Search results

If religion and spirituality get their own section, shouldn't atheism, rationalism, and education have a section?

Even religious people are horrified by their religious ancestors who worshipped the same god and lived by the same rules. Then they just attribute it to being a "different time back then" and not to the church having significantly more political power.

Religion is like an abusive relationship. It uses fear to keep you in line, but tells you that it's really just intense love. "I love you baby, but sometimes I just get so angry and I have to hurt someone." "God loves you, but sometimes you make him angry and he tortures you for eternity."...

Aquarius is so emo. Chicken entrails are where the real power is.

Of course you could also be a prolific Poe spamming nonsense to show that spirituality and religion are the worthless contemplation of intangibles. If so, you are doing a fantastic job, and are very Poe-worthy :)

Well, you're probably mentally ill, but that would necessarily make you paranoid.

It's not a math problem. It's garbage philosophy, pretending to seek an answer but not even posing a question. Your questions are no more valid than "Why is a house?", "When is purple?, or "What time is broccoli?" Your posts are irrational spam.

Still waiting on substantiation of the scientist claim. What field of study is the degree in? Does anyone else get the feeling this is Mauihund posting under a new nick? Uses the same pseudo-philosophical garbage like his "atheism cannot exist if 'God' is not real" tripe.

Pacemakers are evidence of heart control. Religion is evidence of mind control.

The "Laws" of the internet. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/6408927/Internet-rules-and-laws-the-top-10-from-Godwin-to-Poe.html How many have you seen in the forums lately? :)

Bacon is optional, but encouraged. :) Lactose free substitutes are acceptable. Consider it the Buddhism of the cereal worship realm. :P

Doctrine states that Captain Crunch is part of a "complete breakfast". It is not the whole, it is only a part of the whole. Without the orange juice, toast, and condiments it is simply half-hearted appeasement for the nutrition of the soul. And ye shall remain seated, lest ye spill the milk...

35 grams? Dayum! :) My old roommates considered me the "cook" for that stuff and I never cooked with more than 3 or 4 grams at a time. I'd make the batches suitable for a package of Pillsbury cookie dough. So I'd use the required amount, but margarine instead of butter since it's more fat for...

Hmmm. If this angel method requires a critical mass then Christianity is in trouble. Since a large percentage have believed that Christ was returning in every generation, but weren't sufficient in mass to initiate it, it would seem that the notable decrease in Christianity and the sudden rise...

If you went by population statistics alone, then 70% of crimes would be perpetrated by the religious (nutjobs aside). Oddly, the percentage is much higher. edit: had to run out for a minute. my stats are from 1997, so let me grab newer stats from the Bureau of Prisons. D'oh, the stats aren't...

He's using "Remote Viewing" to establish the ideology of those involved. It's a secret handed down to only the highest level Christians in Xenu's army. Maybe with his cosmic Christian powers he can explain why the ratio of Christians vs. Atheists in prisons is heavily skewed, with the prison...

From his portrayal, Jesus probably would have been a socialist. But pointing that out would likely get you shot in some states.

The danger of learning neuroscience from forwarded emails. http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/10percent.asp

Which university/college did you get your science degree from? You can define yourself as the consort of Alexander the Great as well. It doesn't mean anything. My suspicion is that you're one of the users involved in the atheism/faith argument just spamming faith based nonsense posts under a...

It's not being on the same jury that scares me. It's being in the defendants box. If there is the potential for someone to decide your guilt or make a sentence recommendation based on faith rather than evidence, that corrupts the whole point of having a system of evidence in the first place.