A bad few months for teenage boys...

[UncleBuck]

"are you FOLLOWING him?"

let's see, he followed a person who was running away.

they have a phrase for that, red.

Verb	1.	chase after*- pursue someone sexually or romanticallychase court,*romance,*solicit,*woo*- make amorous advances towards; "John is courting Mary"
	2.	chase after*- go after with the intent to catch; "The policeman chased the mugger down the alley"; "the dog chased the rabbit"

 

[UncleBuck]

.......Pretending you succeeded again..........

still waiting on you to back up your own claim that zimm reported MULTIPLE white people.

i am not pretending that your failure is my success. it is simply your failure. again.

no need to lie to us all, red.

 

[UncleBuck]

Now you telling us he wasn't a member of the neighborhood watch?........lol............

if he was a neighborhood watch, why did he ignore all the guidelines of it? why did he not only follow, but follow with a gun?

neither of those things are supposed to be done by neighborhood watch.

 

[UncleBuck]

As Zimmerman did not have an opportunity to retreat, SYG laws don't even come into play.

yeah, he only had several minutes to get back to his car.*

what did he say he did instead?

"then i went back towards him"

 

[UncleBuck]

yeah,Zimmerman was (is) fat/overweight, miserably out of shape, and FAILED his martial arts training. Keep lying. We expect that of you. Tell us more about how I went back in time and falsified all those posts you made about you shitting and pissing your pants or refusing sex with your wife because "she bleeds from her vagina".

studiously avoiding the joke about where your wives bled from.

 

[Amerikaner]

Zimmermann was a wanna be cop but what i want to know is why are white people being baited and attacked because zimm was half mexican and jewish not even white..... Media uses these cases to drive us apart and create more unrest. Enter the police state. Besides until something is done about gang culture black kids biggest enemy here in california is themselves as with mexican gangsters killing eachother. Whites make up a small minority when it comes to attacking black or mexicans in the real world.

 

[Dr Kynes]

trespassing is NOT a capitol offence!...and I would NEVER show anyone my gun.....they will know I have a gun when they see the muzzle flash, not before......the min you show a gun, you just gave the other guy reason to fear for his life & use deadly force ON YOU!!!

tresspassing has been a killin crime since the first person to build a fence pulled a club on the first asshole to jump over it.

anybody sneakin into my yard has 2 choices:
1) raise their hands and explain themselves
2) run like a rabbit.

any other action will get them a lead milkshake.

 

[NLXSK1]

It has been a few bad decades for the urban poor of Chicago & other cities. They have conveyor belts of mostly black kids dying on a daily basis.

I have an idea... Why dont we get rid of drug prohibition like we got rid of alcohol prohibition and eliminate the financial incentive for gangs to kill each other??? Naah, the government cant kill them all with abortion so this is the 2nd best route...

 

[doublejj]

tresspassing has been a killin crime since the first person to build a fence pulled a club on the first asshole to jump over it.

anybody sneakin into my yard has 2 choices:
1) raise their hands and explain themselves
2) run like a rabbit.

any other action will get them a lead milkshake.

another Texan......

 

[Harrekin]

another Texan......

Even in lefty Europe we've "castle doctrine".

Its not a left/right thing, it's a right to defend your home thing...

 

[doublejj]

Even in lefty Europe we've "castle doctrine".

Its not a left/right thing, it's a right to defend your home thing...

shooting trespassers is not 'castle doctrine' (except in Texas). Castle doctrine is for intruder's into your dwelling, not some kid cutting across your lawn...(except in Texas).......

 

[Harrekin]

shooting trespassers is not 'castle doctrine' (except in Texas). Castle doctrine is for intruder's into your dwelling, not some kid cutting across your lawn...(except in Texas).......

Well kids shouldn't cross other people's lawns.

Even here where guns arnt as common, you'd still (at least) get your ass kicked for trespassing.

 

[Amerikaner]

I dont want to sound mean but if your cutting through peoples property in any part of the world your asking for trouble. Fuck even without guns you might get a machete or a clubbing . Plus what happen to being real man here in so cal you know better than to hop even a friendlies frence. If i hopped into some gangsters yard i wouldnt wonder why they are shooting. As for chicagoes killing gangs .... Legalizing every drug in the world wont stop gang culture they arent all rich look at the project areas its a mentality issue that rest with the cultures and media industry glorifying violence. Theres no help for peolple who enjoy violence and where raised that way.

 

[NLXSK1]

I dont want to sound mean but if your cutting through peoples property in any part of the world your asking for trouble. Fuck even without guns you might get a machete or a clubbing . Plus what happen to being real man here in so cal you know better than to hop even a friendlies frence. If i hopped into some gangsters yard i wouldnt wonder why they are shooting. As for chicagoes killing gangs .... Legalizing every drug in the world wont stop gang culture they arent all rich look at the project areas its a mentality issue that rest with the cultures and media industry glorifying violence. Theres no help for peolple who enjoy violence and where raised that way.

How many gang members are killing each other over alcohol? It is the turf wars that the drug gangs fight to sell drugs in certain areas that raise all the body counts. Take the income away from the gangs and they wouldnt even be able to afford bullets. What would the incentive be then to kill the guy standing on a certain street corner?

If you dont think the very lucrative drug trade is what is causing most of the urban violence I dont think you have thought it through.

 

[UncleBuck]

How many gang members are killing each other over alcohol? It is the turf wars that the drug gangs fight to sell drugs in certain areas that raise all the body counts. Take the income away from the gangs and they wouldnt even be able to afford bullets. What would the incentive be then to kill the guy standing on a certain street corner?

If you dont think the very lucrative drug trade is what is causing most of the urban violence I dont think you have thought it through.

yes, that's a genius idea. take the income away from people so they are poorer and thus fight less.

because crime and poverty are in no way directly correlated.



jesus christ, some people's children.

 

[Harrekin]

yes, that's a genius idea. take the income away from people so they are poorer and thus fight less.

because crime and poverty are in no way directly correlated.



jesus christ, some people's children.

So you support the sale and distribution of drugs like heroin, crack and crystal methamphetamine cos it's provides an income for people?

No offense, but that's fucked in the head, man...

Are you aware that providing the drugs to addicts for FREE is a hugely lower overall $$$ cost than drug-dependent related crime?

 

[Red1966]

"There is no reason in the world to carry a gun for Neighborhood Watch," said Chris Tutko, a retired police chief who now directs Neighborhood Watch for the sheriffs' association. "It gets people more into trouble than out of it." A manual published by the association for its "USAonWatch" program makes that very clear. "It should be emphasized to members that they do not possess police powers and they shall not carry weapons or pursue vehicles," the manual states. "Members should never confront suspicious persons who could be armed and dangerous."

If Zimmerman followed the advice of your retired cop who always carried a gun when HE was on duty, he may very well have met his death at the hands of Martin that night. Reciting the opinion of someone who agrees with you doesn't really bolster your case. Zimmerman was within his rights to carry his weapon. He was within his rights to defend himself. Martin had no right to attack Zimmerman. Zimmerman was the victim here, not Martin. Your white guilt or whatever you want to call it, is causing you to ignore that. We even have idiots trying to pretend that Martin was such an angel that he went to the store to buy Skittles for his little brother. Despite the fact that the Skittles were opened and in Martins stomach, according to the autopsy report.

 

[UncleBuck]

If Zimmerman followed the advice of your retired cop who always carried a gun when HE was on duty, he may very well have met his death at the hands of Martin that night. Reciting the opinion of someone who agrees with you doesn't really bolster your case. Zimmerman was within his rights to carry his weapon. He was within his rights to defend himself. Martin had no right to attack Zimmerman. Zimmerman was the victim here, not Martin. Your white guilt or whatever you want to call it, is causing you to ignore that. We even have idiots trying to pretend that Martin was such an angel that he went to the store to buy Skittles for his little brother. Despite the fact that the Skittles were opened and in Martins stomach, according to the autopsy report.

it would be impossible for martin to have attacked zimmerman, his only option in the face of an unidentified, creepy stranger following him in the dark after he ran was self defense.

i know you're a huge racist, red, but even black children have the right to defend themselves from creepy strangers that follow them in the dark.

secondly, there is absolutely zero evidence that martin attacked zimmerman. there is a lot more evidence to believe that zimmerman attacked martin, since after all, zimmy was the one chasing after martin, who was running away.

but all the facts in the world won't convince a racist like red. see my sig.

 

[Red1966]

let's see, he followed a person who was running away. they have a phrase for that, red.

Verb	1.	chase after*- pursue someone sexually or romanticallychase court,*romance,*solicit,*woo*- make amorous advances towards; "John is courting Mary"
	2.	chase after*- go after with the intent to catch; "The policeman chased the mugger down the alley"; "the dog chased the rabbit"

Your citation disproves your statement. But you already knew that.

 

[Bombur]

yes, that's a genius idea. take the income away from people so they are poorer and thus fight less.

because crime and poverty are in no way directly correlated.



jesus christ, some people's children.

You don't honestly believe ending drug prohibition would increase gang related crime do you?