First New Yorker Arrested over new laws - decorated veteran 5 felonies for empty mags

Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
you mean like colorado and washington?

again guns are not the same as cannabis

are you deliberately trying to be a poster child for those against cannabis?

Click to expand...
No, Im trying to point out you cant cherry pick laws just cos they suit your agenda.

If you're not American then let me guess, UK?

The UK has a gun ban similar to here, yet is the violent crime capital of Europe since it got more restrictive on gun ownership...care to discuss that?
 
S

str8sativa

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
cannabis doesnt kill anyone

the rifle that the magazine is an important component of is designed to kill people and the people of that state decided they wanted it banned

comparing the 2 is weak sauce argument that your trying to hard for it to fit
Click to expand...

the people of the ny didnt choose that you stupid fuck it was not voted on by the people it was inacted by the crooked politicians practically over night there was no vote
 
nontheist

nontheist

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
I'm not even trolling.

It's just the more I learn about Americans, the more I can see that the majority of yous are extremely proficient at talking out both sides of your mouths.

Guy fights (probably kills) to "defend the Constitution" and he gets arrested for a law that violates the 2nd and jerkoffs like you support it.

If it wasn't so nonsensical I'd be somewhat aroused by the irony.
Click to expand...
It doesn't go unnoticed liberal is pretty much a derogatory term here. They now try to use progressive but it's so humorous that no one can take it seriously.
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
str8sativa said:
the people of the ny didnt choose that you stupid fuck it was not voted on by the people it was inacted by the crooked politicians practically over night there was no vote
Click to expand...
yet the law has stayed there thru how many elections now?

if the people wanted it overturned it would have been a sure thing for any politician how promised to overturn it
 
S

str8sativa

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
yet the law has stayed there thru how many elections now?

if the people wanted it overturned it would have been a sure thing for any politician how promised to overturn it
Click to expand...

im not sure to be honest, it just rubs me the wrong way. the whole ny situation is pretty fucked becasue you are allowed to have pre ban 30 rounders
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
yet the law has stayed there thru how many elections now?

if the people wanted it overturned it would have been a sure thing for any politician how promised to overturn it
Click to expand...
Nixon started the Drug War, how many successive Governments have kept that retarded ball rolling?

The whole Federal intervention in MMJ states is also a complete contradiction to your point.
 
ginjawarrior

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
Nixon started the Drug War, how many successive Governments have kept that retarded ball rolling?

The whole Federal intervention in MMJ states is also a complete contradiction to your point.
Click to expand...
the people were fooled into thinking cannabis was dangerous by lies and they chose to ban it

how are they being fooled that guns are dangerous? you dont need lies for that one

seeing as how im not talking about mmj states or federal interevtion i fail to see your point about my supposed point
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
the people were fooled into thinking cannabis was dangerous by lies and they chose to ban it

how are they being fooled that guns are dangerous? you dont need lies for that one

seeing as how im not talking about mmj states or federal interevtion i fail to see your point about my supposed point
Click to expand...
You don't really seem capable of comprehending much at all...
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
won the majority of the popular vote...TWICE. no D has done that since FDR, silly. and yes a crushing 332-206 electoral college win (what counts!) is a landslide. but not as bad as the 365-173 shellacking he delivered mccain. now go cry in your cornflakes, the people have spoken.
Click to expand...
Really? When Bush won the electoral vote but lost the popular voter, you screamed bloody murder. Seems a bit of a double standard there, hypocrite.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Really? When Bush won the electoral vote but lost the popular voter, you screamed bloody murder.
Click to expand...
please point out one time where i complained about that.

by the way, even then bush only won the electoral college 271-267, stormfront red.

i recall many right wing pundits predicting a 300+ EC landlside for romney.

obama won in a landslide. twice.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
you mean like colorado and washington? again guns are not the same as cannabis are you deliberately trying to be a poster child for those against cannabis?
Click to expand...
Funny, they're still prosecuting people in Colorado and Washington. How is that?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
please point out one time where i complained about that. by the way, even then bush only won the electoral college 271-267, stormfront red. i recall many right wing pundits predicting a 300+ EC landlside for romney. obama won in a landslide. twice.
Click to expand...
If you want to pretend 51% is a landslide, go ahead. Don't be surprised if no one believes you tho....lol
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
ginjawarrior said:
yet the law has stayed there thru how many elections now?

if the people wanted it overturned it would have been a sure thing for any politician how promised to overturn it
Click to expand...
You must have missed the thread with all of the stupid laws still on the books. We don't really repeal laws we just write new shiny ones and ignore the old ugly ones.

SCOTUS ruled in 2003 that sodomy laws were unconstitutional yet several states still have them on the books. Our constitution also was very specific that the 2nd shall not be infringed. They didn't say it's ok to infringe a little bit for the cheeeldren yet that's exactly what some states are doing.

I refuse to submit to tyrannical idiocy even if it's at the hands of the majority. I will maintain the blueprint of self-governing intended by this wonderful experiment. I promise to let you live your life the way you want and will do no harm if you let me live mine. And remember, we have all of the guns, you should probably leave us alone. That's all we want after all.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
And remember, we have all of the guns, you should probably leave us alone. That's all we want after all.
Click to expand...
not really, you guys want to impose your laws on women's bodies and gay's (non) marriages. among other little hypocrisies you guys foster.
 
Rancho Cucamonga

Rancho Cucamonga

Active Member
Sadly, this is actually a good thing. Great honorable person to test the new laws with. I will be donating 25 to his legal fund.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
not really, you guys want to impose your laws on women's bodies and gay's (non) marriages. among other little hypocrisies you guys foster.
Click to expand...
Fuck you and your you guys. I don't care whose ass you stick your dick in. In fact, I don't care if your whole neighborhood marries each other. I am anti-abortion personally but pro-choice. And more than anything, I'm for individual freedom.

You can't make an argument without bashing someone by calling them gay (drips with irony when you do this, speaking of hypocrite), you treat all people in the south like it's 150 years ago and the 2% represent the entire population and when you've got nothing else you yell racist. You can be one of the most vile bigots on this site while doing this. Pathetic little man you can be sometimes. Your are full of shit most of your posts and when you are pressed on your shit you call names and start a new thread. Weak minded hack.

But hey, anyone who disagrees with your savior must be this boogeyman republican bible thumping racist mouth breather you saw on MSNBC in a clip a thousand times. That could be the only reason other people don't think like you do, there just couldn't be any other possibilities.

P.S.
Personal attacks on a forum are fun, I see why you do it now. Was gonna rant longer, then I got high.

P.P.S
You still make me laugh sometimes though, and grow some pretty plants so it's not a total loss:hug:
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
Fuck you and your you guys. I don't care whose ass you stick your dick in. In fact, I don't care if your whole neighborhood marries each other. I am anti-abortion personally but pro-choice. And more than anything, I'm for individual freedom.

You can't make an argument without bashing someone by calling them gay (drips with irony when you do this, speaking of hypocrite), you treat all people in the south like it's 150 years ago and the 2% represent the entire population and when you've got nothing else you yell racist. You can be one of the most vile bigots on this site while doing this. Pathetic little man you can be sometimes. Your are full of shit most of your posts and when you are pressed on your shit you call names and start a new thread. Weak minded hack.

But hey, anyone who disagrees with your savior must be this boogeyman republican bible thumping racist mouth breather you saw on MSNBC in a clip a thousand times. That could be the only reason other people don't think like you do, there just couldn't be any other possibilities.

P.S.
Personal attacks on a forum are fun, I see why you do it now. Was gonna rant longer, then I got high.
Click to expand...
so the gun crowd you were referring to when you said "us" and "we" support marriage equality and reproductive rights for women?

:lol:

for all that anger, you seem to have forgotten what you said. "we", not "i".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top