First New Yorker Arrested over new laws - decorated veteran 5 felonies for empty mags

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Irrelevant and misdirection.
lol.

so it's irrelevant that if romney won 300+ EC votes, it's a landslide, but when obama does win 330+ EC votes, it's not?

that's retarded, red. even for you.

obama won in yet another obama landlside. he won by an average of 159 EC votes each time. that's a margin of victory of nearly 30% of the EC votes each time.

landslide. the people have spoken.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
so the gun crowd you were referring to when you said "us" and "we" support marriage equality and reproductive rights for women? :lol: for all that anger, you seem to have forgotten what you said. "we", not "i".
Gays already have equal rights when it comes to marriage. They always have. Women already have reproductive rights. There is no law that restricts women from having as many children as they want. Mislabeling your agenda to make it appear to be something it isn't is an age old tactic of tyrants.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
lol. so it's irrelevant that if romney won 300+ EC votes, it's a landslide, but when obama does win 330+ EC votes, it's not? that's retarded, red. even for you. obama won in yet another obama landlside. he won by an average of 159 EC votes each time. that's a margin of victory of nearly 30% of the EC votes each time. landslide. the people have spoken.
Where did I say Romney had a landslide? Where did I even say Romney would even win? You want to pretend 51% is a landslide? Good luck with that. That's retarded, ShitPants, even for you.
 

Rancho Cucamonga

Active Member
not really, you guys want to impose your laws on women's bodies and gay's (non) marriages. among other little hypocrisies you guys foster.
Not me. One group I hate just as much or more then the gungrabbers would be the anti-abortion folks. But really both are two groups of people who believe their morals supersede our rights.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Gays already have equal rights when it comes to marriage.
says you. and michelle bachmann!*

retard.

saying that gays have equal marriage rights is like saying black slaves had freedom if they painted themselves white.

you're retarded.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Where did I say Romney had a landslide? Where did I even say Romney would even win? You want to pretend 51% is a landslide? Good luck with that. That's retarded, ShitPants, even for you.
300+ EC votes qualified as a landslide by romney's own camp.

so 330+ EC votes qualifies as a landslide, silly man.

two obama landslides.

the people have spoken.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
says you. and michelle bachmann!* retard. saying that gays have equal marriage rights is like saying black slaves had freedom if they painted themselves white. you're retarded.
Tell us exactly how the marriage laws treat gays differently, if you can. Your metaphors are really inappropriate. You really have a strong hatred for Michelle Bachmann, one of only two Congresspersons to not have been found to have been using their position to enrich themselves a the expense of the public. The other was Ron Paul, another one you hate. You seem to dislike honest politicians. What's up with that?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
300+ EC votes qualified as a landslide by romney's own camp. so 330+ EC votes qualifies as a landslide, silly man. two obama landslides. the people have spoken.
So instead of backing up your claim, you just repeat you're retarded statement? You haven't changed.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Tell us exactly how the marriage laws treat gays differently, if you can.
do tell me about the equality of benefits for partners of gay service members as opposed to partners of straight service members, stormfront red.

you fucking retard.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
"partners" aren't spouses. Can't even say "nice try".
then replace partners with spouses and tell me how spouses of gay service members have equality with spouses of straight service members, you fucking retard.

or are retarded and irrelevant misdirections all you have since you can't argue the point?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
then replace partners with spouses and tell me how spouses of gay service members have equality with spouses of straight service members, you fucking retard. or are retarded and irrelevant misdirections all you have since you can't argue the point?
Tell me about how they don't.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Tell me about how they don't.
so you're claiming that the spouses of gay service members get equal benefits as spouses of straight service members? are you saying equality exists there, stormfront red?

:lol:

can't answer that one, can ya?

:lol:

nice FAIL there.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
so you're claiming that the spouses of gay service members get equal benefits as spouses of straight service members? are you saying equality exists there, stormfront red? :lol: can't answer that one, can ya? :lol: nice FAIL there.
So you couldn't come up with an example of you're claimed inequality and that means I couldn't answer? :lol: nice FAIL there.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So you couldn't come up with an example of you're claimed inequality and that means I couldn't answer? :lol: nice FAIL there.
yes or no: do the spouses of gay service members get the same benefits as spouses of straight service members?

i'll give you a hint: the answer rhymes with 'joe'.

and to further elaborate, the same sex spouses are the ones who are denied benefits that straight couples receive.

sorry you're too pussy to admit basic facts!
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
You must have missed the thread with all of the stupid laws still on the books. We don't really repeal laws we just write new shiny ones and ignore the old ugly ones.

SCOTUS ruled in 2003 that sodomy laws were unconstitutional yet several states still have them on the books. Our constitution also was very specific that the 2nd shall not be infringed. They didn't say it's ok to infringe a little bit for the cheeeldren yet that's exactly what some states are doing.

I refuse to submit to tyrannical idiocy even if it's at the hands of the majority. I will maintain the blueprint of self-governing intended by this wonderful experiment. I promise to let you live your life the way you want and will do no harm if you let me live mine. And remember, we have all of the guns, you should probably leave us alone. That's all we want after all.
if they care enough about it then the first person to promise to repeal it would be voted in with little contest

yes old laws dont always go away but thats not proof against this
 
Top