May I suggest that what JC has done and is doing is a coordinated effort with the Cdn govt.
Let that thought sink in for a sec....
It wouldn't be the first time "compromises" were made by lawyers when dealing with HC ( A Young for example )
But they didn't have to did they?
The SCOC Smith has nothing to do with production of or supply, just patient's right to possess and consume.
HC fast tracked it for the LPs, when has HC fast tracked anything for patients?
"Here's the thing Health Canada hates LP's just as much as Dispenceries"...I don't think so....ramming schd 56 for LP extraction production was not SCOC forced.
This is a typical HC tactic.
Like when the SCOC said you have to allow DGs to be able to produce for more than one patient. HC took one full year to change it to TWO patients. Obviously not what the SCOC intended.
This is another example. The SCOC says patients can have it, and HC comes back...