A tax analogy, who's really paying their fair share?

InCognition said:
Yup, he got called out again.

Surprising right? LOL.
Click to expand...

InCognition said:
LOL. He gets called out once again.

Ironic isn't it, how he calls people cowards when he can't even admit his wrongs?
Click to expand...

InCognition said:
And you do make sense? LOL.

You've been called out so many times now on this thread, it's not even funny. I will still LOL to that though.
Click to expand...

InCognition said:
None.

LOL.
Click to expand...

lying, thieving, mooching, homicidal grade school kiddo.
 
UncleBuck said:
lying, thieving, mooching, homicidal grade school kiddo.
Click to expand...

Called out, with nothing to say. Surprise... a grown ass, man-bitch, none the less.

Man up, bitch... it's about that time. LOL.

By the way, your quotes in reference to what you said, makes absolutely no sense, wackjob. You off your meds? The government check come late this month? LOL.
 
UncleBuck said:
sounds like the psycho is mad.

sorry i keep proving you wrong, it's too irresistible.
Click to expand...

LOL. You proving me wrong? You mean how you're proved wrong all over this forum? What exactly have I been "wrong" on... a typo (thanks for correcting me by the way, lol)?

You were wrong on your very own taxes, LOL. Your ignorance is on a level of it's own.

Check yourself. You're the one who believes in incomputable math, which is the epitome of wrong. Don't get what I'm talking about? Don't ask, you're too far off in the yonder.
 
InCognition said:
LOL. You proving me wrong? You mean how you're proved wrong all over this forum? What exactly have I been "wrong" on... a typo (thanks for correcting me by the way, lol)?

You were wrong on your very own taxes, LOL. Your ignorance is on a level of it's own.

Check yourself. You're the one who believes in incomputable math, which is the epitome of wrong. Don't get what I'm talking about? Don't ask, you're too far off in the yonder.
Click to expand...

you're going psycho tonight.

you were wrong when you presumed my tax rate.

you were wrong when you said you never called me out.

i posted the solid evidence to prove it.

get fucked, kiddo.
 
UncleBuck said:
you're going psycho tonight.

UncleBuck said:
you were wrong when you presumed my tax rate.
Click to expand...

I never presumed your tax rate. I simply said your "guess" of your very own tax rate is flat-out-wrong, which it was.

UncleBuck said:
you were wrong when you said you never called me out.
Click to expand...

So I was wrong when I never called you out? You want to call me on typos but apparently don't understand English grammar or sentence structure. Take a look at that sentence again, then you can call me out on some more typos. LOL.

UncleBuck said:
i posted the solid evidence to prove it.
Click to expand...

Sure was "solid" evidence. LOL. Lets say it was solid evidence... the tax percentage you proclaimed was still wrong. You really can't be fucking serious right? Some evidence that was...

"beenthere"trashed you on your own taxes. That's a LOLLOLOLx9.

You don't even know your own tax rate buddy, when you proclaim to be a know-it-all "I know what my taxes are, this shit is unfair" specialist. It's hilarious.

UncleBuck said:
get fucked, kiddo.
Click to expand...

So you're mad or what? No you get fucked? lol....
Click to expand...
 
Harrekin said:
No, apparently he just wants to be trolled.
Click to expand...

i mean, he called me out for not posting my taxes, and i posted them quite clearly.

then he goes on to talk about killing the poor and killing anyone who wants to support the poor in an organized fashion.

i mean, i could understand voting against helping the poor schemes i disagree with, but to kill the people who support them and benefit from them "righteously"?

that kid is psycho and needs major help.
 
UncleBuck said:
i mean, he called me out for not posting my taxes, and i posted them quite clearly.

then he goes on to talk about killing the poor and killing anyone who wants to support the poor in an organized fashion.

i mean, i could understand voting against helping the poor schemes i disagree with, but to kill the people who support them and benefit from them "righteously"?

that kid is psycho and needs major help.
Click to expand...

I suppose it really depends why theyre poor tho.

If they're poor through laziness leave them in the gutter, if they're poor cos they lost their job, etc they should be supported cos they paid into the system.

Cest n'agreeable??
 
Harrekin said:
I suppose it really depends why theyre poor tho.

If they're poor through laziness leave them in the gutter, if they're poor cos they lost their job, etc they should be supported cos they paid into the system.

Cest n'agreeable??
Click to expand...

*n'est pas agreeable?

yes, it's agreeable. but my outlook and yours is not to take joy at seeing someone die in the gutter, like incognition. people like you and i with empathy and a heart only want to see them resigned to their life choice. some mechanism, whether by government (of, for, and by the people) or by the people alone, should still ensure they are given the basic dignities of food, clothing, and shelter.

not to mention, many people "in the gutter" end up there not by their own choice and action, but by circumstances beyond their control. it would probably be a wise thing to make sure that those who truly need it have a lifeline to upward mobility and basic healthcare so that they don't die and can make it back to the middle class or even kjust the working poor. in your country, those costs are socialized by the government and everyone pays less per capita. in our country, those costs are socialized by private entities that pass along the cost of deadbeats like incognition onto the rest of the responsible people.

and super agreeable on the part about those who simply lost their job and who have paid into the system. those people should not have to suffer just because they were made subject to the whims of a hostile employer.
 
beenthere said:
No need to wait Bucky, show us all that tax return where you paid 25% on $35k a year!
You're not waiting in hope this thread fades away, are you? LMAO
Click to expand...

He is probably including his social security and medicare tax and can't take his exemption because it is taken on his mommy's return.
 
haight said:
He is probably including his social security and medicare tax and can't take his exemption because it is taken on his mommy's return.
Click to expand...

Yep, your whole sentence is correct.

Buck has said his taxes would be less, if he wasn't falling on the sword for his wife.
 
kelly4 said:
Yep, your whole sentence is correct.

Buck has said his taxes would be less, if he wasn't falling on the sword for his wife.
Click to expand...
So you like taxes then?

Why should Buck not try keep as much money as he can to "redistribute" as he feels fit? He's paying roughly the same as the rest of you and not claiming anything.

You may not agree with his viewpoint, and he may have made a mistake about the effective tax rate, but not everyone has been self employed and we're not all born tax geniuses ;)

I mean for a lefty at least he only wants parity in taxes across the scale, not to rape the rich at 90%.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top