It is not certain. Not even close to certain. Infection rates are unknown and you're going to have to wait for the NIH seroprevalence study to come out to prove this unequivocally but it is demonstrable in several seroprevalence studies which have already been conducted that this is the case. However, I would tend to agree that lockdowns have had a very slight positive effect on the reproductive rate, as I have all along.
No, the figure you have repeatedly posted has nothing to do with the reproductive rate. Any inference that can be made in regard to the reproductive rate based on it is completely unscientific.
You keep declaring this, but it's simply fasle, as I have repeatedly demonstrated. They don't even have a final death count.
"Look how many deaths have been counted, the R0 is down" is what you're literally saying and it is quite retarded.