zimmerman news
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
- Status
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
catrapist or carport or whatever his name is clarified that he is not talking about the legal definition, but the colloquial.
zimm is far from blameless in this, he was pretty lucky to get off the hook.
Cuz even though Zimmer can't pass the easy PD PT Test, when faced with a racial killing he can run over 60 MPH sustained.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hey man, you're the one who asked what i was gonna do with my time, you're witnessing the answer.
racists aren't gonna vanish anytime soon
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
It will be a cold day in hell when the verdict of not guilty is luck after shooting an assaulter.
beardo
Well-Known Member
not even close.
you and i are completely innocent in the death of martin, zimmerman is simply not guilty.
just like OJ was "not guilty"
You are just as guilty as anyone
Do you pay for the department of education that failed Trayvon and Zimmerman?
You contributed to this tragedy
You watch TV you Listen to music you encourage that nonsense that polluted their minds
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
martin thought he had lost zimm but zimm kept on looking, you been asleep, child?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Name one other found guilty of slander. I'll weight, I'm sure your awl upset write now.
It should have never gone to trial in the first place, it was a cut and dried self defense case from the beginning. Some of the best legal minds in the USA said so from the start. This was all political to keep the masses from storming the gates. A racial divide has been entrenched in this country since the times of Lincoln.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
too bad the evidence is more consistent with martin defending himself than it is with assault.
not even close.
you and i are completely innocent in the death of martin, zimmerman is simply not guilty.
just like OJ was "not guilty"
Innocent per the courts. The jury doesn't address morality, only legality based on evidence. Not guilty and innocent are the same thing. Time to put on your big boy pants and admit that Zimmerman was falsely tried for a crime there was never evidence of.
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
Well, he had a phone, you would think he'd call the police if he were all innocent don't ya?
beardo
Well-Known Member
Tell me about it, that last one said he was going to be leaving to pick up his wife, then came back for one more racial slur.racists aren't gonna vanish anytime soon
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
The prosecution failed to prove that...
The jury is smarter than you are obviously.
A 6 woman jury, 5 of them mothers... They acquitted him of murder. That means they found him not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
I accept the apology you will never be man enough to make UB....
Accept the verdict or go steal yourself a TV while blaming the case... I dont really care at this point.
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
I don't think we are talking about the same case here then, and i think the jurors would concur with me on this one.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
late to the party, but Yes. cn
tryingtogrow89
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there was plenty of reason to bring this in front of a jury from the start, even serino was noting all the lies from zimmerman from the start.
innocent people don't need to lie.
actually, they said "not guilty". so not guilty per the courts.
lol, colloquially they are not. and there was plenty of evidence of a crime, why else would zimm have lied so much?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
not exactly. they failed to prove their overall case but not every aspect of it.
you don't know what the jurors think about that specific aspect until we (possibly) hear from them later.
generally, the person that runs away is more likely to be the defender than the person who follows with a gun.*
but i know you don't generally like to occupy the same reality as the rest of us.
- Status