Want to ban guns?

[Trolling]

So what about car accidents? Ban all cars?

 

[cannabineer]

So what about car accidents? Ban all cars?

Ban accidents. cn

 

[PeyoteReligion]

You just said the same thing about knives yesterday didn't you? I mean it's just a terrific case because it's totally logical and everything We should ban books because you can learn bad things from them! And no more belts because you can strangle people with them, same with shoelaces.

Just ban everything! Stay locked up in your home and don't go outside!

Im not a big fan of slippery slope arguments.

 

[cannabineer]

I think there should be a moratorium on bans while we contemplate outlawing moratoria. cn

 

[TigerClock]

All these things that will kill you... Marijuana is not one of them.

 

[Trolling]

You just said the same thing about knives yesterday didn't you? I mean it's just a terrific case because it's totally logical and everything We should ban books because you can learn bad things from them! And no more belts because you can strangle people with them, same with shoelaces.

Just ban everything! Stay locked up in your home and don't go outside!

Im not a big fan of slippery slope arguments.

Do you think I'm for or against pro guns?

Or are you not capable to understand sarcasm?

 

[PeyoteReligion]

Do you think I'm for or against pro guns?

Or are you not capable to understand sarcasm?

Pro, and the sarcasm was palpable. My point is that even if you are pro gun, it's a ludicrous point to make. It's not convincing anybody of your point. I am also pro leave-my-guns-alone, but "ban cars" is a rather facile argument against banning guns IMO. Or are you not capable of understanding my point that if "ban cars because car accidents" is your base for not banning guns, it's not a very good one?

 

[Trolling]

Well if you kept reading my ban knives, it was a joke. The baning cars was only a response to gun accidents, and a joke at the same time.



Again... S A R C A S M.

 

[UncleBuck]

The point of the 2nd amendment is to protect us from our government. Not for hunting. Therefor we should be able to legally own the same guns the police/military use. And do not resort to "oh so you want nukes too" because that argument is ridiculous.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"

without nukes and chemical weapons and the like, you simply can't defend yourself from the government. that argument is a century or two too old.

and even if this was 200 years ago, that was not the point, that was a point.

 

[wheels619]

All these things that will kill you... Marijuana is not one of them.

a gun wont kill u if its left alone on a table. so why ban something thats harmless by itself but isnt in the hands of a retard. even a remote control can be a weapon if weilded by a swinging retard. should we outlaw retards? i mean remote controls? lmao. j/k

 

[UncleBuck]

And more and more and mmooaarr! Where does it end? cn

Im not a big fan of slippery slope arguments.

way to shoot down the bear!

 

[UncleBuck]

a gun wont kill u if its left alone on a table. so why ban something thats harmless by itself but isnt in the hands of a retard. even a remote control can be a weapon if weilded by a swinging retard. should we outlaw retards? i mean remote controls? lmao. j/k

how many massacres via remote control in the last decade?

 

[TigerClock]

I guess I could beat someone to death with a kilo.

 

[wheels619]

without nukes and chemical weapons and the like, you simply can't defend yourself from the government. that argument is a century or two too old.

and even if this was 200 years ago, that was not the point, that was a point.

someone needs to watch more red dawn. lol. j/k. im high and jumped in at the last second. lmao

 

[wheels619]

how many massacres via remote control in the last decade?

how many massacred by a lonely unused left alone firearm? again its not the gun its the users.

 

[UncleBuck]

how many massacred by a lonely unused left alone firearm?

there was one less than a week ago. a firearm was left alone and adam lanza took it to massacre a classroom full of six year olds.

 

[cannabineer]

way to shoot down the bear!

aaghk ... ya got me ... cn

 

[PeyoteReligion]

there was one less than a week ago. a firearm was left alone and adam lanza took it to massacre a classroom full of six year olds.

I just love it when you take posts out of context and don't use the whole post. You could get a good paying job with the media!

 

[wheels619]

there was one less than a week ago. a firearm was left alone and adam lanza took it to massacre a classroom full of six year olds.

after he stole it and shot his mom in the face. ur point being? it wasnt the guns fault that remote controls i mean retards got a hold of it. its in all honesty his mothers fault for not having them all properly locked up in a gunsafe away from her deranged unsociable problem child of a son.

 

[Trolling]

You just said the same thing about knives yesterday didn't you? I mean it's just a terrific case because it's totally logical and everything We should ban books because you can learn bad things from them! And no more belts because you can strangle people with them, same with shoelaces.

Just ban everything! Stay locked up in your home and don't go outside!

Im not a big fan of slippery slope arguments.

So then why respond with this post in the first place if you knew it was a joke?


"You said the same thing about knives yesterday" I take that as you think I'm not pro guns after the rest of the post, if you know it's a joke, why post this then?