abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
I bet they argue and then make friends.
Sure he did, look at his fingers in close ups, same fingers in the pics with his face in it, it's himAnd this is why Buck didn't actually post a picture of himself.
Look at bucks REAL arms, the pics where he is fondling his plants. They look nothing like the scraggly limp things the guy in the pic has.Sure he did, look at his fingers in close ups, same fingers in the pics with his face in it, it's him
I did, his arms aren't that big in those photos either, but those fingers are a dead give away, bro.Look at bucks REAL arms, the pics where he is fondling his plants. They look nothing like the scraggly limp things the guy in the pic has.
I bet you're wrong as usual ABI bet they argue and then make friends.
now that is super homo.I bet if Buck actually shows up he uses the Zimmerman defense when explaining why he had to shoot Trayvon Hemlock....I can hear it now, " But officer, he had TWO guns, one on his right arm and one on his left arm. Manly guns."
i made three claims:This is a lie typical of all of UB's "facts"
You know it seems your the one who always interpets what people say as gay or homo...Maybe its you and not EVERYONE else. Yeah thats it.now that is super homo.
some dude was just fantasizing about your "manly arms", it doesn't get much gayer than that.You know it seems your the one who always interpets what people say as gay or homo...Maybe its you and not EVERYONE else. Yeah thats it.
I'm not speaking of one instance and he was talking about your arms. You get it wrong everytime and then you have to go on a rampage of posts to try and discredit. And BTW I can find news articles to back up all my facts as well quoting the Miami herald is not a solid source. Saying that drug testing costs more than it would save is just stupid but that's how you think.some dude was just fantasizing about your "manly arms", it doesn't get much gayer than that.
you should work on that reading comprehension of yours.he was talking about your arms.
i'm so sorry that facts upset you so much.You get it wrong everytime and then you have to go on a rampage of posts to try and discredit. And BTW I can find news articles to back up all my facts as well quoting the Miami herald is not a solid source. Saying that drug testing costs more than it would save is just stupid but that's how you think.
Oh now the NYT an even worse source.you should work on that reading comprehension of yours.
I bet if Buck actually shows up he uses the Zimmerman defense when explaining why he had to shoot Trayvon Hemlock....I can hear it now, " But officer, he had TWO guns, one on his right arm and one on his left arm. Manly guns."
want to read that again and register another opinion?
i'm so sorry that facts upset you so much.
florida tried drug testing welfare recipients, it cost them more to do the testing than they saved by booting druggies (most of whom tested positive for cannabis).
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=0
From July through October in Florida — the four months when testing took place before Judge Scriven’s order — 2.6 percent of the state’s cash assistance applicants failed the drug test, or 108 of 4,086, according to the figures from the state obtained by the group. The most common reason was*marijuana*use. An additional 40 people canceled the tests without taking them.
Because the Florida law requires that applicants who pass the test be reimbursed for the cost, an average of $30, the cost to the state was $118,140. This is more than would have been paid out in benefits to the people who failed the test, Mr. Newton said.
As a result, the testing cost the government an extra $45,780, he said.
You are not a paragon of respect yourself. I made my first comment to you in this thread respectfully and you proceeded to disrespect. Your tough guy talk is no match for a good plan.Oh now the NYT an even worse source.
In the long run Buck this would have worked out differently. But with all the litigation it was to costly. But that's not what we are talking about is it Buck its you that we are talking about you. You and your total disrespect for people. See ya in a few hours. I wanna see if that mouth of yours runs face to face.
how is it disrespectful to correct your misunderstanding of the facts? i am doing your dumb ass a favor so you don't appear so foolish in the future when around people who do not originate from the south.Oh now the NYT an even worse source.
In the long run Buck this would have worked out differently. But with all the litigation it was to costly. But that's not what we are talking about is it Buck its you that we are talking about you. You and your total disrespect for people. See ya in a few hours. I wanna see if that mouth of yours runs face to face.
i really hope he tries to assault me to prove the extent of the intellect that most of you right wing racists have.While I agree that Buck is a major asshole and completely lacking in manners, I don't think a fist fight is a good way to settle things between you guys. I would hate to see Buck go missing for a few days while he recuperates.
I suggest you guys drink a beer and agree to disagree.
Just my two cents worth.
Ever heard of "fighting words", Buck? You might think you are blameless here, but you're not. It might be time to act like an adult. Just my two cents...i really hope he tries to assault me to prove the extent of the intellect that most of you right wing racists have.
plus, i would sue him for just about everything he has.
asking someone if they are homosexual does not constitute fighting words.Ever heard of "fighting words", Buck? You might think you are blameless here, but you're not. It might be time to act like an adult. Just my two cents...
I tried..............asking someone if they are homosexual does not constitute fighting words.
asking someone if facts somehow do not apply in the southern united states are not fighting words.
pointing out that someone is lying, mistaken, or deluded is not an example of fighting words.
i know you feel sorry for your friend, since racists stick together, but if he chooses to lash out violently because he lacks the mental faculties to engage in any sort of actual debate, that is on him at this point.