ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Deflecting nothingCan you defend the actions of Israel at all or simply continue to deflect?
Two wrongs dont make a right
Didn't your parents teach you that?
Deflecting nothingCan you defend the actions of Israel at all or simply continue to deflect?
This ingenious maneuver to ignore suffering is what is wrong more than anything. I didn't learn about suffering from my parents, I learned it as an occupier of Iraq.Deflecting nothing
Two wrongs dont make a right
Didn't your parents teach you that?
It's a bad situation. One box, two cats. This will be decided on the field of Arm-a-kitten. cnIt hasn't been within lightyears of what the west is guilty of.
Now before I am berated for using the very tactic I criticized Chesus for using, I have to point out that I am trying to overcome the nearly universal viewpoint that "Israel is defending itself from terrorists".The west as well would have the world believe it is defending its existence from terrorists hellbent on destroying her way of life, out of hatred for her freedoms.
This is why I am sick of having people remind me to fairly insult Hamas along with the Israeli occupiers of Palestine.
There are no "good guys". There are aggressors and victims. Fighting back against aggression is not terrorism. The terrorist's weapon of choice is the drone.
It is sad to watch for those of us who care.It's a bad situation. One box, two cats. This will be decided on the field of Arm-a-kitten. cn
Doesn't seem like he's ignoring anything.This ingenious maneuver to ignore suffering is what is wrong more than anything. I didn't learn about suffering from my parents, I learned it as an occupier of Iraq.
He isn't doing anything wrong, he is expressing the most common view. He is doing exactly what so many others have done.Doesn't seem like he's ignoring anything.
He's acknowledging that there are people dying on both sides of this, guilt to be had all around. Something you try to avoid or trivialize.
There are Israelis who disagree with their government's handling of this. Just as there were Americans (myself included) who felt at odds with the doctrine of the Bush administration. Should they be viewed in the same way? Not an attack, just a thought.
It's a sad situation all around.
What do you want to hear?He isn't doing anything wrong, he is expressing the most common view. He is doing exactly what so many others have done.
Meanwhile the body count rises.
Meanwhile some Palestinian friends of mine say things like "The world is ignoring this".
Meanwhile America is the only nation on earth where public opinion isn't a near consensus that Israel is the most dangerous threat to peace and a rogue state.
Meanwhile nothing changes.
Meanwhile every person says "I'm one person, what can one person do?".
I'm not saying this is Chesus' fault, and I'm not even saying I'm angry at him. Or you for that matter, but make no mistake, I'm angry and I want more people to be angry.
OKI just don't think the Israeli people should be condemned for the actions of their government.
Non sequitur imo. Do you or I stand behind all of what our Federal Government is doing? Imo this is a situation without innocents except the random civilian victims on both sides. cnOK
Hamas is the bad guy too.
My reply was abstract.Non sequitur imo. Do you or I stand behind all of what our Federal Government is doing? Imo this is a situation without innocents except the random civilian victims on both sides. cn
Your primary aim is obviously to prove that you are "the most sympathetic" because I've literally told you like 12 times that I agree with you about the situation in Palestine being terrible but that there are also innocent deaths in Israel that can't just be swept under the rug because they don't fit your little diatribe.My reply was abstract.
His statement actually follows from mine because the "Israel is defending itself" (synonymous with "there are no bad guys") line is designed to make people not care. That is what people want, to not be burdened by this suffering. Therefore indeed my reply to his statement is non sequitur. Instead, I was employing an unconventional tactic to induce concern. I didn't think it would work anyway since he already cares somewhat. It certainly won't work on a left brain thinker like 'neer. Somebody somewhere may come to care.
My primary aim is simply to make people care.
I can see what you mean about me wanting to make a show of being the most caring.Your primary aim is obviously to prove that you are "the most sympathetic".
Killing innocent civilians isn't acceptable when the IDF does it, so why should I extend the privilege to Hamas?
It's not that you can't espouse an opinion. It's just you can't get defensive when you're asked to expand upon it, and you can't blatantly ignore people when they try to articulate there's.I can see what you mean about me wanting to make a show of being the most caring.
I never said any privilege should be extended to Hamas as evidenced by my admission I think like 10 times now that indeed, Hamas is the bad guy too.
How many times will you ask me to admit this? Seriously.
I can't say anything against Israel in this thread with out being reminded of this.
I'm an ass hole.It's not that you can't espouse an opinion. It's just you can't get defensive when you're asked to expand upon it, and you can't blatantly ignore people when they try to articulate there's.
That's all.
Happy Thanksgiving.
up until 2 days ago you weren'tI'm an ass hole.
You didn't expect me to turn on Obama? I'm surprised.up until 2 days ago you weren't
SEEMS theocratic?? SEEMS!??!Before the Occupation of Israel there were many Jews living peacefully and coexisting in Palestine.
Iran seems to be theocratic, not as bad as the Taliban regime or Saudi but theocratic in many ways nonetheless, yet Jews don't have to hide at all, actually there are 25,000 of them in Tehran alone.
i believe you mean the interpretation of my premise.I was not concerning myself with Kynes' premise. I was addressing your reminiscence of Jews living peaceably in old Palestine. Too much has happened for that to be the case again. "Do over!" has a poor record in history.
Also, if you want to argue that nonsecular Muslim nations are tolerant. I submit the example of Iran. They have a Constitutional mandate, (similar to an article in our own Bill of Rights) declaring religious tolerance to be the law of the land, since since early days Persia was a multireligious culture. Lately however, this has been treated more and more cavalierly, even though the law has not been overturned. If the trend continues, the legal protection of non-Muslims will be a hollow shell of abstract law.
As for the toleration of Jews by the core of Islamic nations, that has been rather spotty. cn