and 5 words to rebut 7 pages worth of long winded kynes bullshit (which he made purposely long because he needs to heap a lot of bullshit on top of bullshit in order to create the baffling effect that his arguments (see: republican talking points) require).
how's that working out for ya so far in life?
5 words he'll likely call a chomskyan word salad.
if you actually believe that saying "when they dont have money" actually rebutts anything then you are a fool.
Oh look, kkkynes is getting Tldr'd again.
That is so true, can't figure abandon out, he says some good things and then it all falls apart, it's strange because he is definitely intelligent I just wonder what is holding him back, I think I know, but I don't want to get into another argument. Peace abandon, you seem like a decent guy mate and I am learning loads and loads of stuff from you.
to be a part of any society you must accept the rules laid out by the ruling body (often not even a "Class", but elected leaders) or you can go off into the wilderness.
In a system without any guranteed minimum income. In a system of guaranteed minimum income, there's no reason to believe that would be true.
Most wealthy people were not born wealthy. They became wealthy because they produced. Are you saying people who produce should have all of their consequent wealth confiscated so that they're forced to produce again? If so, what incentive would anyone have to produce?
They produce paychecks so that other people can survive. You seem to keep missing that point.
