Search results

Who are the establishment GOP in Congress that'll toss him under the bus? I haven't heard of too many of them with actual power and are on the committees that Mueller reports to.

I'm a little more pessimistic. I see things getting much worse. I think Mueller and his team might find actual, hard evidence, and then I could also see Congress ignoring it. Congress is controlled by the GOP and they like having King Donald I the dumbass in the WH because he'll sign whatever...

You mean you're a homicidal maniac? I thought you were a cop! Now I know.

Okay, so back to insults. That's fine, I don't care. Insult away...just don't understand how that advances your cause...

Certainly you've understood by now that in America, it doesn't make one fuck of a difference what the public supports. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/10769041/The-US-is-an-oligarchy-study-concludes.html

Wow, what an about-face. But thanks! I was expecting more insults.

Yes, in the 1980s, the federales wanted all states to raise the drinking age to 21. There were several holdouts, and once the feds threatened the states' federal highway funds, very quickly state legislatures began writing potential laws to be consistent with federal law.

Wow, what a story. Usual experiences of mine is that the owners of the means of production rarely if ever have their comeuppance.

It's an assumption that the states will ignore it. From my understanding, all of the legal states have a sizeable contingent of people, powerful people, who want weed re-criminalized. And we have history to go on with this. When Orval Faubus, George Wallace and Ross Barnett (governors) defied...

I agree, and we also have an army of state jackboots and many different state bureaus of narcotics that are itching for the federal order to crackdown on weed, whether in legal or illegal states. It would make more sense for Jeff Secessions's states' rights ideology to empower staties to do the...

Called federal court injunction, and the feds have used it over and over to make states comply with federal law. There's a long history of jurisprudence on this. There will be a fight. Some states will appeal any injunction, but that could take years, and eventually, with the GOP stacked courts...

But they won't use federal cops to do it. It'll be more efficient to empower the eager staties to do it, and it foments statie loyalty to the federales.

How do you know my ego is fragile? When did I write anything about your age? And, what is the point of you insulting me over and over and over? What does that do for you? How does it advance your cause? How does it advance your affinity for a thoughtless society? Why are you opposed to...

I'm sorry you find thinking inconvenient. But the future's yours. Hope you enjoy.

Yes, I agree. It's very possible that Jeff Secessions could order the state authorities to start searching homes door to door (there'll be exemptions for the homes of the wealthy).

I know not to waste my time on those who don't think.

I love it when folks support my argument for me. You are obviously a post-cognitive person.

So insulting people on internet forums is supposed to do what for you? How are you winning friends and influencing folks online by just launching insults at them? How is that method working for you?

And overall, it really sucks that something which is legal in several states and the nation's capitol is illegal in many other parts of the country and the cops there practice zero tolerance (in fact, in some areas, weed interdiction is the only law enforcing that goes on). But all this will be...

Question: What happened to your former employer and their family. Their business went belly up but that was an LLC, right? They're still rich, right? Not disagreeing with anything you wrote, just curious about the fate of the wealth after the exploited stood up to them. Usually in this country...