UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's more like you. i posted proof, kiddo.
planning on a new grow to hide from mommy and daddy now that your 4 month endeavor has netted you a few grams?
A tax analogy, who's really paying their fair share?
- Thread starter beenthere
- Start date
planning on a new grow to hide from mommy and daddy now that your 4 month endeavor has netted you a few grams?
InCognition
Active Member
I know I got your feathers ruffled when you repeat yourself 15+ times. LOL.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you think you got my feathers ruffled? you fell into a trap that i laid.
pat yourself on the back for that one, kiddo.
InCognition
Active Member
Patting now.
Saying you set a trap, just because your feathers are ruffled? Good one. LOL.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
InCognition
Active Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
lying, thieving, mooching, homicidal grade school kiddo.
InCognition
Active Member
Called out, with nothing to say. Surprise... a grown ass, man-bitch, none the less.
Man up, bitch... it's about that time. LOL.
By the way, your quotes in reference to what you said, makes absolutely no sense, wackjob. You off your meds? The government check come late this month? LOL.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
sounds like the psycho is mad.
sorry i keep proving you wrong, it's too irresistible.
InCognition
Active Member
LOL. You proving me wrong? You mean how you're proved wrong all over this forum? What exactly have I been "wrong" on... a typo (thanks for correcting me by the way, lol)?
You were wrong on your very own taxes, LOL. Your ignorance is on a level of it's own.
Check yourself. You're the one who believes in incomputable math, which is the epitome of wrong. Don't get what I'm talking about? Don't ask, you're too far off in the yonder.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you're going psycho tonight.
you were wrong when you presumed my tax rate.
you were wrong when you said you never called me out.
i posted the solid evidence to prove it.
get fucked, kiddo.
InCognition
Active Member
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
No, apparently he just wants to be trolled.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i mean, he called me out for not posting my taxes, and i posted them quite clearly.
then he goes on to talk about killing the poor and killing anyone who wants to support the poor in an organized fashion.
i mean, i could understand voting against helping the poor schemes i disagree with, but to kill the people who support them and benefit from them "righteously"?
that kid is psycho and needs major help.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
I suppose it really depends why theyre poor tho.
If they're poor through laziness leave them in the gutter, if they're poor cos they lost their job, etc they should be supported cos they paid into the system.
Cest n'agreeable??
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
*n'est pas agreeable?
yes, it's agreeable. but my outlook and yours is not to take joy at seeing someone die in the gutter, like incognition. people like you and i with empathy and a heart only want to see them resigned to their life choice. some mechanism, whether by government (of, for, and by the people) or by the people alone, should still ensure they are given the basic dignities of food, clothing, and shelter.
not to mention, many people "in the gutter" end up there not by their own choice and action, but by circumstances beyond their control. it would probably be a wise thing to make sure that those who truly need it have a lifeline to upward mobility and basic healthcare so that they don't die and can make it back to the middle class or even kjust the working poor. in your country, those costs are socialized by the government and everyone pays less per capita. in our country, those costs are socialized by private entities that pass along the cost of deadbeats like incognition onto the rest of the responsible people.
and super agreeable on the part about those who simply lost their job and who have paid into the system. those people should not have to suffer just because they were made subject to the whims of a hostile employer.
haight
Well-Known Member
He is probably including his social security and medicare tax and can't take his exemption because it is taken on his mommy's return.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
Yep, your whole sentence is correct.
Buck has said his taxes would be less, if he wasn't falling on the sword for his wife.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
So you like taxes then?
Why should Buck not try keep as much money as he can to "redistribute" as he feels fit? He's paying roughly the same as the rest of you and not claiming anything.
You may not agree with his viewpoint, and he may have made a mistake about the effective tax rate, but not everyone has been self employed and we're not all born tax geniuses
I mean for a lefty at least he only wants parity in taxes across the scale, not to rape the rich at 90%.