gudkarma
New Member
hold on a sec.He did a side by side in two rooms and the 12/1 yielded crappy small buds.
he did 12/1 in flower?
i thought the orignal intention here is veg.
hold on a sec.He did a side by side in two rooms and the 12/1 yielded crappy small buds.
the 12/1 thing has a couple parts. one for veg, and another for flower. i dont remember the numbers for flower but its not 12/12hold on a sec.
he did 12/1 in flower?
i thought the orignal intention here is veg.
12-1 veg and flower decreasing hours by 1/2 hour per weeks seems to often be used consecutively, however, they are not the same thing. One can do one with out doing the other. Using 12-1 allowed me to keep my plants though the summer heat other wise it would have had to completely shut down. But I have no complaint about my plant growth.the 12/1 thing has a couple parts. one for veg, and another for flower. i dont remember the numbers for flower but its not 12/12
well if your running 1000watt you produceing pretty much same lumens. Not true the sun blows a 1000 watt light out of the water.
referring to this quote haha sorry didn't realize what page i was one, and didn't even realize how many pages this thread had. now subbinghahahahha.... Are you serious? 150kwh?. Son go back to school. 5hrs at 1000wph = 5kw. which is $.50 (A DAY) which ends up being $15 per month.
I get a giggle out of someone pulling 12oz. harvests making comments on my grow. If I want to pull 2oz. per plant, I will try your techniqueI'll be sure to try this if I want sad looking stretched out plants...
I always get a giggle from people who judge their growth rate by height.
obviously reducing light during flowering will not destroy the crop, small adjustments like this, based on a 24 hour circadian rhythm, replicate nature. they may also reduce total yield proportionally to the loss of light, that is logic anyways. I think you misunderstand what the "haters" point is. That a 12/1 or 13 hour circadian rhythm, is not natural and the timer issues are not worth it, especially when many veg for a week or two, then flip to flower. And even more so because many of us keep mother plants and seed plants with our veg clones.View attachment 1811230View attachment 1811229View attachment 1811228View attachment 1811227Quick update for the lovers and the haters. 22 days since I switched to 11-13, and 8 days since i went to 10 1/2-13 1/2. Trichomes already producing.
Not considering you a hater Matt, I have much respect for your input. I will see what my overall yield is on this one, then I will decide if I will just use this in veg. The haters I am talking about are the ones that say my plants look like shit and will herm on me. I just want to show this works. I will not be keeping my mothers on this schedule, just my babies in veg because of heat issues.obviously reducing light during flowering will not destroy the crop, small adjustments like this, based on a 24 hour circadian rhythm, replicate nature. they may also reduce total yield proportionally to the loss of light, that is logic anyways. I think you misunderstand what the "haters" point is. That a 12/1 or 13 hour circadian rhythm, is not natural and the timer issues are not worth it, especially when many veg for a week or two, then flip to flower. And even more so because many of us keep mother plants and seed plants with our veg clones.
Mr.Grønn;6370064 said:@OP: The lightning schedule you describe during veg doesn't make sense to me. I'll let someone else test that first
But regarding flowering, this is what I've experienced:
I've done two grows in a row now, with identical plants.
First time: 12/12 all the way.
Second time: 12/12 at first, then 11 hours on/13 hours off, then 10/14 the last two weeks.
Result:
1. time: 12/12 gave better yield.
2. time: Finished about 10 days faster, but with less yield (don't know exact weight, but it was obvious to the eye. Maybe 10% less.).
This was just my experience, with my Indica Afghan-dominated strains. Result might differ with other strains.