nontheist
Well-Known Member
More specific the media will ignore it because it's in their better interest to do so.
So... The cops burned the cabin....
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
Figong
Well-Known Member
Agreed on this point too, either due to cash payments.. or there will be another 'multi-murderer' who 'steals a news van' and the cops will open up on the van without verifying the driver too. Sound familiar? .. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2013/02/lapd-will-provide-new-truck.html - how thoughtful.. you almost kill 2 ladies who had nothing to do with it, shoot up their vehicle.. then say you'll provide a new truck?
nontheist
Well-Known Member
And here we sit with obvious information not being reported. Irony is it?
fb360
Active Member
This. Not only do these events affect the LAPD, but it also is telling about the government, which controls the media. It is very telling about how out of control our local, state and national govts have become.
That is why you tell everyone who has any interest the truth of the situation. My family doesnt follow politics but I explained to them every detail of the situation, not only so that they will be educated about it, but so they can spread that knowledge to their friends and acquaintances.
Knowledge is power. If only 50% of our population had > 50 IQ, we could use this knowledge to comprehend and act upon our out of control government.
e;
Just imagine if we allowed a State of the Union Address made by the innocent ladies who were shot at by the LAPD, and the whole nation took notice.
I can see the argument now:
We are being stripped of our guns as a result of irresponsible and mentally ill individuals using them to commit heinous crimes against innocents. However, when the police, more specifically the LAPD, commit these same crimes, they are viewed as accidental. That the "gun" had nothing to do with the amount of destruction the police just accomplished upon us innocent civilians. But no, a gun ban for police will never take place, because they need them for protection from civilians shooting at them. What about the police shooting at us? Are we less valuable than a uniformed individual? Should our rights and liberties be held to lower standards than our "faithful" armed enforcers? What form of protection should we use in the event of the police using "assault weapons" against us "accidentally"? A knife? A bat?
Lol... Obama and the rest of the individuals advocating legislation towards gun bans would be verbally ass raped into oblivion.
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
Why do the police still use an unencrypted scanner? With a digital signal like cell phones, the police could lie all they want. The courts already ruled cops can lie "for our best interests ."
Figong
Well-Known Member
Only some do.. others use a network that requires DTMF tone w/CTCSS.. all depends on the setup. A few of the frequencies were switched to DTMF with CTCSS right before the initial tear gas hit.. and they were calling out the walls by numbers, not compass directions. TAC-1 and 2 were, anyway.. I believe MNTN 1 and 2 were taken offline temp shortly after the gas.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Why should the property damaging actions of one party (the cops) be paid for by others (the tax slaves) that had nothing do with damaging the property?
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
If it were your house, you'd pat the cops on the back for a job well done?
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Didn't Villariagosa raise money from private investors to put towards the reward?
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
I'd ask for a refund if my money to catch a cop killer went to instead stupid cops fuck up.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Eh, I'm not sure that's how it works.. They're using the technicality that he was killed and not captured when the reward stated info leading to the 'capture' of the guy..
Sure lends credibility to any further civilian support for LAPD (or all law enforcement) engagements..
"Help us! We'll pay you!" "We didn't capture the guy, fuck you!"
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Apologies, but i do not believe that for a hot second. Coming out with his hands up would have very probably been followed within seconds by an accidental discharge or two. cn
tomahawk2406
Well-Known Member
i don't see what the big deal is.......guy was a murder, cops burned down the place to kill him. end of story. why risk more dead cops when you could just burn the place down and kill the guy? all this "being put in front of a judge" shit is fucking stupid.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Dissenting opinion. The only acceptable way for a non-individual, such as a society, to deal with rulebreakers is by due process. A society that behaves murderously, killing citizens without that due process, is violating the basic social contract (and opens itself to destructive revision). Individuals are granted a dispensation from these rules under the category of self-defense, but a society doesn't have that as a viable excuse. cn
squarepush3r
Well-Known Member
It's not like they are held accountable even in times of wrong doing, so they have no motivation to even cover their lies lol.
tomahawk2406
Well-Known Member
too much bear crap, did not read.
its totally ok to blast some 17 year old kid who robs your house for copper though? the dude is a KNOWN killer, a threat to society that has been striking at random. don't give me all that due process shit. the more you wait, the more cops show up dead. Cops have families to, they're not robots. its simple rules of engagement. the dude wanted to kill, well expect it back PUNK!
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Funny how the "anarchist" supports the State's unlawful killing of citizens.
You're an expert at talking out both sides of your mouth.