I Need to be Comforted. Is America this Bad?

natrone23

Well-Known Member
Every reference he made to 'ending the war on drugs' during his campaign he SPECIFICALLY mentions 'federal mandatory minimums for crack.' Not weed, not coke, not meth, CRACK!!

Then it hit me, it's about race, specifically HIS race. (If you weren't paying attention kids, the higher percentage of Crack arrests are 'African American' and the sentences handed out are ridiculously high. I agree with lowering them or removing them, but NOT releasing them.)

I don't have a problem with any race at all, what I do have a problem with is legislation having a racial preference. If he decides to let crack dealers and crack heads off the hook he sure as hell better let weed growers off the hook as well. I personally loath crack, I watched it kill several of my friends and I'll never touch the stuff or associate with anyone who does.



:finger: Obama

-RT76
The problem with the crack laws is they DO have a racial preference. Crack cocaine gets you more time in prison than powdered cocaine........why is there different sentencing guidelines? for the same drug? I'll tell you why, crack is used and mostly sold by black people while on the other hand powder is mostly used by rich white kids.

what I do have a problem with is legislation having a racial preference
then you should agree with obama in repealing these ridiculous sentancing guidlines for crack. The reason sentanceing is so harsh is because racial preference was used when deciding the the sentacing guidlines for crack cocaine and powdered coke in the first place.

the higher percentage of Crack arrests are 'African American' and the sentences handed out are ridiculously high. I agree with lowering them or removing them
So you agree with Obama again:clap:
 

bicycle racer

Well-Known Member
also the sentence for an ounce of coke is less than for an ounce of crack even though an ounce of blow makes alot more than an ounce of crack as crack is cut with sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) to make it easily smokeable.
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
possesion w. intednt to distribute o f 5 grams of crack can get you 5 years. It would take over a lb. of powdered coke to get you 5 years.
 

puffpuffPASSEDOUT

Well-Known Member
I dont think its unfair... Lets look at what crack does versus coke:

CRACKHEAD:




COKEHEAD:



Get my drift? lol ..But seriously crack is right there next to meth. Its so strong that it can basically stop your heart. ..Fuck that shit.
 

bicycle racer

Well-Known Member
its the same substance thats like saying i only eat pot those pot smokers are crazy. im my younger years i have snorted and smoked coke no difference you can fuck up your life either way. by the way i do not like blow its bullshit it makes stupid people think there smart and smart people stupid.
 

puffpuffPASSEDOUT

Well-Known Member
Crack is pure cocaine... Street coke is what 70%?

Thats why its worse.

its like morphine (pure heroin) vs street heroin. Same drug just more potent/more dangerous
 

bicycle racer

Well-Known Member
your absolutely incorrect crack is cut with sodium bicarbonate 1 ounce of pure cocaine makes alot more than an ounce of crack if youve ever smoked coke pure you would know it melts and is hard to smoke. that is why crack is cut to make it easier to smoke. the only difference between smoking and shooting is that smoking hits the brain faster crack is less pure than cocaine. peace
 

The Producer

Active Member
So how about we all agree crack and cocaine are just dirty, silly drugs? Haha. Thanks for the response RetiredToker. You definitely seem to have obtained wisdom through your years. But you also reminded me of something that kind of excites and worries me. You mentioned about Obama's terms and I have no doubt in my mind he will make his second term from how many have taken him as the messiah. But anyway... If and when he takes on his second term, do you think he will feel he has nothing to lose and that being the ideal time to legalize pot? Or do you think he will have the same feelings but make things work to go out with as much government revenue as possible? Like I said, those are just ideas that have me a little concerned.
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
yes, because legalization is at the forefront of of obama's agenda :roll: Obama does not care about the legalization of weed bro. And if he gets a second term there is no hope for the american people
 

RetiredToker76

Well-Known Member
The problem with the crack laws is they DO have a racial preference. Crack cocaine gets you more time in prison than powdered cocaine........why is there different sentencing guidelines? for the same drug? I'll tell you why, crack is used and mostly sold by black people while on the other hand powder is mostly used by rich white kids.

then you should agree with obama in repealing these ridiculous sentancing guidlines for crack. The reason sentanceing is so harsh is because racial preference was used when deciding the the sentacing guidlines for crack cocaine and powdered coke in the first place.

So you agree with Obama again:clap:
You misquoted me.. Yes I agree with removing and/or lowering the mandatory minimums on crack. I DO NOT agree with releasing those convicted of crack related offenses. (With the possible and extrememly rare 'non-violent crack offender' (I can only think of one and that was when George Clinton got busted for crack while sitting in his car in Tallahassee.)

IF ... and I say IF he removes or reduces the punishment for crack related offenses and DOES NOT touch the marijuana laws then HE is legislating racially.)

Since you address it, and several others do ... CRACK IS NOT COCAINE.

I've had plenty of acquaintances use coke regularly or occasionally. While I didn't like most of them while they were strung out, on the whole they weren't NEARLY as bad as the people I knew hooked on crack. Most the coke heads I knew got off the powder (one had a stroke the other four entered rehab and are still clean) the three crack heads I knew died (1 murdered and 2 died of OD's on crack.) Granted my sample is small but coke had a 25% fatality rate and crack had a 100% fatality rate in my small circle. Oh ya, only one black guy out of the group and he prefered the powder and is still alive.)

Yes cocaine mixed with baking soda is crack, but that's not all that happens. It's mixed with water and made into a paste, then it is cooked. After it's cooked it's removed and 'dropped' to make it crack into rocks (get the feeling I've done this before?)

The heating aspect of the process changes the chemicals on a molecular level. The water not only allows the spreading of the paste, but also creates a 'microwave' effect through the heated evaporation. (Water molecules create their own heat as they evaporate or a microwave wouldn't do anything.) The result is a created chemical that is not indentically molecular to cocaine, it' a different drug all together.

Yes both are HARSH drugs and do some pretty nasty things to people, but hell I've seen pot heads that were once brilliant fall to perpetual couch lock. However marijuana is dried and cured and we all know the best weed is unaltered weed.

I've smoked Coke (sprinkled on REALLY bad schwag) that doesn't mean I smoked crack. You could 'smoke' cocaine long before crack, freebasing (anyone remember Richard Pryor?) I didn't get hooked on Coke those few times I smoked it, but I've never seen anyone walk away cold from crack.

Crack is not equal to Cocaine. Saying that it is, is like saying a birthday cake is just an egg with flower and water to make it doughy.

After his disdain displayed at the thought of legalizing marijuana, a prety much racially equal drug and his ferver in his speaches about not only removing sentencaing guidelines on crack but also releasing crack offenders, I get the strong feeling that he is going to be racially biased in his legislation. Specifically that he will ignore or take less interest in things that do not directly effect blacks. He has a 'bag' of promises to keep up first but I fear that once he's either proven his inability to keep them or he succeeds that he will focus on specifically racially tilted issues and legislate rasism towards (or at least in the general direction of) whites.

He spoke out against 'southerners' saying they 'clung to their religion and guns.' Well isn't that just pretty Mr congregation of Rev. White an admitted racist. The people in that church were in a ferver against 'da man' and obviously hated 'whitey.' I don't think a near lifetime of that preeching had ANY effect on Pres. Obama. :wall:

I think Dr. King had the right idea of 'equality.' He included whites in his ideology and being together. If Mr Obama thinks this way congratulations. I'll gladly see both Marijuana and Crack laws go away, but if only one goes.. Well you do the math, who's governmentally discriminated against now?

Right now I see 'strategic pandering' to the corporations and banks. I see an unwillingness to understand what the people care about. (His internet town hall meeting, if he'd explored the idea at ALL he would have had a better argument.) I see his staff exploring all kinds of firearms legislation despite Nacny Pelosi's statement against the idea. The ONE thing I agree with was his defunding of Guantanemo Bay. While I agree we need to get Osama bin Laden, I don't see any of the promised exit from Iraq, but I see more kids going to Afganistan when MOST of the terrists are known to be in Pakistan. He already renigged on his campaign call to abolish 'Faith Based initatives' and in fact INCREASED the funding for them. What I'm not seeing is a whole lot of change and I'm really not getting a good feeling of Hope either.

The Obamessiah ferver bugs the hell out of me because it shows a complete lack of free thought and an over abundance of group mentality. I only hope that there are those who have the testicular stregnth to stand up against any tilted legislation he gets introduced and that things at a minimum remain at or near status quo. If change starts leaning in a bad direction there will be a new term that typically only applies to people seeking legal prosectution for capital crimes.

"United States refugee."

I use a term my grand-dad used. "Post Turtle."

A post turtle is a turtle you see atop a fencepost. You are vexed by this prospect. First you realize that a turtle can't do much atop a fence post. Then you become perplexed as to how exactly it got up there. Since it can't do much in that position and it had no chance of getting there on its own, you then question, "Who exactly was the moron that put it up there."

If Obama gets a second term then I truely wonder what will happen. It could be the worse Presidential coups that's happened since Watergate, or it could be the restoration of Camelot. In other words I don't know if he'll legislate the relesal of marijuana or not, I also don't know that he won't be legislating in favor of his theocratic upbringing.

It's only been two months and there might be magic up those sleeves. His words are pretty, I'll give you that. He's got charisma and charecter. What I have yet to see are actions. I don't believe in charisma, charecter, or words until I see them backed up with action. What I'm seeing instead is more wheeling and dealing typical of anyone in office.

-RT76
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
crack and cocaine are the same drug. Crack is just the freebase form of the drug, still the exact same drug.Obviously smoking a drug is more addictive due to the faster route of administration, but guess what, you can slam cocaineHCl...
 

hom36rown

Well-Known Member
it is the exact same drug in freebase formwhich is done through achemical transformation same drug, same exact effects in the brain
 

RetiredToker76

Well-Known Member
Crack vaporizes near temperature 90 °C (194 °F),[1] much lower than the cocaine hydrochloride melting point of 190 °C (374 °F).[1] Whereas cocaine hydrochloride cannot be smoked (burns with no effect),[1] crack cocaine when smoked allows for quick absorption into the blood stream, and reaches the brain in 8 seconds.[1] Coupled with the fact that crack is considered more potent than cocaine hydrochloride, users obtain an intense high much more quickly than with the normal method of insufflating ("sniffing" or "snorting") the powdered cocaine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crack_cocaine

Cocaine hydrochloride is readily converted to base prior to use. The physiological and psychoactive effects of cocaine are similar regardless of whether it is in the form of cocaine hydrochloride or crack cocaine (cocaine base). However, evidence exists showing a greater abuse liability, greater propensity for dependence, and more severe consequences when cocaine is smoked (cocaine-base) or injected intravenously (cocaine hydrochloride) compared with intranasal use (cocaine hydrochloride). The crucial variables appear to be the immediacy, duration, and magnitude of cocaine's effect, as well as the frequency and amount of cocaine used rather than the form of the cocaine.
[SIZE=-1]
[/SIZE]
http://www.cocaine.org/crack/index.html
 

The Producer

Active Member
yes, because legalization is at the forefront of of obama's agenda :roll: Obama does not care about the legalization of weed bro. And if he gets a second term there is no hope for the american people
I just don't understand!!! What do politicians have against marijuana? I realize the government has a readily increasing and extremely large drug war budget handed to them on a silver platter but by legalizing, taxing, and regulating they would make so much more! I just don't understand! Is it the fact politicians are heavily funded by the tobacco, alcohol, and pharmaceutical industries to keep marijuana illegal? I know we can nor will ever know for sure but I would just like to hear a reasonable theory as to why. So... Please everyone. Give me your best ideas.
 
Top