Gary Goodson
Well-Known Member
smhOn a flat stationary earth the bullet would be going 1750 miles per hour.
smhOn a flat stationary earth the bullet would be going 1750 miles per hour.
You ... unspeakable Philistine. You killed this.
![]()
On a flat stationary earth the bullet would be going 1750 miles per hour.
Could be, but I'd much rather play with a normally-aspirated V12 than the small V8 they turboed to a fare-thee-well in the '40.The F40 was a better, purer car. Especially the early ones.
Explain why it would be different on a round, rotating one.
After awhile you just leave them to drool on their wooden blocks while you go build something useful.
You ... unspeakable Philistine. You killed this.
![]()
Nice CGI, see how lazy NASA is they dont even bother doing a decent job of cutting and pasting the clouds on. Ask yourself why are they lying to us?View attachment 3698405 View attachment 3698405
This thread I must say is number 1 , nothing like a bunch of stoners talking physics. I choose to take the blue pill..
Could be, but I'd much rather play with a normally-aspirated V12 than the small V8 they turboed to a fare-thee-well in the '40.
Now me, I want the 599GTB "Fiorano" ...![]()
On a rotating earth the bullet going west would be 1000mph the earths speed o f rotation plus 1700 plus the 50 the truck is doing
2750 miles an hour. Because the earth is supposedly moving at 1000 mph, we don't see that.