kekapena
Active Member
Cool, cool.
click it or ticket
- Thread starter Total Head
- Start date
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
I'm directly implying the test is innately flawed because it wasn't a true test. lol COMPLETELY different than the real thing.
Thank you for answering a question that didn't have anything to do with you.
Hats off! 
kekapena
Active Member
Any test they run, will be considered "untrue" even if used with a "real" human being.I'm directly implying the test is innately flawed because it wasn't a true test. lol COMPLETELY different than the real thing.
Thank you for answering a question that didn't have anything to do with you.
Because we all react differently in high-pressured situations, like car-accidents.
Therefore the results of the accident will ALWAYS be different, therefore the use of a dummy over a live-person is not only pointless, but mute.
Watch "The Deadliest Warrior" - aside from the shows aspect, look at the technology used.
The "dummies" used/ran in these tests today aren't the SAME dummies from 1995.
They actually have bones that break, sensors that show speed, collision times, impact, pressure, blood loss, etc.
I'd say they're pretty damned accurate.
[edit]
I'm off this thread, so ... have fun continuing the debate dudes. Which, isn't much of a debate lol.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
How were the hundreds of thousands of crash tests performed for over half a century 'innately flawed'?I'm directly implying the test is innately flawed because it wasn't a true test. lol COMPLETELY different than the real thing.
Thank you for answering a question that didn't have anything to do with you.
Like I said, ignorance is ignorance, whether it's directed at me or not.
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
FACT: EVERYTHING stated in this thread is merely an opinion.
The*Mad*Hatter
Well-Known Member
i say if your that fat to not be able to wear a seatbelt...you should still be fine in a car wreck......fat people are like drunk people...when they get into a wreck, they always survive
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
[video=youtube;QsogswrH6ck]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsogswrH6ck[/video]
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
Yes, you may ask. I was driving my husband's Cadillac Fleetwood (big, big car) back in 1989, I should have been driving my Dodge Daytona (little car). I was hit head on by a drunk driver at speed with no sign of braking by him. The engine of the Cadillac ended up in the firewall of the Caddie, the dashboard warped and dropped down on my legs, the roof of the car buckled and the doors jammed. I swear I watched the windshield crack up in slow motion. The pickup truck that hit me it's motor ended up in it's passenger compartment with the firewall sheet metal wrapped around it. I did hit my head on something but what I don't know what everything was flying around.
I was told that with the speed of the impact that if I had been in my little car I would have been dead or crippled and I believe it. I wear a safety belt because I believe it save my life.
I was told that with the speed of the impact that if I had been in my little car I would have been dead or crippled and I believe it. I wear a safety belt because I believe it save my life.
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
Your response was as if I had asked a completely different question. LMFAO.
Winter Woman
Well-Known Member
So what? You wanted a response and I gave you one. How does one know for certain about anything. Stupid question if you ask me.
olylifter420
Well-Known Member
Just dont wear it.
Dont be so "girthy".
Dont drive.
Ride in the back seat.
Use a taxi.
Walk.
Bike.
Use the bus.
Use the subway(if applicable).
Stay home.
Exercise.
Eat better.
There just suggestions
And yes, i think it is a good law that should be enforced. It might save your life one day.
I wear it when i have to, im cool with it
Dont be so "girthy".
Dont drive.
Ride in the back seat.
Use a taxi.
Walk.
Bike.
Use the bus.
Use the subway(if applicable).
Stay home.
Exercise.
Eat better.
There just suggestions
And yes, i think it is a good law that should be enforced. It might save your life one day.
I wear it when i have to, im cool with it
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
Stupid is as stupid does. It was a simple question. So what? You couldn't answer a simple 'how'?
It was borderline rhetorical. You can't say that it's a fact if you DONT know...
In the words of our almighty Cannabineer,
[video=youtube;QsogswrH6ck]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsogswrH6ck[/video]
It's an opinion, my sarcasm was taken poorly and people set out to prove their opinion as fact.
It's not 'true' that seat belts are safer, it's your personal opinion.
So good luck forcing your opinion on me. 
lakew00d
Well-Known Member
I didnt read all this but, I think if an individual wants to die, let them, I choose not to wear one, because i itll do more damage to me, like if in a little crash youll still end up with shitty ass rashes along your chest.
I dont even imagine a big crash with one of those one. ive seen people with the bruises and damn it looks like it hurts.
I can see where it can save you, I know a lady who got in a wreck and she was throw out the window if she was wearing her seat belt she would have been crashed by the car.
Its all opinion.
I dont even imagine a big crash with one of those one. ive seen people with the bruises and damn it looks like it hurts.
I can see where it can save you, I know a lady who got in a wreck and she was throw out the window if she was wearing her seat belt she would have been crashed by the car.
Its all opinion.
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
It's a scientific, testable, measurable fact that wearing a seatbelt is safer than not if you get into a car accident. I'm not sure why you think it's simply an opinion but that isn't the case. Would you like me to provide you with some data?
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
Will it prove as much as all the other data stated in this thread?
Prefontaine
Well-Known Member
[video=youtube;pKclaFGzHKA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKclaFGzHKA[/video]
april
Pickle Queen
Well i've been in a car accident, lady in front of me decided to slam on the brakes while doing 80km/h in rush hour traffic, ya i slammed on my brakes and slammed into her rear end,opened my eyes and saw my car totaled , air bags did not deploy since my car did a nose dive and the front bumper went under the Jeeps rear bumper, i hit the spare tire lmfao Engine and trany were chrushed and pushed into my firewall, windshield did not shatter , but i feel that if i had not been wearing my eat belt properly or at all i probably would have ate my steering wheel instead i only had a few bruises. LMfao funny part was the first thing i did after the initial accident was find my weed lol
Total Head
Well-Known Member
i see the "yes you should be ticketed" group falls into 2 categories:
a. the first believes that it's the government's role to "save my life"
b. the other believes that since accidents cost money it is acceptable to fine people.
to group a, my question is whether or not i should be forced to wear a kevlar vest in the ghetto. and if i don't, and get shot, is that "my own fault" and subject to a fine?
to group b, i already covered the extensive fines i recieve just by running a red light. fines that go toward road accidents and are built into the base of my ticket before the actual violation is added. so basically i already paid for that shit. why is it i should be fined on top of that for money that goes into the same fund? and if i am a "safe driver" who never had an accident or ticket, why should i be lumped in with people who contribute to unsafe driving conditions?
just to clarify, i do wear the stupid thing about 60% of the time, and for the most part i believe that i'm probably better off with it on (although there are exceptions). my beef is with the government telling me what's best for me and double charging me for the same offense.
a. the first believes that it's the government's role to "save my life"
b. the other believes that since accidents cost money it is acceptable to fine people.
to group a, my question is whether or not i should be forced to wear a kevlar vest in the ghetto. and if i don't, and get shot, is that "my own fault" and subject to a fine?
to group b, i already covered the extensive fines i recieve just by running a red light. fines that go toward road accidents and are built into the base of my ticket before the actual violation is added. so basically i already paid for that shit. why is it i should be fined on top of that for money that goes into the same fund? and if i am a "safe driver" who never had an accident or ticket, why should i be lumped in with people who contribute to unsafe driving conditions?
just to clarify, i do wear the stupid thing about 60% of the time, and for the most part i believe that i'm probably better off with it on (although there are exceptions). my beef is with the government telling me what's best for me and double charging me for the same offense.
The Cryptkeeper
Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Well it is just science's opinion...Will it prove as much as all the other data stated in this thread?