Roy O'Bannon
Well-Known Member
Migrow has a bunch of light testing on his channel. He is a real good explainer and shows his data.
Its easy to just say. Have you really tried out what led can give once you properly adjust the spectrum? I would say leds seem to be the standard of the market here tbh: you can even see some strains start to only look good under leds nowadays from breeding them under leds.HIDs today are the golden std of light making.
No other light source can compare, not yet.
LEDs do make more light but for the price of emitting excessive and dangerous radiation (RF, EMF) which is damaging tissues in humans, plants and animals.
That's why LED bud doesn't "hit the mouth right" sort of speak.
If you wish to have a sun like light source in your grows, go HIDs, if you can handle the heat, no other light source other than the sun can come close.
280nm is hype, not even their own spectrograph gives them any coverage lower then 320nm. Not sure what part of +750nm you would like to have built in to your base spectrum tbh; its all infra red, could just as well be added thru incandescent?Hortilux Blue-MMS Halide, both have a spectrum of 280nm-2500+.
NO LED has such a broad spectrum. What?? 380nm-750nm at best? Not even close to an HID.
Is there something other than "trust me bro" behind this? Whats the difference between one watt of HID red and Led red after they have been emitted from the light? What RF interference are you talking about? We harvest with radio on and we can hear when the phone rings in the speaker but nothing from the leds or the drivers; no interference what so ever, nothing with standard tv and no complaints from the neighbours... I just wanna know what it is that your talking about, facts or your own led nightmares, cause what youre talking about doesn't seem to happen anywhere ive been. But i do know that some led drivers may be a bit dodgy with rf, just as some old hps ballasts.You are not understanding simple facts, growing with LEDs is like growing your plants under a microwave oven.
No spectrum change will change this fact.
No spectrum change will make led bud good, it's designed to "kill" everything.
LEDs don't grow essential oils from garlic, lavender, etc...
Weed is no different, it's a living tissue, but it's much more fragile, it's not a human being.
LEDs are the only light source that emits this harmful qty.
So, HIDs, not HPS, is still the golden std of sun like light sources today, the closest you'll get.
love it or hate it.
LEDs spread light better, and make more light, but that light is destructive to plants and essential oils.
Not really in a sense the light is destructive, but the following RF it emits is a major downfall.
Don't plants sit in uv radiation, from the sun, all day?You are not understanding simple facts, growing with LEDs is like growing your plants under a microwave oven.
No spectrum change will change this fact.
No spectrum change will make led bud good, it's designed to "kill" everything.
LEDs don't grow essential oils from garlic, lavender, etc...
Weed is no different, it's a living tissue, but it's much more fragile, it's not a human being.
LEDs are the only light source that emits this harmful qty.
There's a reason you see them everywhere in your life, they are a tool to radiate and harm your body and eyes, it was never about "saving power", if you don't believe this so called conspiracy, to each his own.. but it still don't change the fact it emits high levels of harming radiation.
So, HIDs, not HPS, is still the golden std of sun like light sources today, the closest you'll get.
love it or hate it.
LEDs spread light better, and make more light, but that light is destructive to plants and essential oils.
Not really in a sense the light is destructive, but the following RF it emits is a major downfall.
No link? Ill try to get into this and google when theres nothing important going on cause all this sounds like loonie tunes a bit. Anything at all you could say about those EMFs from leds? Wavelength? Source within the diode? Anything but "lord save us from the led"?That's why sitting in high sun will radiate you aswell, not so good right ?
The atmosphere is filtering most of the harmful rays of the sun anyways so it's very marginal as it is.
@Rocket Soul try to stick to the subject, it's not about difference in photons, a red is a red and so fourth no matter which light made it
But if that light is coupled with harmful EMF radiation, it's a microwave with added light making abilities.
You ever heard of a simple google or YouTube search ? Just write EMF from leds
Observe it's the only light source emitting those harmful qtys, ask yourself why and come back with answers
Yes, plants do love lights that emitt heat aswell as light. With leds comes an adaptation to this. Then seems to be fine. Also most incandescent or his have a continuous (all though very low in some places) coverage of the spectrum. Even hps has a small sliver of blue on one side. This is an argument why hid would be superior in some cases. I just make sure to cover all this anyways.Interesting. To be fair, the computer screen also emits harmful radiation....as do televisions and smartphones. Harmful radiation seems to be everywhere nowadays.
But, in my own experience, plants really do love HID light. I'm convinced it's the heat they emit in addition to the light.
I've said this before: Put two lights in an empty room -one being an LED and the other being an HID. Now put a cat in that room and wait about a half hour. Come back into the room and see where the cat is sitting. Life seeks warmth as well as light!
Having said that, I have gotten great results from my LED lights, as well. The buds grown under LED were also very sticky, oily and had a strong smell. I believe the real advantage to LEDs is that they are much less of a fire hazard than HID bulbs. I don't like being away from the grow, during lights-on time, when using HID bulbs. That's the trade off for me -safety.
Its more or less what youre saying?Comparing led to death rays is your best so far no doubt