dw&feature=related[/video]
Chelation occurs regardless of any label like 'synthetic' in regards to nutrients. Chelation is by necessity 'organic'. Chelation occurs when (cat)ionic nutrients are bound with an organic acid. Either it occurs prior to a plant uptaking it, or if not, the plant will produce amino acids and chelate the nutrients at a cellular level before use and before it is able to transport the nutrients to other tissue or to a different part of the plant. In hydroponics, cationic nutrients are chelated with something like leonardite (which is the organic humic acid, aka coal, aka ancient decayed trees and plants, aka as 'organic' as you can get) which prevents them from dropping out of solution and also removes the need for the plant to chelate the nutrients at a cellular level. In soil, microbes provide most of the organic acid and chelate the nutrients. It's all the same nutrients, it's all 'organic', and there's no chemical difference in the nutrients found in the plants tissues.I was talking out of my ass there.. Ive grown hydro my whole life using the same synthetic nutrients.. i agree completly same nutrients and minerals only derived and introduced differently. maybe the chleating agents make a difference.. ive heard some can be petroleum based..?? ive never tested the theory. flushing makes a difference in hydro and ill leave it alone