this is the new censorship... under the guise of national or state security... look forward to this being the new normal..The sheriff told all of the reporters to stay away and ordered all helos away "for their safety". There was a reporter on the ground shooting video, and he recorded them yelling to burn the house down. CNN has it on full blast right now. They had an ex FBI asst director on the line and he was mumbling, fumbling, over it.
This is an assumption - but since they murdered him we'll never know will we.He wasn't willing to turn himself in so a fair trial wouldn't have been possible.
Assumption #2. Would you have come out knowing you would be shot down on sight ?He was going to shoot to kill until he escaped, which is why he never came out of the cabin.
Put it this way, if your 71 year old grandmother was named Emma Hernandez I would be wondering why LAPD tried to murder her and her daughter with no warning.Put it this way, if one of your dearest family members or friends worked as an officer and was shot and killed by a criminal and this happened, I guarantee you wouldn't be thinking about his "fair trial".
I don't agree with murder, but this guy had already murdered multiple people, tied up innocent people, stole vehicles, etc. Wait him out? Like after all of this he was going to stop, accept what he was doing was wrong, and be willing to spend the rest of his life in prison? The ONLY way I agree with you is if the media is setting this up to make Dorner look guilty when he's not.I actually don't hate cops. They do a job I would not want to do. But, it is not their job to murder people, it is their job to apprehend people. The police didn't have to burn him like Waco. They didn't even have to go in, just wait him out, tear gas, flash grenades, etc. Or like I said wait him out they did have him surrounded, did they not? He wasn't going anywhere.
My point is moot because they murdered him. I am surprised that you agree with murder.
They were acting in retaliation, he shot multiple officers.The issue Jtprin can't seem to grasp is that they didn't kill him in self defense. They straight up burned down the house he was in in order to murder him. It's not the same thing. Shooting him in retaliation for shooting at them is one thing. Tear gassing him and him choking to death rather than coming out similar to shooting him in defense. Surrounding the cabin then setting fire to it, standing there watching it burn with guns firmly planted in their shoulders waiting to cut him in half the second he walks out the door is criminal.
I believe there is a recording of it actually.The spin has happened. I checked several news sites and no mention of "burn the house down" or "gas being used".
No, they said wait him out. he couldnt go anywhere. Why cant some people comprehend what the hell they read, and not twist it to say something else.So you suggest sending more officers into the cabin, putting them at an unneccesary risk for being killed, all so that Dorner (who is the one doing the killing) can have a fair trial? Are you fucking insane?
There it is - retaliation. That is not what police are supposed to be about.They were acting in retaliation, he shot multiple officers.
Retaliation = RevengeThey were acting in retaliation, he shot multiple officers.
Again, so Dorner can shoot and kill officers but they can't kill him? It's self defense, except the police are the victims in this situation. My concern is that the media may have made it look like he's a murderer when he's not, in order to push gun control on us. Maybe they killed him so he couldn't tell his story? It's possible, but if the situation happened legitimately, then why can't the cops act in self defense?There it is - retaliation. That is not what police are supposed to be about.
Another question is why is a disciplinary board overseen by cops? Why not citizens?So they fired him(no pun intended) for a police report he filed on another officer for mis-conduct?
YES EXACTLY! It is their job to ARREST him not murder him unless he gives them no choice. They HAD him. They burned it down anyway.Again, so Dorner can shoot and kill officers but they can't kill him? It's self defense, except the police are the victims in this situation. My concern is that the media may have made it look like he's a murderer when he's not, in order to push gun control on us. Maybe they killed him so he couldn't tell his story? It's possible, but if the situation happened legitimately, then why can't the cops act in self defense?
You're angry because they killed somebody who was on a killing spree? A lot of cops are corrupt and plain stupid, especially the idiots that shot at innocent people without any real inclination Dorner was there... but come on, this man murdered multiple people and clearly wasn't turning himself in, all while shooting at police officers.
He wasn't willing to turn himself in so a fair trial wouldn't have been possible. He was going to shoot to kill until he escaped, which is why he never came out of the cabin. Put it this way, if one of your dearest family members or friends worked as an officer and was shot and killed by a criminal and this happened, I guarantee you wouldn't be thinking about his "fair trial".