31% of Americans Have No Retirement Savings

Doer said:

You guys are assuming they will even check.

If you don't say anything, they cannot check.

Click to expand...

Doer said:

No you are just guessing.

I on the other hand, am a Sr. Mgr at a big Tech company and have hired and terminated, around 50 people. Not all I hired were terminated, only a few, but there were others I let go for cause.

There is no national data base of criminal record by name. Not legal, or there would be. It is state by state.

If you don't say anything they cannot check.

In CA, because we all know this, they can't even ask. If they can't ask they have nothing to check. And with this ruling, it means checking is not allowed, iac.

Click to expand...

Doer said:

You guys are assuming they will even check.

If you don't say anything, they cannot check.

Click to expand...

bigbuddin84 said:

Here you said you hired and fired 50 people. In the same breath, you say if you don't disclose a felony, they can't even check. How in hell could someone who works in a big company, and does hiring even THINK this was true. I have had 3 different jobs after college. None asked me if they could do background checks. Guess what? They all did. Just like almost all reputable companies do. And you rant on and on about how it is illegal to do so. But yet, you hire so many people. How in hell could someone that intimately close to this subject be so far off base? Because he is full of shit. Its pretty obvious. I mean who has to lie on a forum. Does it really make you feel better?

I'll link the thread ONCE MORE. Maybe you will read it. Probably not. But hopefully others will and see how much you are contradicting yourself. It's quite comical if you actually real through it all, and see the crap you say.

https://www.rollitup.org/t/moving-w-felony-conviction.765881/

There is no need to link what you said again. I did it for you.

Click to expand...

Doer said:

If you have something against this...neither is pot, asshole.

You are not welcome around here.

Click to expand...

bigbuddin84 said:

I'm not trying to get a pot related job. Do you have comprehension issues? Do you not even understand what is being talked about here? You were shown as the idiot you are, and you got mad. Get over it

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

exactly how tiny is your tiny, tiny, deformed penis?

Click to expand...

Doer said:

Do you know you are being turd?

I don't get mad. It interferes with vicious.

You want to run your mouth at me.

What do you do for a living, baby boy? Suck on yo mamma?

Click to expand...

bigbuddin84 said:

You want me to reveal what I do, so you can TRY to discredit me. I have no need for that, you have clearly discredited yourself

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

i'm guessing 3.5 inches erect.

Click to expand...

SmokeyDan said:

I'm not, don't even know if you have one.

Just don't know why you respond to every thing I say like I pissed in your cheerios.

Click to expand...

Doer said:

Living at home and slinging shit.

Digging up all those stupid RIU techiques.

Who were you before? Kandahar? May0?

Click to expand...

Doer said:

Its all up from here for you, fragment. You want to appear smarter. Good start.

Click to expand...

Doer said:

Here is what I said BITCH.
----------------------------
Very soon, it will be illegal to even ask.

In fact, already in my State, this is happening.
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/State-job-applications-won-t-ask-about-criminal-4885798.php
People who seek jobs with state or local government agencies in California will not be asked on their initial applications whether they have been convicted of a crime, under legislation that was signed into law Thursday by Gov. Jerry Brown.

AB218 by Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, effective in July, will prohibit most government employers from requiring disclosure of past convictions on initial applications, information that often ends any realistic job prospects. Supporters promoted the bill as offering a second chance to ex-offenders.
-------------------------

And if you think I am in HR, or that HR does hiring in Big Companies, you have a floor mop or ditch dig mentality and will never rise above that no matter what.

You have to be able to read then think to comprehend. And to be at my position in life you would have to get past your massive hate.

Only Buck has been able to sling posts back at people and stay on point. He is a Forum Master at that beyond all I've seen.

You fail at even posting. Stick to your content if any. RUI is about supply not demand, BITCH.

So, What the FUCK does ITT tech and learning a skill, have to do with all your hatred?

And you are just drooling over Sunni, IAC. Jealous much? Did I show you up, so you are chasing your tail now?

Click to expand...

Doer said:

I don't think background checks are not legal.

Snappy come back. The worm crawls.

Click to expand...

Doer said:

No you are just guessing.

I on the other hand, am a Sr. Mgr at a big Tech company and have hired and terminated, around 50 people. Not all I hired were terminated, only a few, but there were others I let go for cause.

There is no national data base of criminal record by name. Not legal, or there would be. It is state by state.

If you don't say anything they cannot check.

In CA, because we all know this, they can't even ask. If they can't ask they have nothing to check. And with this ruling, it means checking is not allowed, iac.

Click to expand...