Kerry Says "The Bible" is why we must save the Muslims from Global Warming/Climate Change
- Thread starter Sand4x105
- Start date
Are you sure he isn't just an anthropogenic denier? I know I am, I firmly believe that the climate is changing, but do not blame humans for the effect.
If all of humanity were removed from the earth, do you still think it is possible for the climate to change? Or would the worlds climate never change?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Actually, this is quite true. Buck didn't like how I was mocking him about the "Thomas Jefferson face of a rapist thread" and went whining to the mods to delete my posts about muslims raping rapaciously in their realms.
It back fired on him when the mod deleted the whole damn thread. LULZ
Sounds like he needs a new sig line falsely accusing people of doing exactly what he's doing.
Better get in here and deflect buck.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
All of the models work? They all agree? That is wierd.... Why would there be multiple models if they all agree?? Oh wait, this is a religion, not science!! Lets not acknowledge the leader of the movement sold his failed TV station to a terrorist organization backed by oil money. He is such a model citizen.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
Dude isn't even awake yet, its 1 PM
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Global warming has taken a 16 years long hiatus. Just as the models predicted!
LULZ
LULZ
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Surrounded by vomit, empty liquor bottles and disappointment.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I think within 20 years we'll have a better handle. Historical records show CO2 and temps increase or decrease. The argument is that CO2 increases temps, the against argument is that temps increase CO2.
We had historical temps increase in the 90's, the last 10 years have shown a 20% increase in CO2. If the next 20 years reflect the increase in CO2 by being the hottest yet, it will prove temps follow CO2. If not, then it will show that the CO2 increase followed the temp increase in the 90's.
Despite what some will tell us, the science is not settled until this very important aspect can be predicted. We have made great strides in climatology, but until these models produce better predictions than the farmer's almanac, we can't take it as gospel as some do. The IPCC is only trustworthy if they are your God.
Yes, I believe we are shitting in our kitchen, but I have no idea the damage and certainly can't predict the future.
I planted 12 Bradford Pears this year down my driveway, still waiting for my medal for saving the world. Seriously though, plant a tree!
desert dude
Well-Known Member
I would have planted peach trees, but pears are good too.
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Even if we could prove either theory there is no evidence that at other points in earths history the values could contradict the current model.
Which is why this argument is so silly. We have less than 100 years of solid weather data and most of it is biased by local testing methods.
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
Somebody needs lovies! Bring it in, baby. I'll smother that hateful shit with my delicious hugs.
*BigBigBear hugs*
desert dude
Well-Known Member
I fart for the warmth!
Pinworm
Well-Known Member
MOOO! Your methane is destroying the environments!I fart for the warmth!
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Yes, the climate changes naturally over thousands of years, greenhouse gas ppm have risen dramatically since the industrial revolution, 2012-2013 saw the highest concentration increase since records began in 1984, and 2000-2010 was the hottest decade on record, so regardless of what NLXSK1 believes about there being some stable gap in the increase in temperatures, it's simply a lie and he's been told dozens and dozens of times and he still spouts the bullshit. That's why he is a denier. He knows what the truth is, yet denies it. The anthropogenic factor has caused global temps to increase at a rate that will significantly change the planet in hundreds of years.
Do you understand the difference?
ACC was a well established science when your senile ass was in diapers, sport. Al Gore, as much as you want him to be, is not some stand alone hero in the ACC community, he's a career politician. That's probably why you don't understand a single goddamn thing about real science or how it works, because you don't listen to real scientists.
Hmm, imagine that!
According to 34 national science academies and 97% of the scientific community who study it, it is.
Creationists say the same thing about the theory of evolution, then when exactly what they complain about is found, they move the goalposts and ask for more evidence, exactly like you would do 10-20 years from now when everything being predicted now comes true.
"We just don't have enough evidence" is a bullshit scapegoat way for you to get out of taking any responsibility
If you don't accept it right now, no amount of evidence that could ever be produced will convince you, that's how denial works.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
If you were paying attention and had half a brain, you would know that my son is 8. I compared you to a 5 year old with Downs.Not as smart as someone who can come up with "pig fucker"... Sounds like your 5 year old helped you with that one - proving the apple doesn't fall far from the tree...
he's a big boy for 5... I'm guessing a c-section?
We all know why you got confused...go away Pig Fucker.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
While your holding him, I'll kick him in the puss.
ginwilly
Well-Known Member
I've actually taken responsibility, I planted trees
So show off a bit here, tell us what part of the science other than man is doing bad shit is settled?
Does CO2 follow temps or do temps follow CO2?
Are we in a natural cooling cycle or warming cycle?
How much difference would cutting 15% of carbon output make?
How much of the GW is caused by deforestation?
How much difference has ethanol made?
What will happen 10 years from now without change?20? 100?
Similar threads
