Stand Up To Stand Your Ground

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
I don't see many reports of elderly women being ruthlessly attacked on the street. White people are hated. It is very simple. White men above all. Spend a few decades apologizing for hundreds of years of rape and murder and the way minorities view you will change. White people need guns because they live their lives in fear and nothing else. The big bad boogie man is coming for you.

I'm willing to bet you were not around during the hundreds of years of atrocities.
It may be difficult for some people to be above hatred, as seen in this thread, but why walk around hating people who have never hurt nor affected you in any way?

Is it because someone hurt someone a hundred years ago? Based upon that logic, be prepared for a dirty dangerous world. Every single person
in this world could use some centuries old issue and use it as a vehicle/excuse for their own hate.

Im, not minimizing or disputing the horrible things that happened to people, what I am saying is that there comes a time to move forward.
I as a white man have never harmed or hurt you so why hate me because of the color of my skin?

Wasted words fallen upon deaf ears, but I still felt the need to inject some reason.
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
dude in my town guy A. .got a little to much attention from a drunk, guy B, who was wrestling in the fron t yard . .. . drunk follwoed him home and guy shot him . .. . . .dude lived . .but wtf . . . .Guy A shoudl have just gone inside or taken a lick . . .or given one . .no need to shoot kid(i knwo him kinda asshole) in the gut and each leg . . .haha josh

if you cant take a lick or give one . . . try not to instigate drama . . .and dont bring a gun . .. . .it rarely does any good . . .
See, now I don't agree with just shooting someone just cause. I carry, but I will throw down before I pull my sidearm, unless they pull a knife or some other inanimate object.
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
See, now I don't agree with just shooting someone just cause. I carry, but I will throw down before I pull my sidearm, unless they pull a knife or some other inanimate object.
i bet zimmerpuss said the same pretentious BS . . . then . . .2cm gash and they scared for their life time

you keep acting like what i say applies to you . . . .. and im not sure why
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
i bet there is a lot studies havent shown you yet . . .

the truth is out there
Eh, I'm uninterested in studies of that nature. Kinda seems pointless imo. I'll just stay uninformed about these sorts of things...Besides, I rather life experience than some study that I myself didn't participate in.
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
who rolls a kid downa hallway . . . . .if you beat someone in a mutaul fight . .. . kudos . . .if you jsut torture people . . .go fight for air under water
LoL... It wasn't even a fight, it was horse play and I made it even funnier by rolling him down the hallway.
i bet zimmerpuss said the same pretentious BS . . . then . . .2cm gash and yalls scared for your life time

you keep actign liek what i say applies to you . . . .. and im not sure why
Not really, was just saying how there is a time to fight and a time to shoot and if zimmerman felt that was his time to shoot, who is anyone to know besides himself cause no one really knows what was going through his head at the time. Except maybe a slab of concrete. :wink:
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
LoL... It wasn't even a fight, it was horse play and I made it even funnier by rolling him down the hallway.

Not really, was just saying how there is a time to fight and a time to shoot and if zimmerman felt that was his time to shoot, who is anyone to know besides himself cause no one really knows what was going through his head at the time. Except maybe a slab of concrete. :wink:


i just take issue with the perception of needing to shoot vs run leave or even loosing said fight . .. . . .a person in panic is normally a bit bias to what is imminent danger or not . ..

humans are very fallible . .no need to create more laws that play on the sense of perception giving people a false reality of legality and legit aggression . . .. its psychology really . .. i suggest everyone get real familiar with the Stanford prison experiment if you dont thing people will make up whatever reason to act depending on the stimuli
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
I am uninterested in studies that are probably paid for with my tax dollars to figure out if the majority of man of any race is a pussy.
not really , do you have any idea on how the academic community works . . . .your tax dollars go to china . . .silly

not grants for studies on strength of man/poeple
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
What's the measure?... criminality?
Probably, to make it a justifiable study. :dunce:

i just take issue with the perception of needing to shoot vs run leave or even loosing said fight . .. . . .a person in panic is normally a bit bias to what is imminent danger or not . ..

humans are very fallible . .no need to create more laws that play on the sense of perception giving people a false reality of legality and legit aggression . . .. its psychology really . .. i suggest everyone get real familiar with the Stanford prison experiment if you dont thing people will make up whatever reason to act depending on the stimuli
I honestly don't believe that the majority of people would create a scenario on how they are going to use the SYG law to go around killing people "legally".
not really , do you have any idea on how the academic community works . . . .your tax dollars go to china . . .silly

not grants for studies on strength of man/poeple
I'm basing all this on what you have said thus far. :lol:
 

stoned cockatoo

New Member
the avg guy, white, or whatever is a pussy and cant take a lick or give one . .. . . .
the same thing can be said about the average black guy, skin colour has nothing to do with fighting ability. Genetics will to a degree but not the genes that choose skin colour.

environment and practice or training determines how could anyone can fight.

a person who grows up in a rough area and is forced to fight would destroy a person who has never had to worry about even thinking of throwing a punch.

maybe there are a lot more black people who can fight better then a white person, but if that's the case I believe that's a reflection of the average blacks environmental upbringing

skin colour has nothing to do with it
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
How is it that whenever I respond to you using a quote of yours there is always more text than what was originally there? Are you a wizard?
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
the same thing can be said about the average black guy, skin colour has nothing to do with fighting ability. Genetics will to a degree but not the genes that choose skin colour.

environment and practice or training determines how could anyone can fight.

a person who grows up in a rough area and is forced to fight would destroy a person who has never had to worry about even thinking of throwing a punch.

maybe there are a lot more black people who can fight better then a white person, but if that's the case I believe that's a reflection of the average blacks environmental upbringing

skin colour has nothing to do with it

i noticed you stopped reading at white(while reading my quote . . please continue) . . thanks for agreeing with me
 

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
Probably, to make it a justifiable study. :dunce:


I honestly don't believe that the majority of people would create a scenario on how they are going to use the SYG law to go around killing people "legally".

I'm basing all this on what you have said thus far. :lol:
premeditation of SYG when acting is less important to a law designed to incorporate logical fallacy into its definition(perception and human variable are to contrasting to be defines so callously ) . . self defense works fine when threatened with lethal action . . .no need to create a law that dictates your two feet create a area that you can defend at all cost . . .thats just silly when self defense is already a legal defense when it applies . .. . . no nee dfor piggy back law . . .
 

SirGreenThumb

Well-Known Member
premeditation of SYG when acting is less important to a law designed to incorporate logical fallacy into its definition(perception and human variable are to contrasting to be defines so callously ) . . self defense works fine when threatened with lethal action . . .no need to create a law that dictates your two feet create a area that you can defend at all cost . . .thats just silly when self defense is already a legal defense when it applies . .. . . no nee dfor piggy back law . . .
I agree. There is no need for a piggy back law as it really serves no purpose.
 
Top