Antidisestablishmentarian
Well-Known Member
Funny but not entirely true.
They have to at least give you the bird first.
They have to at least give you the bird first.
The teenager had not broken into the house. He was shot in the driveway, 30 feet away from the homeowner. The homeowner said he thought the guy was going for a weapon. Plausible? I dunno.it gives good people the opportunity to not be prosecuted by criminals breaking into their homes when we shoot them. theres no reason anyone i dont invite should be on my property, especially after dark. if so, they should expect to be shot or tomahawked.
Not similar at all. Why do you idiots keep ignoring that it was Martin who attacked Zimmerman.This guy Zinda was basically Zimmerman but with an ax............
OK, so now we know you're not an idiot. You're a liar.This is the same thing Zimmerman did. Chased the guy down because he though he 'looked' guilty & when the victim stopped to defend himself, he killed him. But Zimmerman was more humane because he used a gun........murder just the same.....ax or gun
All you have to do to see it his way is just ignore all the witnesses and physical evidence and make up "facts" that support your opinion.Doublejj, I respect you as a human, but I think your opinions on this matter are ridiculous and ill informed. I just can't understand how you see things differently than I do. I've tried to see it your way, but to me there just isn't another possibility. It's like trying to imagine a round triangle.
1st or 2nd degree?He received 16 to life for his axe wielding skills.
Why do you keep ignoring that Martin was defending himself from an armed aggressor?.......if the guy with an ax threw the first punch to try to defend himself, you would say he started it! lol!OK, so now we know you're not an idiot. You're a liar.
Zimmerman was attacked by Martin. Very big difference. You can't be that stupid, so we must assume you're just dishonest.The only difference was Zimmerman used a gun........
That's my kind of gun control!There was a case a few years ago (I can't find the story or I'd post it). This property owner didn't like people "trespassing" thru a corner of his lot to get to the river. People would drive across a corner of his land to park near the river to fish & swim. He got a camera & videoed many people cutting thru. He decided to put a stop to it........with a gun. He gave his wife the camera & confronted the next car to drive thru, while holding his gun in his hand. When the driver of the car got out, the land owner raised his gun & pointed it at him. The driver feared for his life & hit the ground, rolled over & pulled his weapon, & put 3 shots center mass before the land owner got of a shot (missed). His wife had a great video of her husbands death. The car driver was never charged, not even trespassing......
If you provoke someone into defending themselves....then yes they are "attacking" you..........but the best defense is a good offence......even facing a crazy guy chasing you with a gun.......Zimmerman was attacked by Martin. Very big difference. You can't be that stupid, so we must assume you're just dishonest.
Honestly, my "stuff" is more important to me than your life. Those inanimate objects you hold with disdain may be the sustenance that keeps us alive. If you decide to commit a crime, you are also choosing to risk the consequences.human life, possessions . . .equal . . .makes super duper logical sense one is a inanimate object or tool for our use and another is a falible creation of biological variations that can create more life . . .totally the same thank Amerca for lettign us knwo whats more important . . . .our stuff obviously
Uh, nothing you said was true.NOT!!!!.......thought he was at the right house, tried to show you his Deaf Mute card & couldn't hear you say freeze.....cause he's deaf!!!!!
The Nazi party was formally known as the Socialist Democrat Party.no........... i think that guys a republican or a nazi or both............im just a normal guy w a family to take care of.........and i dont fuck around when it comes to their safety
that was an example of how a simple trespassing is not justification to shoot on sight (except Texas as duely noted).....not as fact.....Uh, nothing you said was true.
That's where he got it.Send this too the White House.
"shit, he ran"*it was Martin who attacked Zimmerman.
"then i went back towards him" said zimmerman.Zimmerman was attacked by Martin.
but....you're white.if Zimmerman stalked me like he did that young man, I would attack him too.......he's lucky it was an unarmed youth....and not someone like me...