Do i have to fight all of you? COME ON! you should know that fact is thrown around in science all the time. The word "fact" is what makes science so trustworthy, so truthful, so stable. They said "FACT" about the whole thing that we as mammals all look the same when first in the womb and it was proven wrong because they jumped the gun it using the word "fact"
Oh I see what you are saying. That is the only evidence mentioned in that particular article which was more intended for the OP but if you want to nitpick with this micro/macro stuff here's something else.
Is this not just the study of evolution that is micro and macro? You are getting pretty worked up over the timelines people study. It does not make it different processes. Macro is the study after the branch. So say you study human genetics and how we changed once we became modern humans. So how we moved from africa to today. Where Micro just continues to follow those changes all the way back.
Yeah! You are almost there. The fact that the nail corrodes is indeed a fact. But the theory is why it does that. We can back that theory up with all kinds of facts, but in the end it is still the Basic Corrosion Theory.
The problem is where we evolved from. In the jungles skeletons do not last long. It takes a very special set of circumstances to keep fossils intact for more than 10,000 years, much less the 5 million years it would need to see these transitional bones. Bone diagenesis happens and then you will not find them. Then you have the fact that they would not have burried the dead, so animals would have eaten the bones. It is very difficult to find them because of this.
Here they are:
why do science change so much
If the method is so strict they should get it right the first time 
You clearly dont read what you put down as references and dont seem to know what your talking about because all your argument is, is just a bunch of links. People read the skim of things and take it as there knowledge, its what bad about the literature with modern science. Its like the old days bible that only the preists could read and understand. There are so many redundant sentences and overly complicated terms in evolution books that make it impossible for regular joes to read.
No one said science is a religion and if they did there stupid, evolution is the thing thats sometimes stated a religion because of a lot of believing is involved because of the amount of black holes there is in its theories.
It is like Klass nail analogy Fish. The evidence or 'facts' that these changes took place is already there. So even if evolution as it stands is not right, and the timelone is way off due to dating methods being found fraudulent in the future. The new theory would have to work in all the bone evidence, and dna mapping, on and on, to work the new method.
I agree, they do talk about science like it is a religion, I have seen people type 'your god science' a lot.
This one of weakest arguments i have yet seen. You just revealed macro evolutions biggest gap holeIs this not just the study of evolution that is micro and macro? You are getting pretty worked up over the timelines people study. It does not make it different processes. Macro is the study after the branch. So say you study human genetics and how we changed once we became modern humans. So how we moved from africa to today. Where Micro just continues to follow those changes all the way back.
The process is not changing, just when you chose to look at it.
Yeah! You are almost there. The fact that the nail corrodes is indeed a fact. But the theory is why it does that. We can back that theory up with all kinds of facts, but in the end it is still the Basic Corrosion Theory.
That is the same with evolution. The fact is that these changes take place. But the name of it that is using all the facts is the theory of evolution.
The problem is where we evolved from. In the jungles skeletons do not last long. It takes a very special set of circumstances to keep fossils intact for more than 10,000 years, much less the 5 million years it would need to see these transitional bones. Bone diagenesis happens and then you will not find them. Then you have the fact that they would not have burried the dead, so animals would have eaten the bones. It is very difficult to find them because of this.
Here they are:
CONGRATUALTIONS!
We only have a few thousand dinosaur skeletons. And those are of the largest land animals ever. And all of those come from things like oil pits that they wandered into.This one of weakest arguments i have yet seen. You just revealed macro evolutions biggest gap hole
No fossil proof, that picture also proves just a little they have on the whole topic.
HARD TO GET FOSSILS AT THAT AGE YOU SAY!?
dinosaur fossils are found so easly though?'
Did you know that when an animal eats another they leave the bones, the main ones anyway so no sorry they should have some. At least some that had died from a flood or mud slide or something that give us some preserved fossils. Every other animal in there time zone has them. (Burial site doesnt have to mean barried by another but just where they died).
im gona have to say you never have read the bible. Its very complex and has some pretty long words and awkward words in there, thats why if it is all a hoax has been so successful. It has some how covered many topics and events we see today and was written thousands of years ago.
stop putting those pics up, i think everyone has seen them. The missing links that connect us to chimpanzee is where theres so few, just that one spot oddly.