Obama: "I think same sex couples should be abe to get married

Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
washington, oregon, california, nevada, colorado, new mexico, minnesota, iowa, illinois, wisconsin, main, vermont, new york, new jersey, massachusetts, connecticut, rhode island, maryland, and hawaii all ban discrimination based on sexual orientation. by the way, it's "you're". as in, you are on the wrong side of history, old geezer.
Click to expand...
By the way, I know when to use capital letters. You want to pick on spelling? Who YOU calling "old". I knew you would have that info on post-it notes stuck to your monitor. Should have stuck the legal ordinances up there, too. Snicker.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
By the way, I know when to use capital letters. You want to pick on spelling? Who YOU calling "old". I knew you would have that info on post-it notes stuck to your monitor. Should have stuck the legal ordinances up there, too. Snicker.
Click to expand...
i know when to use capital letters too. But I generally don't bother.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Yep. I could still live with the partner of my choice. AND we could procreate. Is "marie of romania" a historical reference? Or Should we start calling you Marie?
Click to expand...
Dorothy Parker

Comment

Oh, life is a glorious cycle of song,
A medley of extemporanea;
And love is a thing that can never go wrong;
And I am Marie of Roumania.


Figure out the poem yourself.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
so other people are getting benefits that you don't based on your sexual orientation, and you're calling it equal still? do elaborate.
Click to expand...
It was a yes or no question. I said "yes". It's based on marital status, not "sexual orientation".
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
It was a yes or no question. I said "yes". It's based on marital status, not "sexual orientation".
Click to expand...
and that marital status which enables the benefits is directly contingent upon sexual orientation.

you senile today? forget to take your alzheimer pills?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
and that marital status which enables the benefits is directly contingent upon sexual orientation. you senile today? forget to take your alzheimer pills?
Click to expand...
Name calling again. Marital status is NOT contingent upon sexual orientation. They don't even ask. When you got married, did they ask you? O.K. Maybe they did ask you, but you still got married. You state something totally untrue and think somehow you've made some masterful stroke of genius. Your having delusions of adequacy.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Name calling again. Marital status is NOT contingent upon sexual orientation.
Click to expand...
funny, my gay friends would love to marry but they aren't allowed.

you're reverting back to the old "homosexuality doesn't exist" argument.

basically you're saying if gays want equal rights, all they have to do is be straight. just like if slave wanted to be free, all they had to do was paint themselves white.

when i call you retarded now, it is not an insult, it is a description of the logic you rely on.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
funny, my gay friends would love to marry but they aren't allowed. you're reverting back to the old "homosexuality doesn't exist" argument. basically you're saying if gays want equal rights, all they have to do is be straight. just like if slave wanted to be free, all they had to do was paint themselves white. when i call you retarded now, it is not an insult, it is a description of the logic you rely on.
Click to expand...
You're gay friends are allowed to marry. Your putting words in my mouth and trying to argue what I never said. Retard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top