For a man that has a Master's in anything, your grammar is atrocious. Normally I wouldn't even care about something so trivial, but someone as educated as you claim to be should know better. Now that I've gotten that off my chest, moving on...
Second, anyone who has a degree founded in any form of science should have no trouble explaining why they have done no research into the useful wavelengths for photosynthesis. So, why haven't you? If you had the slightest inkling about lighting, you would know that "these lights are roughly,to the naked eye, as bright as 600w hps at a glance." means absolutely nothing relevant to your plants. You have shown nothing resembling proof. You get defensive when people express doubt, instead of proving your statements of how awesome this light is. Show me a well documented grow vs. a 600w, under the same conditions, where it blows that 600w away. If you have a degree in any science, get your money back. Because they clearly never taught you how to back your claims with facts. Evidence, not claims, is what you should be using here.
Edit: I realize this comes accross as harsh. However, you have to understand that the moment you made a claim to a Master's in Health Sciences; you also made the fact that you failed to post anything empirical here, while singing it's praises, a rather glaring issue. At least for as qualified of an individual as you.