A bad few months for teenage boys...

Red1966 said:
"are you FOLLOWING him?"
Click to expand...

let's see, he followed a person who was running away.

they have a phrase for that, red.


[TD="align: left"] Verb [/TD]
[TD="align: left"] 1. [/TD]
[TD="align: left"] chase after *- pursue someone sexually or romantically chase court ,* romance ,* solicit ,* woo *- make amorous advances towards; "John is courting Mary"
[/TD]

[TD="align: left"][/TD]
[TD="align: left"] 2. [/TD]
[TD="align: left"]
C0A4D-chase-after.jpg
chase after *- go after with the intent to catch; "The policeman chased the mugger down the alley"; "the dog chased the rabbit"[/TD]
 
Red1966 said:
.......Pretending you succeeded again..........
Click to expand...

still waiting on you to back up your own claim that zimm reported MULTIPLE white people.

i am not pretending that your failure is my success. it is simply your failure. again.

no need to lie to us all, red.
 
Red1966 said:
Now you telling us he wasn't a member of the neighborhood watch?........lol............
Click to expand...

if he was a neighborhood watch, why did he ignore all the guidelines of it? why did he not only follow, but follow with a gun?

neither of those things are supposed to be done by neighborhood watch.
 
Red1966 said:
yeah,Zimmerman was (is) fat/overweight, miserably out of shape, and FAILED his martial arts training. Keep lying. We expect that of you. Tell us more about how I went back in time and falsified all those posts you made about you shitting and pissing your pants or refusing sex with your wife because "she bleeds from her vagina".
Click to expand...

studiously avoiding the joke about where your wives bled from.
 
Zimmermann was a wanna be cop but what i want to know is why are white people being baited and attacked because zimm was half mexican and jewish not even white..... Media uses these cases to drive us apart and create more unrest. Enter the police state. Besides until something is done about gang culture black kids biggest enemy here in california is themselves as with mexican gangsters killing eachother. Whites make up a small minority when it comes to attacking black or mexicans in the real world.
 
doublejj said:
trespassing is NOT a capitol offence!...and I would NEVER show anyone my gun.....they will know I have a gun when they see the muzzle flash, not before......the min you show a gun, you just gave the other guy reason to fear for his life & use deadly force ON YOU!!!
Click to expand...

tresspassing has been a killin crime since the first person to build a fence pulled a club on the first asshole to jump over it.

anybody sneakin into my yard has 2 choices:
1) raise their hands and explain themselves
2) run like a rabbit.

any other action will get them a lead milkshake.
 
It has been a few bad decades for the urban poor of Chicago & other cities. They have conveyor belts of mostly black kids dying on a daily basis.

I have an idea... Why dont we get rid of drug prohibition like we got rid of alcohol prohibition and eliminate the financial incentive for gangs to kill each other??? Naah, the government cant kill them all with abortion so this is the 2nd best route...
 
Dr Kynes said:
tresspassing has been a killin crime since the first person to build a fence pulled a club on the first asshole to jump over it.

anybody sneakin into my yard has 2 choices:
1) raise their hands and explain themselves
2) run like a rabbit.

any other action will get them a lead milkshake.
Click to expand...

another Texan......
 
Harrekin said:
Even in lefty Europe we've "castle doctrine".

Its not a left/right thing, it's a right to defend your home thing...
Click to expand...

shooting trespassers is not 'castle doctrine' (except in Texas). Castle doctrine is for intruder's into your dwelling, not some kid cutting across your lawn...(except in Texas).......
 
doublejj said:
shooting trespassers is not 'castle doctrine' (except in Texas). Castle doctrine is for intruder's into your dwelling, not some kid cutting across your lawn...(except in Texas).......
Click to expand...
Well kids shouldn't cross other people's lawns.

Even here where guns arnt as common, you'd still (at least) get your ass kicked for trespassing.
 
I dont want to sound mean but if your cutting through peoples property in any part of the world your asking for trouble. Fuck even without guns you might get a machete or a clubbing . Plus what happen to being real man here in so cal you know better than to hop even a friendlies frence. If i hopped into some gangsters yard i wouldnt wonder why they are shooting. As for chicagoes killing gangs .... Legalizing every drug in the world wont stop gang culture they arent all rich look at the project areas its a mentality issue that rest with the cultures and media industry glorifying violence. Theres no help for peolple who enjoy violence and where raised that way.
 
Amerikaner said:
I dont want to sound mean but if your cutting through peoples property in any part of the world your asking for trouble. Fuck even without guns you might get a machete or a clubbing . Plus what happen to being real man here in so cal you know better than to hop even a friendlies frence. If i hopped into some gangsters yard i wouldnt wonder why they are shooting. As for chicagoes killing gangs .... Legalizing every drug in the world wont stop gang culture they arent all rich look at the project areas its a mentality issue that rest with the cultures and media industry glorifying violence. Theres no help for peolple who enjoy violence and where raised that way.
Click to expand...

How many gang members are killing each other over alcohol? It is the turf wars that the drug gangs fight to sell drugs in certain areas that raise all the body counts. Take the income away from the gangs and they wouldnt even be able to afford bullets. What would the incentive be then to kill the guy standing on a certain street corner?

If you dont think the very lucrative drug trade is what is causing most of the urban violence I dont think you have thought it through.
 
NLXSK1 said:
How many gang members are killing each other over alcohol? It is the turf wars that the drug gangs fight to sell drugs in certain areas that raise all the body counts. Take the income away from the gangs and they wouldnt even be able to afford bullets. What would the incentive be then to kill the guy standing on a certain street corner?

If you dont think the very lucrative drug trade is what is causing most of the urban violence I dont think you have thought it through.
Click to expand...

yes, that's a genius idea. take the income away from people so they are poorer and thus fight less.

because crime and poverty are in no way directly correlated.

:dunce:

jesus christ, some people's children.
 
UncleBuck said:
yes, that's a genius idea. take the income away from people so they are poorer and thus fight less.

because crime and poverty are in no way directly correlated.

:dunce:

jesus christ, some people's children.
Click to expand...
So you support the sale and distribution of drugs like heroin, crack and crystal methamphetamine cos it's provides an income for people?

No offense, but that's fucked in the head, man...

Are you aware that providing the drugs to addicts for FREE is a hugely lower overall $$$ cost than drug-dependent related crime?
 
doublejj said:
"There is no reason in the world to carry a gun for Neighborhood Watch," said Chris Tutko, a retired police chief who now directs Neighborhood Watch for the sheriffs' association. "It gets people more into trouble than out of it." A manual published by the association for its "USAonWatch" program makes that very clear. "It should be emphasized to members that they do not possess police powers and they shall not carry weapons or pursue vehicles," the manual states. "Members should never confront suspicious persons who could be armed and dangerous."
Click to expand...
If Zimmerman followed the advice of your retired cop who always carried a gun when HE was on duty, he may very well have met his death at the hands of Martin that night. Reciting the opinion of someone who agrees with you doesn't really bolster your case. Zimmerman was within his rights to carry his weapon. He was within his rights to defend himself. Martin had no right to attack Zimmerman. Zimmerman was the victim here, not Martin. Your white guilt or whatever you want to call it, is causing you to ignore that. We even have idiots trying to pretend that Martin was such an angel that he went to the store to buy Skittles for his little brother. Despite the fact that the Skittles were opened and in Martins stomach, according to the autopsy report.
 
Red1966 said:
If Zimmerman followed the advice of your retired cop who always carried a gun when HE was on duty, he may very well have met his death at the hands of Martin that night. Reciting the opinion of someone who agrees with you doesn't really bolster your case. Zimmerman was within his rights to carry his weapon. He was within his rights to defend himself. Martin had no right to attack Zimmerman. Zimmerman was the victim here, not Martin. Your white guilt or whatever you want to call it, is causing you to ignore that. We even have idiots trying to pretend that Martin was such an angel that he went to the store to buy Skittles for his little brother. Despite the fact that the Skittles were opened and in Martins stomach, according to the autopsy report.
Click to expand...

it would be impossible for martin to have attacked zimmerman, his only option in the face of an unidentified, creepy stranger following him in the dark after he ran was self defense.

i know you're a huge racist, red, but even black children have the right to defend themselves from creepy strangers that follow them in the dark.

secondly, there is absolutely zero evidence that martin attacked zimmerman. there is a lot more evidence to believe that zimmerman attacked martin, since after all, zimmy was the one chasing after martin, who was running away.

but all the facts in the world won't convince a racist like red. see my sig.
 
UncleBuck said:
let's see, he followed a person who was running away. they have a phrase for that, red.
[TD="align: left"] Verb [/TD] [TD="align: left"] 1. [/TD] [TD="align: left"] chase after *- pursue someone sexually or romantically chase court ,* romance ,* solicit ,* woo *- make amorous advances towards; "John is courting Mary" [/TD] [TD="align: left"][/TD] [TD="align: left"] 2. [/TD] [TD="align: left"]
C0A4D-chase-after.jpg
chase after *- go after with the intent to catch; "The policeman chased the mugger down the alley"; "the dog chased the rabbit"[/TD]
Click to expand...
Your citation disproves your statement. But you already knew that.
 
UncleBuck said:
yes, that's a genius idea. take the income away from people so they are poorer and thus fight less.

because crime and poverty are in no way directly correlated.

:dunce:

jesus christ, some people's children.
Click to expand...

You don't honestly believe ending drug prohibition would increase gang related crime do you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

vostok
In the US, you don't have to kill to be a murderer
2
Replies
25
Views
1K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
squarepush3r
Police: Pot might be factor in Montana killing
24 25 26
Replies
503
Views
21K
fdd2blk
F
Padawanbater2
US police killed 77 people in September
Replies
17
Views
637
greenlikemoney
greenlikemoney
Winter Woman
2013: The law enforcement's dirty dozen
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
slowbus
slowbus
squarepush3r
Why there are no "good cops"
Replies
7
Views
1K
canndo
canndo
Back
Top