born2killspam
Well-Known Member
Your scientific method sucks.. why add the male variable to this experiment?? You'll just end up with mystery seeds.. Since the male would be contributing males and females, you wouldn't even be able to use apparent feminization to know whether your silver application worked..Hey Mates ~ Been spraying my Ladies every other day for 6 days now with CS water. I run the CS for 24 hours, the color is light copper in hue. I'll continue for another week spraying every other day. I've read that many plants look poorly after spraying, mine however look great. Hummmm? I really soak them too.
Another question for someone: Say i have a female that is positioned next to a pollinating male, she's getting laid for sure! I'm spraying her too, what can I expect by way of seeds? Will some be fems, while others are regs? In un-chartered waters here.
Is a 14 day run spraying going to do it? The ladies were just beginning to flower when i began. My bad.
And sadly I think that is highly questionable.. IIRC you're using a product 50-100x weaker than successful experiments (real experiments on non-cannabis plants) I've read.. Those experiments also report the appearance of stress, unlike your observations..
BTW Fletch (and others) I came across some data that says ionic silver solutions increase in conductivity (EC) by 1.6µSiemens/cm*ppm as compared to 2.0µSiemens/cm*ppm that our meters are calibrated for..
This means that a 1000ppm ionic silver solution would read 800ppm or 1.6EC on the meter..
(Basically multiply the ppm on the readout by 1.25)