Results look good jack, but what makes you conclude it's thanks to defoliation and not despite? What "exactly" do you mean by it works?
Revegged monstercrop sativa dom, no defoliation till a couple of days before harvest (verifiable in my pic journal...) :
View attachment 3249284
Indica dom, no defoliation till about 5 days before harvest (humidity being a bitch in the summer), one of the leafiest plants I've grown. Long petioles too.
View attachment 3249285
In the canopy control thread there's a grow from me with a ridiculous way too full packed 3x4 closet in which I got barely a gram of popcorn.
It should now be obvious why posting a picture means so little. There are plenty of examples of pictures of non-defoliated plants with rock hard nuggets at the bottom so according to your own (and fellow-defoliators' ) logic there's no point. I posted many more examples in other threads in response to such misleading examples, including one of a plant that was grown half under the canopy of another plant (in canopy control and supercropping thread).
What many croppers and scroggers don't get is that you try to get a similar situation as a SoG (highest yielding grow style used for decades to supply to dutch coffeeshops (google 'hennepkwekerij' and see images result). It's not about getting the highest number of buds sites. See my post here which includes a drawing to make it more clear:
http://rollitup.org/t/grams-per-watt-in-peat-moss.842640/#post-10845488