Wait, what?
Well-Known Member
Everything has the intention to survive
does nature have intentionality?
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
how so?
you said i was lying about the fact that you posted nonsense from a white supremacy group.
so i literally posted the proof in the form of your citation of "colorofcrime.org", an offshoot of 'american renaissance', which is a white supremacy group started by jared taylor.
you said that it came from the FBI, but it didn't. you can't cite anything from the FBI that says the same thing that the white supremacists say.
you said wiki says the same thing, but it doesn't. i posted what wiki says, which is that crime is related to poverty and class rather than skin color.
so i ask you again, what am i lying about exactly?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Wait, what?
Well-Known Member
Oh. I was just explain my vote 
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
madamgreendumb decided to come in and pointlessly spam anti-semitic cartoons, so i figured i would remind everyone about his long history with white supremacy here on rollitup.
context is important.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Oh. I was just explain my vote
Go on......is a consciousness required to have this intention?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Most shit is already deleted by the time I login. Oh well.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Arrest data: FBI,
Crime in the United States, 2001
(USGPO, 2002), p. 252. FBI,
Crime in the United States, 2002
(USGPO, 2003), p. 252. FBI,
Crime in the United States, 2003
(USGPO, 2004), p. 288
Crime in the United States, 2001
(USGPO, 2002), p. 252. FBI,
Crime in the United States, 2002
(USGPO, 2003), p. 252. FBI,
Crime in the United States, 2003
(USGPO, 2004), p. 288
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Arrest data are from US, Dept. of Justice, Federal Bureauof Investigation (FBI),
Crime in the United States, 2002
[Thisis the official title of document that is based on the UniformCrime Reporting Program (UCR).] (Washington, DC: US Gov-ernment Printing Office [USGPO], 2003), p. 252. Unless oth-erwise indicated, all information about arrests in this report isfrom this source. Population data are from Population Divi-sion, US, Census Bureau (Census Bureau), “Annual Estimatesof the Population by Sex, Race and Hispanic or Latino Originfor the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004 (NC-EST2004-03)” (Washington, DC: Census Bureau, 2005), http:/ /www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2004/NC-EST2004-03.xls. Accessed July 11, 2005.
You sure you want me to keep this up? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHa
Crime in the United States, 2002
[Thisis the official title of document that is based on the UniformCrime Reporting Program (UCR).] (Washington, DC: US Gov-ernment Printing Office [USGPO], 2003), p. 252. Unless oth-erwise indicated, all information about arrests in this report isfrom this source. Population data are from Population Divi-sion, US, Census Bureau (Census Bureau), “Annual Estimatesof the Population by Sex, Race and Hispanic or Latino Originfor the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2004 (NC-EST2004-03)” (Washington, DC: Census Bureau, 2005), http:/ /www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2004/NC-EST2004-03.xls. Accessed July 11, 2005.
You sure you want me to keep this up? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHa
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Eh, there is no reason for me to post anymore..I do believe I have proved my point once again.
I believe that's checkmate!
But, you know he'll lie like usual and swear up and down later that he pwned you.
Nice job SirGreenThumb
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
I'm almost certain he will repeat the same lies about me.
Even though its quite obvious why I posted the color of crime a long time ago. He still feels as though I didn't bait him with that one.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
One of the biggest obstacles to understanding therelationship between race and crime is the failure of most national crime statistics to distinguish betweenHispanics and whites. The Uniform Crime Report-ing Program (UCR), which is the basis of the FBI’snational tabulation of arrests, puts most Hispanicsin the “white” category.
3
The National Crime Vic-timization Survey (NCVS), an extensive annual sur-vey of crime victims, classifies some Hispanic crimi-nals as white and some as “other race.” BecauseHispanics commit most crimes at higher rates thannon-Hispanic whites, lumping the two groups to-gether distorts the data
Whoops. Guess where that came from? Yep, colorofcrime, the place you claim was lying about the fbi. This was literally on the link that posted that I posted.
Ahem,,,, Idiot.
Now what bitch.
Stoking Fears About Interracial Crime — A Look at How Racists Do Math
Next, Taylor claims that most victims of black violent crime are white, and thus, that blacks are violently targeting whites. Furthermore, since only a small share of the victims of white criminals are black (only 4.4 percent in 2002, for example), this means that blacks are far more of a threat to whites than vice-versa. But there are several problems with these claims.
To begin with, the white victim totals in the Justice Department’s victimization data include those termed Hispanic by the Census, since nine in ten Latino/as are considered racially white by government record-keepers. Since Latinos and Latinas tend to live closer to blacks than non-Hispanic whites, this means that many “white” victims of “black crime” are Latino or Latina, and that in any given year, the majority of black crime victims would be people of color, not whites.
But even if we compute the white totals as Taylor does, without breaking out Hispanic victims of “black crime,” his position is without merit. In 2002, whites, including Latinos, were about 81.5 percent of the population (3). That same year, whites (including Latinos) were 51 percent of the victims of violent crimes committed by blacks, meaning that whites were victimized by blacks less often than would have been expected by random chance, given the extent to which whites were available to be victimized (4).
wooops! looks like you shot yourself in the foot.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there is only one problem with your new narrative: you yourself argued against that narrative initially.
witness: https://www.rollitup.org/politics/782999-bucks-bogart-illegal.html
in this thread, you try to claim that only i think that jared taylor, american renaissance, and colorofcrime are racist white supremacists. you try to argue that it's good information from good people, not white supremacists.
you quickly ducked out once i pointed ou tthat jared taylor himself is a white separatist.
so no, you were clearly not trying to bait me. you actually cited white supremacists in all seriousness thinking they were good sources of information.
only now do you try to change your reasoning for posting that to "it was bait".
you are a racist little weasel and more and more people are seeing it.
go cry now.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what you believe and what reality looks like are two vastly different things.
i have you on record stating that the polls were all skewed by the liberal media, and that obama's lead was a fictional creation of the liberal media.
https://www.rollitup.org/politics/567721-obamas-fake-lead-polls-exposed.html
the best part was how you continued to defend your failed theory long after it was shown to be a scam for idiots.
you are a joke.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
You seem mad..
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
please do continue to point out that the FBI stats do not say the same thing that the white supremacists you cite are saying.
i'm still waiting for you to point out where i lied, like you claimed.
i have justified myself with references and citations galore with respect to your love of manufactured, bullshit white supremacy "stats".
you have only been able to muster a cry of "liar" without ever demonstrating even once where i have lied or what i have lied about.
you are clown shoes, greendumb.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
You seem mad..
you don't seem to get what's going on here, but that is no surprise.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
What is going on here? If I say you're a snitch, do I get banned? That most certainly is not against the site rules, is it?
I know multiple accounts will do it........but here Buck still is.....what's up with that?
I know multiple accounts will do it........but here Buck still is.....what's up with that?
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
You are literally to stupid for words.
Now go ahead and keep repeating the same bullshit after you got owned. You think posting stupid shit from random people means anything? It doesn't and you obviously forgot what the original post was about.
Black people commit more crime as a whole. Its already been proven.
Its quite amusing that you will sit there and call me all sorts of a racist, yet your precious Obama is a racist himself.
Similar threads
