wheels619
Well-Known Member
thats becuz u have never used one.All i am trying to say is a light mover dosent replace a light. it is a tool to help to get light to all sides of the buds.
thats becuz u have never used one.All i am trying to say is a light mover dosent replace a light. it is a tool to help to get light to all sides of the buds.
I have 3 light movers. I USE THEM TO MOVE THE LIGHTS less than 12"s I used to use a light swing, where it would just swing the light. I tryed to spead the light out before 6 foot light rail, the plants that were under a light 100% of the time got huge rock hard buds. and the plants that got less light didn't get as big of buds. so I added more lights now everything has big buds.thats becuz u have never used one.
Ya, I understand that point on light movers but I believe that it is not just plants all getting some light.. I believe the more light each plants get the higher the yield.
Yield=# of lights... NOT number of plants.
So for that reason I do not need a mover so that I can use less lights. If I got a mover, I would still use 3 1000w and justget more penetration but just as many lumens.
I agree completely.All i am trying to say is a light mover dosent replace a light. it is a tool to help to get light to all sides of the buds.
10 plants no. but 6-8 decent sized plants in my 4x8 with the single 1000 is doing ballin with the single light. a 1000 watt light has 5 ft of light penetration. so if i go 2 ft right and 2 ft left from center at a fast enough pace with a single 1000 on a rail gives me great results. everything still gets light and grows fabulously. i have no issues. if i was growing to support myself then no ur right i would probably go with a 1000 per meter sq. but when its just me aiming for about a P off of 4 plants for me and my friends to smoke like i am now i have no problems with it. my yields are great and my power bill is half what it normally is. i dont have to sell as much of the weed i grow to pay for power and supplies. which in turn means more smoke for me and my compadres. rails arent for comercial use. i never said they were. but for a cost efficient point of view they cant be beat. the loss in yield makes up for it in power saving alone. even with a rail i get 1.75 times as much bud as when my single thousand light is stationary. i absolutely love my rail. ive filled the whole 4x8 space with no issues of light penetration and shit like that.I agree completely.
Though of course it does not make sense to have only 1 small plant under a 1000w light. That would be too many lumens lost. Neither does it make sense to have 10 big plants under 1 1000w light on a light mover- sure, the plants get light all around but they do not get as much as they need to reach full potential.
Its all about finding a middle ground.
I agree that a light rail is a good idea for a ton of reasons.. But not so that you can use less lights.. Plants absorb a certain amount of light. If you have lets say 10 plants under 2 1000w stationary lights then they will grow damn well but some areas will not grow as much because they did not get light.
If you place the same 10 plants under 1 1000w on a light mover then more areas of the plant will grow.. BUT you will decrease over all yield 100%.
where do you get your yield numbers from? both me AND a fellow grower (not even counting people i have talked to online) have experienced no to little yield loss with light rails and less light.I agree completely.
Though of course it does not make sense to have only 1 small plant under a 1000w light. That would be too many lumens lost. Neither does it make sense to have 10 big plants under 1 1000w light on a light mover- sure, the plants get light all around but they do not get as much as they need to reach full potential.
Its all about finding a middle ground.
I agree that a light rail is a good idea for a ton of reasons.. But not so that you can use less lights.. Plants absorb a certain amount of light. If you have lets say 10 plants under 2 1000w stationary lights then they will grow damn well but some areas will not grow as much because they did not get light.
If you place the same 10 plants under 1 1000w on a light mover then more areas of the plant will grow.. BUT you will decrease over all yield 100%.
some peeps just dont understand. lol. rails are nice. altho i wouldnt run it in flower with anything less than a thousand. i even vegged with it with a 400 and had amazing even growth.where do you get your yield numbers from? both me AND a fellow grower (not even counting people i have talked to online) have experienced no to little yield loss with light rails and less light.
i didnt replace as much light as him, but he went from 3k to 1k on a rail and lost 4 grams.
"OH MY FUCKING GOD, 4 GRAMS??!?! I CANT SACRIFICE 4 GRAMS"
I have the LIGHTRAIL 3.5 and love it.thay are shit unless you buy top of line
iit cost me 108.33 per 1000 watt light per month just 12/12. no vegging. thats not including cooling and fans. i have roughly 3200 watts available to use but i always end up having a couple of hps lights with about a week or 2 of downtime while i harvest so i save a bit on my bill each month.Wow it's hard to imagine living somewhere that electricity costs that much. I live in the midwestern us and 3000w @ 12hrs a day will increase my bill only 90 dollars a month. And even when i calculate for ballast effecientcy and cooling as you described my monthly flowering cost would only increase by 138 dollars per month.
Someone gave me a couple of chain driven rails... I don't need them but ive never used one so i wanted to try them out..
I set one up but the chain keeps falling off after a several hours of use.
Anyone know what's causing it, or know anything I can do?
Thanks in advance for any insight.