Protests in NYC!!!

abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
If the politics of anarchism seem vague to you, it is only because being apolitical is not compatible with the thinking of someone such as yourself, who can identify with the views of Ayn Rand.

Wait, didn't you argue pro segregation?
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
well, both of the eyewitnesses that we know of are black, so neither will pass muster with you.
Click to expand...
again wth the mysterious "second witness" who was not mentined int either of the reports you cuted, despite their inflammatory rabblerousing.

if there is a second witness why isnt this mystery person quoted, referenced or even mentioned in the reports you cited?

they jumped in the way-back machine to dredge up the amidou diallou case, but your putative "second witness" was just to hot to touch.

doubting the racist rabblerousers is racism, but swallowing everything they claim is just good sense of course.

this is all just more lefty logic blinders, and doublestatdards.
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
If the politics of anarchism seem vague to you, it is only because being apolitical is not compatible with the thinking of someone such as yourself, who can identify with the views of Ayn Rand.

Wait, didn't you argue pro segregation?
Click to expand...
The idea of Anarchism isn't vague, it is a direct moral argument against that of the use of force and the idea of moral superiority. Stop pretending you are an anarchist, you are not. You are a vaguest, who can't even explain something that you believe in. Its very sad, bro. You just sit around and insult everyone else ideas and hope they don't ask about yours. You are just another liberal, who is against economic freedom because you don't understand capitalism. You, the great philosopher, can't even have a philosophical argument without reverting back to naming all of the philosophers you have supposedly read and calling everyone else dumb. Come out of your tent, stop drawing anarchist symbols, and grow up.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
lifegoesonbrah said:
The idea of Anarchism isn't vague, it is a direct moral argument against that of the use of force and the idea of moral superiority. Stop pretending you are an anarchist, you are not. You are a vaguest, who can't even explain something that you believe in. Its very sad, bro. You just sit around and insult everyone else ideas and hope they don't ask about yours. You are just another liberal, who is against economic freedom because you don't understand capitalism. You, the great philosopher, can't even have a philosophical argument without reverting back to naming all of the philosophers you have supposedly read and calling everyone else dumb. Come out of your tent, stop drawing anarchist symbols, and grow up.
Click to expand...
LOL

Clearly butt hurt.

Look at your sig bro. You're only looking for something to troll.

You still don't understand the central rule in all of debate. You can't criticize something you know nothing about. You seem to be intent only on shifting focus away from points I have made to try and shine a spot light on what I believe. You do this despite that I have firmly insisted that I do not wish to push my ideas, only to challenge the vile views of anarchocapitalists. You have failed, utterly, to defend those views and so in final resort, you have tried to make threads to ridicule what you think my views are. You have demonstrated in these numerous threads that you don't understand those philosophies, despite that I have charitably indicated to you where I read of them.

You're just butt hurt that I'm telling the interwebbz how Rawn Pawl fucks turtles. Now that you have wasted so much of your life trying to troll by ridiculing something you don't understand, why don't you take a break from sucking Rawn Pawl's taint and learn about anarchy.

For the record, you're the liberal. You're the neoliberal who thinks laissez faire is magical. You pray to the invisible hand of Adam Smith and you believe the fortune 500 really is the rightful royalty of the earth. The Koch brothers own your party (both of them, the one that calls itself libertarian and the GOP) and you have indicated that these are your heroes because you get so bent out of shape when I call them what they are.

So fucking bent out of shape are you, that you have now made 4 separate threads with the sole purpose of goading me into a debate to defend views I have made clear I'm not looking to push.

Now read the following, and I will even caps lock and bold it for you to facilitate your infantile comprehension of logic.

I DON'T HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHAT ANARCHY IS TO YOU. I TAKE PLEASURE IN WRITING ABOUT WHAT IT IS NOT! IF YOU WISH TO DEBATE IT, READ A FUCKING BOOK TO FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH IT SUCH THAT YOU CAN DIRECT CRITICISM UPON IT. MURRAY ROTHBARD, AYN RAND, AND LUDWIG MISES WERE NOT ANARCHISTS. THEY WERE NEOLIBERALS.
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
LOL

Clearly butt hurt.

Look at your sig bro. You're only looking for something to troll.

You still don't understand the central rule in all of debate. You can't criticize something you know nothing about. You seem to be intent only on shifting focus away from points I have made to try and shine a spot light on what I believe. You do this despite that I have firmly insisted that I do not wish to push my ideas, only to challenge the vile views of anarchocapitalists. You have failed, utterly, to defend those views and so in final resort, you have tried to make threads to ridicule what you think my views are. You have demonstrated in these numerous threads that you don't understand those philosophies, despite that I have charitably indicated to you where I read of them.

You're just butt hurt that I'm telling the interwebbz how Rawn Pawl fucks turtles. Now that you have wasted so much of your life trying to troll by ridiculing something you don't understand, why don't you take a break from sucking Rawn Pawl's taint and learn about anarchy.

For the record, you're the liberal. You're the neoliberal who thinks laissez faire is magical. You pray to the invisible hand of Adam Smith and you believe the fortune 500 really is the rightful royalty of the earth. The Koch brothers own your party (both of them, the one that calls itself libertarian and the GOP) and you have indicated that these are your heroes because you get so bent out of shape when I call them what they are.

So fucking bent out of shape are you, that you have now made 4 separate threads with the sole purpose of goading me into a debate to defend views I have made clear I'm not looking to push.

Now read the following, and I will even caps lock and bold it for you to facilitate your infantile comprehension of logic.

I DON'T HAVE TO EXPLAIN WHAT ANARCHY IS TO YOU. I TAKE PLEASURE IN WRITING ABOUT WHAT IT IS NOT! IF YOU WISH TO DEBATE IT, READ A FUCKING BOOK TO FAMILIARIZE YOURSELF WITH IT SUCH THAT YOU CAN DIRECT CRITICISM UPON IT. MURRAY ROTHBARD, AYN RAND, AND LUDWIG MISES WERE NOT ANARCHISTS. THEY WERE NEOLIBERALS.
Click to expand...

Exactly, you just are here to insult everyone else ideas and not debate your own. You are like the teenage girl that sits around and complains about her parents. She doesn't help do anything, just calls everyone dumb, that's you. You don't contribute to the political debate when you offer no solution, negative nancy. Now find a political philosophy that you don't have to hide from everyone and is actually viable for our planet. You exert enough energy with the Chomsky cover up that you could actually be promoting ideas that would actually help our situation, not some vague nonsense about everyone freely sharing all of the means of production and planets resources in harmony with flower bunnies leading you to the nearest reeces cup mountain so that you can frolic and make angels in the marshmallow snow. You cannot have a controlled economy without having a coercive form of governance, whether it be direct democracy or a dictatorship. Denying that simple fact (which chomsky advocates for a direct democracy), shows that you have read very little sane philosophers/economists. The free market is what occurs when you have very small governance, as it is the only economy that doesn't need government to operate. The free market develops spontaneously and can only operate without central planning. A controlled economy is the opposite, it needs large oversight to equally disseminate resources and develop means of production. An organized and controlled economy cannot be developed without a lot of oversight and structure, which is far from anarchy. But if you read everything ever written ever, then you know this and are the best troll ever.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Life,

Abandon doesn't owe you anything. If he wants to play with you, or if I want to play with either of us, is all our individual choice. How can you be even a right wing libertarian, like I am, if you don't even understand that? I don't agree with either of you on many issues. Do I have your permission to at least laugh?
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Here is the view of a voluntaryist (Rawn Pawl worshiper):

"I'm sick of this corporate state ruling our lives, we should get rid of the gov't and just let the bourgeois hire Wackenhut to beat black people on the streets of New York."
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan said:
Life,

Abandon doesn't owe you anything. If he wants to play with you, or if I want to play with either of us, is all our individual choice. How can you be even a right wing libertarian, like I am, if you don't even understand that? I don't agree with either of you on many issues. Do I have your permission to at least laugh?
Click to expand...
I never said he shouldn't be able to post here, just calling him on his bullshit. But I think my work here is done, I have pushed it far enough and exposed what he is.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Here is the view of a voluntaryist (Rawn Pawl worshiper):

"I'm sick of this corporate state ruling our lives, we should get rid of the gov't and just let the bourgeois hire Wackenhut to beat black people on the streets of New York."
Click to expand...

have you ever read the book "Market for Liberty" by Morris and Linda Tannehill? You might find it interesting. PEACE.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
have you ever read the book "Market for Liberty" by Morris and Linda Tannehill? You might find it interesting. PEACE.
Click to expand...
Chapter 4, Government – An Unnecessary Evil, states that government is a coercive monopoly.

Use pretty words to make it sound like you're not pushing for feudalism but once that "monopoly" is broken, land barons will employ private armies themselves.

It's fucking crap bro.
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Chapter 4, Government – An Unnecessary Evil, states that government is a coercive monopoly.

Use pretty words to make it sound like you're not pushing for feudalism but once that "monopoly" is broken, land barons will employ private armies themselves.

It's fucking crap bro.
Click to expand...
Your utopia is crap, bro. It leads to a The Giver type society. I'd rather die or be a wage slave than risk your inevitable.
 
lifegoesonbrah

lifegoesonbrah

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Chapter 4, Government – An Unnecessary Evil, states that government is a coercive monopoly.

Use pretty words to make it sound like you're not pushing for feudalism but once that "monopoly" is broken, land barons will employ private armies themselves.

It's fucking crap bro.
Click to expand...
So you support government monopoly, yet you are an anarchist? Cool story.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top