A bad few months for teenage boys...

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So, creeping through front yards within inches of the windows like a peeping Tom or a burglar casing the joint when there's a perfectly good sidewalk to use
he wasn't doing any of that, you lying ass.

zimm himself didn't even say martin did that.

the gates closed at 7, martin's only way in was through the back of the complex, where he passed through on his way to the sidewalk.

And you're perfectly justified beating a man until he's either dead or unconscious?
if they cause you to fear for your life or great bodily harm, you do.

anyone who gets pursued like zimm pursued martin has that right. well, anyone with self preservation instincts.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Right after you list the names of every one he reported, I'll pick out the whites and Hispanics.
not how it works.

you said zimm reported multiple white people, now you need to back that up.

pro tip: you can't, so just admit that you lied (yet again).
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
do you go around stalking strangers at night red?........
Who was stalking? Ignoring my argument and retorting with a accusatory and deceptive question means you have no argument, but are willing to resort to dishonesty to defend your baseless theory. So, I've decided that you're really not worth talking to.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
I didn't think you would answer......I'll re-phrase that....I hope you don't go around stalking strangers at night red. Not everyone is an unarmed defenseless child......
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
not how it works. you said zimm reported multiple white people, now you need to back that up. pro tip: you can't, so just admit that you lied (yet again).
No, YOU said he only reported blacks. You never backed that up. Because it wasn't true. Pretending that my not having a list of the people's names, nearly all if not all of whom were never apprehended, while you have no such list either, somehow "proves" I'm lying is typical of your dishonest tactics. By the way, you're no "pro". Shit, the only thing you can do is grow pot and you claim you make no profit off that. Well, that and sponging off your relatives. I don't think that qualifies as a profession. Hey, you could be a spokes-model for Depends! You should check that out. You're well qualified. And you'd only have to show up a few days every year.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
I didn't think you would answer......I'll re-phrase that....I hope you don't go around stalking strangers at night red. Not everyone is an unarmed defenseless child......
The "defenseless child" was quite a bit bigger than Zimmerman and did overpower and pin Zimmerman to the ground. Don't try to distort the situation. I hope you don't go around stalking strangers at night either. I'm not asshole enough to go implying you do, tho.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Clearly a lie. Zimmerman reported several whites and Hispanics to the police while serving as a neighborhood watchman. Despite the lies Jesse Jackson told you.
No, YOU said he only reported blacks.
stop lying through your teeth, red. it is getting tiresome.

you made the claim in bold size 7 above, and now it is your job to back it up. it is not my job to supply you with a list, isnce you are the one who made a claim about that list.

now go ahead and apologize to all of us for lying, because i know you can't and won't back it up.

liar.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
I don't think it's wise for anyone to be stalking strangers at night red, you or me..........I mind my own business....unlike Zimmerman.....
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
stop lying through your teeth, red. it is getting tiresome. you made the claim in bold size 7 above, and now it is your job to back it up. it is not my job to supply you with a list, isnce you are the one who made a claim about that list. now go ahead and apologize to all of us for lying, because i know you can't and won't back it up. liar.
Its my "job" to cater to you, but not your "job"to back up your claims? Really? And you call me a liar? That's rich! You know all or nearly all the people he reported were never caught or identified, so you also know that there is no way to provide any such list of names. You even asking for it and pretending that that is a reasonable request proves you are dishonest and will say anything to "win" an argument. I got news for you. Zimmerman was acquitted. You lost. You just can't admit it Nanner nanner.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
I don't think it's wise for anyone to be stalking strangers at night red, you or me..........I mind my own business....unlike Zimmerman.....
He was the neighborhood watchman. It was his business. Still you keep using a deceptive word like "stalking" instead of calling it what it was. Following. Just like you're minding your own business now, liar.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He was the neighborhood watchman.
then why was he following instead of watching and reporting?

also, the guidelines for the watchman say not to carry a gun.

he was doing a pretty shitty job as watchman, but a bang up job as "follow with a gun in the dark" man.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Its my "job" to cater to you, but not your "job"to back up your claims? Really?
you made the claim that he reported MULTIPLE white people, so it is your job to prove that claim now, woman.

And you call me a liar?
yes, because you have been caught in lie after lie.

for example, you said it was not the case that zimm wouldn't give his address to dispatch because he thought martin was about. i called you out on that lie.

it really shows what a stupid liar you are.

You know all or nearly all the people he reported were never caught or identified, so you also know that there is no way to provide any such list of names.
now you're trying to change the goalposts, because yo know you are lying.

you claimed he REPORTED several white people, you said nothing about whether they were caught.

the list of people he reported to dispatch is a public document. just google it, dumbass.


IYou even asking for it and pretending that that is a reasonable request proves you are dishonest and will say anything to "win" an argument.
i'm not trying to win anything, i'm just showing people what a lying sack of shit you are.

and why is it an unreasonable request for me to ask you to back up a claim that you yourself made?

jesus christ red, just give the fuck up already and admit you lied. it is much easier that way on all of us.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Notice the operative word... GUIDLINES... By definition, they are non binding and cannot be legally enforced and are but mere suggestions to form routine.
if he refuses to follow the guidelines for a watchman, then why do people like you and red keep referring to him as one?

:lol:

jesus fucking christ. talk out of both sides more often.
 
Top