UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
point out the logical fallacy or shut the fuck up clayton.You're using the Jon Stewart show to argue your point, really? LOL
we know how much you don't like the darkies, are the jews on your list as well?
point out the logical fallacy or shut the fuck up clayton.You're using the Jon Stewart show to argue your point, really? LOL
I think 50-60k a year for teachers is a fair wage. But I also think they should contribute more to their own health and retirement benefits, especially in a down economy. I don't know about the Chicago teachers union, but here in California, the teachers retirement benefits are calculated by their two highest years of pay. Knowing this, most of them will get raises and work overtime their last two years to inflate their retirement benefits. That's fucking BS.Why do you think teachers shouldn't make 50-60k a year? Is their job not that important?
I think 50-60k a year for teachers is a fair wage. But I also think they should contribute more to their own health and retirement benefits, especially in a down economy. I don't know about the Chicago teachers union, but here in California, the teachers retirement benefits are calculated by their two highest years of pay. Knowing this, most of them will get raises and work overtime their last two years to inflate their retirement benefits. That's fucking BS.
Oh shit... I agree with you about something. WTF IS GOING ON. I'm scared.....I think 50-60k a year for teachers is a fair wage. But I also think they should contribute more to their own health and retirement benefits, especially in a down economy. I don't know about the Chicago teachers union, but here in California, the teachers retirement benefits are calculated by their two highest years of pay. Knowing this, most of them will get raises and work overtime their last two years to inflate their retirement benefits. That's fucking BS.
I also agree with this. CEO's do nothing that special for the company except make decisions that will inevitably cost someone their job. There is no legit reason one person needs to be making 15 million a year. Same goes for athletes. The cost we pay for fame is disgusting.I think 269k is plenty for CEOs and they should pay for their own benefits as well.
i think $45k with no benefits is a fair wage for a carpenter, let's write it into law.I think 269k is plenty for CEOs and they should pay for their own benefits as well.
Major difference, teachers are paid by you and I, so we should have a say in it.Oh shit... I agree with you about something. WTF IS GOING ON. I'm scared.....
It's the dreads bro!
I also agree with this. CEO's do nothing that special for the company except make decisions that will inevitably cost someone their job. There is no legit reason one person needs to be making 15 million a year. Same goes for athletes. The cost we pay for fame is disgusting.
So Parents shouldn't be the ones in charge of their own children? There is someone better to be the parent? Who would this be? Do they know how expensive it is to raise kids?Parents should not have the free range to do things like pull their kids out of science classes when the chapter on evolution comes around, if they feel that way, they should be required to home school their kid or put them in private school. Parents should not have the option to protest grades their kids receive on assignments or in the class. You get what you earn, if you want something better, do better.
Ohhh Can I be an equal slave too?i think $45k with no benefits is a fair wage for a carpenter, let's write it into law.
nurses only get $33k, but they get benefits.
and doctors should only get $75k a year max, by law.
what sayeth you, clayton?
Well I don't think the problem is primarily the fault of big business, I blame the governments involvement in it. Your want for big government dirties your hands IMO.basically your views on economics allows you to wash your hands of it
It's capitalism at it's finest. Quite sad really but what are you gonna do about it, beenthere is right. It's private so technically speaking the Govt. can't/shouldn't put caps on it. It creates a huge grey area if they do cap it and it is an even bigger grey area if they don't. It's the, dammed if you do dammed if you don't type deal.basically your views on economics allows you to wash your hands of it,
just seems backwards . . . .idk, my own feeligns about money and priorities within a society make me biased
Oh shit... I agree with you about something. WTF IS GOING ON. I'm scared.....
I also agree with this. CEO's do nothing that special for the company except make decisions that will inevitably cost someone their job. There is no legit reason one person needs to be making 15 million a year. Same goes for athletes. The cost we pay for fame is disgusting.
Well I don't think the problem is primarily the fault of big business, I blame the governments involvement in it. Your want for big government dirties your hands IMO.
Great idea, as long as the teacher pays the student if the student can't perform. Gotta keep it fair, no special privileges.I am being absurd. CEO's should certainly get a percentage of the earnings of the company they captain. But a part of those earnings are what a competent person bargains for as compensation. Beenthere is claiming that they shouldn't be allowed to ask for or bargain for what they think is a fair wage.
If we look at this compensation in the same way we look at the compensation of a CEO, then each teacher should receive a portion of every student's income when he goes to work as a portion of what that working student brings to the table of his employ is a result of how well (or poorly) each teacher does his job.
Beenthere would not be upset about this because the teacher is now no longer getting much from the tax payer.
if we all follow clayton's cue, we can all be equal slaves, earning only what a racist douche on the internet deems to be fair!Ohhh Can I be an equal slave too?
Great idea, as long as the teacher pays the student if the student can't perform. Gotta keep it fair, no special privileges.
I know you guys will disagree, but IMO, big business by itself would never be the monopoly we all loathe. When government implements regulations that smaller companies cannot afford to financially comply with, only the big corporations go on.It's capitalism at it's finest. Quite sad really but what are you gonna do about it, beenthere is right. It's private so technically speaking the Govt. can't/shouldn't put caps on it. It creates a huge grey area if they do cap it and it is an even bigger grey area if they don't. It's the, dammed if you do dammed if you don't type deal.
I know you guys will disagree, but IMO, big business by itself would never be the monopoly we all loathe. When government implements regulations that smaller companies cannot afford to financially comply with, only the big corporations go on.
That would be true IF big business didn't lobby the shit out of congressmen/women to get these regulations passed that allow them more freedom and in turn crush small business.I know you guys will disagree, but IMO, big business by itself would never be the monopoly we all loathe. When government implements regulations that smaller companies cannot afford to financially comply with, only the big corporations go on.