Here it comes - gun control!!!

T

TreeOfLiberty

Well-Known Member
An aggressive gun ban bill could happen now. Future sales of semi-auto rifles could come, and semi-auto handguns could either be banned or limited in mag capacity. Semi-auto shotguns could be banned. Some really aggressive gun bans could happen. Banning the sales on a list of many types of guns is probably at least is what is coming. "Ownership" of the millions of guns already in possession of many U.S. citizens is a whole other matter.

Any attempt at gun confiscation will likely trigger violent physical resistance. The Feds will start a major civil war if a ban comes ordering law enforcement to go round up all of the hundreds of thousands of AR15s and AK47s. If that happens, law enforcement will become cannon fodder, then the Feds will probably ask the help of UN soldiers as most of the US military is in the MidEast. If it goes that far, martial law will be declared. By that time, many businesses will have closed down, food shortages , and gun battles against the soldiers will be a day to day occurrence in the U.S.

If gun confiscations are attempted, the U.S. will never be the same in a matter of weeks following attempts at gun round ups. The U.S. will end up in a worse state that Mexico is if gun round ups are tried. At minimum, I believe sales of many semi-auto firearms is coming.If there is no grandfather clause at those already in the hands of citizens and they are expected to turn them in, it's not going to happen.
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
TreeOfLiberty said:
An aggressive gun ban bill could happen now. Future sales of semi-auto rifles could come, and semi-auto handguns could either be banned or limited in mag capacity. Semi-auto shotguns could be banned. Some really aggressive gun bans could happen. Banning the sales on a list of many types of guns is probably at least is what is coming. "Ownership" of the millions of guns already in possession of many U.S. citizens is a whole other matter.

Any attempt at gun confiscation will likely trigger violent physical resistance. The Feds will start a major civil war if a ban comes ordering law enforcement to go round up all of the hundreds of thousands of AR15s and AK47s. If that happens, law enforcement will become cannon fodder, then the Feds will probably ask the help of UN soldiers as most of the US military is in the MidEast. If it goes that far, martial law will be declared. By that time, many businesses will have closed down, food shortages , and gun battles against the soldiers will be a day to day occurrence in the U.S.

If gun confiscations are attempted, the U.S. will never be the same in a matter of weeks following attempts at gun round ups. The U.S. will end up in a worse state that Mexico is if gun round ups are tried. At minimum, I believe sales of many semi-auto firearms is coming.If there is no grandfather clause at those already in the hands of citizens and they are expected to turn them in, it's not going to happen.
Click to expand...
While i agree the UN would be called in to help enforce said expected bans, i think they might need some help.
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
i have heard, from 3 independent sources, that the UN has troops practicing home to home searches on the old barracks at Lemoore Naval Air Station.
 
DelSlow

DelSlow

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
what registration laws? There are none.
Click to expand...
Every state is different. Where I'm at (HI) you have to take your guns(s) to the police station after you buy them. They take pictures of the gun, serial number, etc. and they already have all of your personal info. There is a two week waiting period on handguns, and you have to apply for a permit for every handgun you buy. Magazines are restricted to 10 rounds. You also have to pass a safety course in order to buy a gun.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Drunkard said:
Adam Lanza was a quiet person
John Holmes was a quiet person

Both considered intelligent, both were anti social, both have no criminal background, both nobody thought they could do this. It builds up slowly and quietly without people realizing it.

Not sure about the others, in 2007 and below I wasn't a very news watching person as I am now.
Click to expand...
adam lanza shot his momma in the head before heading out ion his date with destiny... so yeah, super stable.

he is being painted as a victim, as a ploy to show guns are the problem, not shy bookish teenagers who live with their mothers at 20 despite "being described as a genius". the lefties cannot argue that the guns are the problem if, like klebold and harris, cinnanan, cho, that hmong douchebag in new york or all the rest of the spree shooters, the problem is obviously unstable frootloops. unstable frootloops snap and go bonkers with whatever weapon comes to hand, fom bricks, to baseball bats, to ninja swords bought at the mall (lol)

making the killer appear to be a victim is a part of the plan, the gun must be blamed, rather than the user. news stories arent fact, they are made of more opinion than substance, especially when blaming a gun suits the writer's purpose better than blaming the perpetrator.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
adam lanza shot his momma in the head before heading out ion his date with destiny... so yeah, super stable.

he is being painted as a victim, as a ploy to show guns are the problem, not shy bookish teenagers who live with their mothers at 20 despite "being described as a genius". the lefties cannot argue that the guns are the problem if, like klebold and harris, cinnanan, cho, that hmong douchebag in new york or all the rest of the spree shooters, the problem is obviously unstable frootloops. unstable frootloops snap and go bonkers with whatever weapon comes to hand, fom bricks, to baseball bats, to ninja swords bought at the mall (lol)

making the killer appear to be a victim is a part of the plan, the gun must be blamed, rather than the user. news stories arent fact, they are made of more opinion than substance, especially when blaming a gun suits the writer's purpose better than blaming the perpetrator.
Click to expand...
how many people would loughner have taken out had the brady bill been renewed?

and is it really and truly freedom unless my magazine is of sufficient capacity to wipe out a room full of kindergarteners without reloading?

have your guns, but design them for the purposes that you say they are for: self defense and hunting.

we don't need guns that are made for the battle of the bulge, that's simply retarded.

i am happy to allow you paranoid fruitcakes your penis enhancers all day long (edit: i kind of have to, there's something in the constitution about it) as long as you guys can show me you're keeping them safe. that wasn't the case in my state the other day, and that wasn't this case with the momma who was killed with her own gun that she failed to lock away safely while not in use.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
what registration laws? There are none.
Click to expand...
ha check out this guy!

he thinks those ATF forms you gotta fill out to buy a gun arent registration.. ahh you slay me.

any time you buy a gun the ATF gets a form with your name, the guns serial number, and all the data they need to enter you details into the gun registration database that they "Totally Dont Keep Since That Would Be A Violation Of Court Rulings And The Law!""
gotta make sure you speak clearly, and loudly for the microphones. it's all about deniability.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
how many people would loughner have taken out had the brady bill been renewed?

and is it really and truly freedom unless my magazine is of sufficient capacity to wipe out a room full of kindergarteners without reloading?

have your guns, but design them for the purposes that you say they are for: self defense and hunting.

we don't need guns that are made for the battle of the bulge, that's simply retarded.

i am happy to allow you paranoid fruitcakes your penis enhancers all day long (edit: i kind of have to, there's something in the constitution about it) as long as you guys can show me you're keeping them safe. that wasn't the case in my state the other day, and that wasn't this case with the momma who was killed with her own gun that she failed to lock away safely while not in use.
Click to expand...
more blather. as perviously stated, by tench Coxe, All the weapons of war. not some, not part, not those which can be justified by moralizing douchebags, but ALL. thats our right, and for good reasons. any infringement on those rights would be considered cause foir revolution if it were rights you are not conditioned to despise.

suppose Dubya made some executive orders, to protect the public of course, which prohibitted newspapers and tv networks from engaging in undercover hidden camera reporting, or prohibited defaming or criticizing politicians, like you find in the laws of so much of the world? you would be shouting for revolution, but with what guns buck? what guns?

how about if the pentagon decides they've had enough of this jumped up leftist in the whitehouse and decide to throw a coup d'etat? would you still argue our new Junta's leaders are right to ban various guns you currently see no value in?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
more blather. as perviously stated, by tench Coxe, All the weapons of war. not some, not part, not those which can be justified by moralizing douchebags, but ALL. thats our right, and for good reasons. any infringement on those rights would be considered cause foir revolution if it were rights you are not conditioned to despise.

suppose Dubya made some executive orders, to protect the public of course, which prohibitted newspapers and tv networks from engaging in undercover hidden camera reporting, or prohibited defaming or criticizing politicians, like you find in the laws of so much of the world? you would be shouting for revolution, but with what guns buck? what guns?

how about if the pentagon decides they've had enough of this jumped up leftist in the whitehouse and decide to throw a coup d'etat? would you still argue our new Junta's leaders are right to ban various guns you currently see no value in?
Click to expand...
with what guns? you guys are the ones constantly mouth farting about how gun bans don't work.

did you miss the part about the militia being well-regulated?

call me when england is invading and trying to install a monarch on us.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
who here is part of a militia?
Click to expand...
every free man between 16 and 60. thats who. it's the law.

it's also the basis for the draft, and the "organized militia" which would otherwise be called the "army" if standing armies were not prohibited by the constitution.

your weak little fictions are not helping your case.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
every free man between 16 and 60. thats who. it's the law.

it's also the basis for the draft, and the "organized militia" which would otherwise be called the "army" if standing armies were not prohibited by the constitution.

your weak little fictions are not helping your case.
Click to expand...
shouldn't i get some kind of cool badge for being a member of this militia you say i belong to?

where's my uniform?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top