I'll bet you cannot backup your comment with a citation, in fact I know you can't
He "loaned" the money in fact. Spouting another lie to distract from your other lies ain't going to work.
So who was he talking about? ? ? So, maybe he was talking about him?
They won't believe what comes out of Chuck Schumer's own mouth, but they know exactly what a Fox commentator is insinuating.
Question: "I wonder how big their confidence interval is with a sample of that size?" Stupid answer: "The answer to that question is no."
You never ask Cheezy, Buckhead, or any of the other libtards for a citation. When given a citation, you try to change the subject. No one can take you seriously.
You demand an unbiased news source, knowing full well there are none. Your ploy is too transparent. Oh, yeah. Flog them until the offending parties are prosecuted or removed from office. Are you claiming the video of Schumer demanding the IRS become the attack dog of the Democrat party is just a fabrication by Fox news?
no offense..i post in other areas..it's not all about you..
There is a difference from being bias and just getting it fucking wrong with lies and misinformation. Fox is not only bias but lies and spreads incorrect information.
so much so, THEY ROLL IT IN THE CREDITS..you should stick around for it
Now you're claiming AbandonConflict is a right winger? You so funny.
No...................
class act all the way:
It's 15%. And you misrepresent that as being all profit, when in fact, all their operating costs come out of that 15%. So it's entirely possible there is no profit at all, possibly even a loss, which will end up in further tax money being given to the insurance companies as the ACA guarantees the government will make up any losses. And there was no popular vote, so, no, we didn't vote on it.
Actually, it was YOU demanding "non-partisan" citations. Jackass.i noticed how no one answered this other than you and it was the righties of this forum screaming that they needed non-partisan..jackasses
20% revenue from one policy is well more than they deserve which is why 80% of effective premium MUST go towards your healthcare..
citation required.
So "we" has now become "you"? ACA had not even been written in 2008. And, according to every poll I've heard of, 60% of the population was AGAINST ACA when it was passed. And it was a benifit to the children of servicemen before it was reworded, not an "Affordable Care Act". This was done so it could be passed as a budget reconciliation, not on its own merits. And of somewhat questionable legality.