londonfog
Well-Known Member
It would just help if you stick with the facts. It was an SUV not a carHave you seen the cop? He is a skinny white boy!!!
New Evidence in Michael Brown Case
- Thread starter NLXSK1
- Start date
londonfog
Well-Known Member
so now Darren was not shooting at Brown as he was running away ?
Last edited:
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
Stupid fuk, how is that segregation?!? When you have a community that is 80% black, the police force should not be 95% white, THAT is segregation. If racist assholes weren't in charge of the hiring, the police force would have ratios that reflect more of the demographic of the community. I wonder what the uproar from the white community would be like if a 98% white community was policed by a 99% black police force and white teenagers kept dying in the community by the hands of the police? Maybe there wouldn't be any uproar, maybe they would see the killing of unarmed teenagers as just part of the job?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Id link the video but your butthurt is better.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Running away? Where are the entry wounds in the back?
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Maybe crakas just like being pigs moar?
I'll even do it in an equation for you
Everything =/= racism
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
I am not sure. There were 2 shots in the car and 4 more shots in Michael Brown. How many shots were fired?
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
So you want the government to treat people differently based on the color of their skin? Didnt we just spend 200 years getting away from that? You gotta make up your mind man, you are making me dizzy!!
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
londonfog
Well-Known Member
So you too believe he was not running away. Then do tell how the fuck Brown got away from the police vehicle. Did he magically transport 30 feet away ?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
Well so far the narrative from the witnesses is falling apart.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
you are not sure Brown was running away ?
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
all shots were at close range
londonfog
Well-Known Member
only to those who choose to believe the cop
londonfog
Well-Known Member
not all . You probably need to do some more research.
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Don't waste you time. We both know you really believed Obama started the free phone program.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
ST. LOUIS COUNTY • The official autopsy on Michael Brown shows that he was shot in the hand at close range, according to an analysis of the findings by two experts not involved directly in the case.
The accompanying toxicology report shows he had been using marijuana.
Those documents, prepared by the St. Louis County medical examiner and obtained by the Post-Dispatch, provide the most detailed description to date of the wounds Brown sustained in a confrontation Aug. 9 with Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson.
Advertisement: Story Continues Below
A source with knowledge of Wilson’s statements said the officer had told investigators that Brown had struggled for Wilson’s pistol inside a police SUV and that Wilson had fired the gun twice, hitting Brown once in the hand. Later, Wilson fired additional shots that killed Brown and ignited a national controversy.
The St. Louis medical examiner, Dr. Michael Graham, who is not part of the official investigation, reviewed the autopsy report for the newspaper. He said Tuesday that it “does support that there was a significant altercation at the car.”
Graham said the examination indicated a shot traveled from the tip of Brown’s right thumb toward his wrist. The official report notes an absence of stippling, powder burns around a wound that indicate a shot fired at relatively short range.
But Graham said, “Sometimes when it’s really close, such as within an inch or so, there is no stipple, just smoke.”
The report on a supplemental microscopic exam of tissue from the thumb wound showed foreign matter “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm.”
Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco, said the autopsy “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has gunpowder particulate material in the wound.” She added, “If he has his hand near the gun when it goes off, he’s going for the officer’s gun.”
Sources told the Post-Dispatch that Brown’s blood had been found on Wilson’s gun.
Melinek also said the autopsy did not support witnesses who have claimed Brown was shot while running away from Wilson, or with his hands up.
She said Brown was facing Wilson when Brown took a shot to the forehead, two shots to the chest and a shot to the upper right arm. The wound to the top of Brown’s head would indicate he was falling forward or in a lunging position toward the shooter; the shot was instantly fatal.
A sixth shot that hit the forearm traveled from the back of the arm to the inner arm, which means Brown’s palms could not have been facing Wilson, as some witnesses have said, Melinek said. That trajectory shows Brown probably was not taking a standard surrender position with arms above the shoulders and palms out when he was hit, she said.
The county medical examiner, Dr. Mary Case, could not be reached. The assistant who performed the autopsy, Dr. Gershom Norfleet, relayed word that he would not comment.
That post mortem, conducted the morning after Brown’s death, comports in most ways with the findings of a private autopsy arranged by Brown’s family and made public Aug. 18.
In that one, Dr. Michael M. Baden, a nationally known forensic pathologist, said none of Brown’s wounds appeared to have been from shots fired at close range.
Baden noted then that there was no gunshot residue on the body, so it appeared to him that the muzzle of the weapon was at least one or two feet away. He said, “It could have been 30 feet away.”
A third autopsy was ordered by federal officials as part of their separate investigation of the shooting. Results of that one have not been revealed.
The county and private autopsies agree on the number and location of the wounds.
The official autopsy also confirmed that tissue from Brown was found on the exterior of the driver’s side of Wilson’s vehicle.
“Someone got an injury that tore off skin and left it on the car,” Graham said. “That fits with everything else that came out. There’s blood in the car, now skin on the car, that shows something happened right there.”
The accompanying toxicology report shows he had been using marijuana.
Those documents, prepared by the St. Louis County medical examiner and obtained by the Post-Dispatch, provide the most detailed description to date of the wounds Brown sustained in a confrontation Aug. 9 with Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson.
Advertisement: Story Continues Below
A source with knowledge of Wilson’s statements said the officer had told investigators that Brown had struggled for Wilson’s pistol inside a police SUV and that Wilson had fired the gun twice, hitting Brown once in the hand. Later, Wilson fired additional shots that killed Brown and ignited a national controversy.
The St. Louis medical examiner, Dr. Michael Graham, who is not part of the official investigation, reviewed the autopsy report for the newspaper. He said Tuesday that it “does support that there was a significant altercation at the car.”
Graham said the examination indicated a shot traveled from the tip of Brown’s right thumb toward his wrist. The official report notes an absence of stippling, powder burns around a wound that indicate a shot fired at relatively short range.
But Graham said, “Sometimes when it’s really close, such as within an inch or so, there is no stipple, just smoke.”
The report on a supplemental microscopic exam of tissue from the thumb wound showed foreign matter “consistent with products that are discharged from the barrel of a firearm.”
Dr. Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco, said the autopsy “supports the fact that this guy is reaching for the gun, if he has gunpowder particulate material in the wound.” She added, “If he has his hand near the gun when it goes off, he’s going for the officer’s gun.”
Sources told the Post-Dispatch that Brown’s blood had been found on Wilson’s gun.
Melinek also said the autopsy did not support witnesses who have claimed Brown was shot while running away from Wilson, or with his hands up.
She said Brown was facing Wilson when Brown took a shot to the forehead, two shots to the chest and a shot to the upper right arm. The wound to the top of Brown’s head would indicate he was falling forward or in a lunging position toward the shooter; the shot was instantly fatal.
A sixth shot that hit the forearm traveled from the back of the arm to the inner arm, which means Brown’s palms could not have been facing Wilson, as some witnesses have said, Melinek said. That trajectory shows Brown probably was not taking a standard surrender position with arms above the shoulders and palms out when he was hit, she said.
The county medical examiner, Dr. Mary Case, could not be reached. The assistant who performed the autopsy, Dr. Gershom Norfleet, relayed word that he would not comment.
That post mortem, conducted the morning after Brown’s death, comports in most ways with the findings of a private autopsy arranged by Brown’s family and made public Aug. 18.
In that one, Dr. Michael M. Baden, a nationally known forensic pathologist, said none of Brown’s wounds appeared to have been from shots fired at close range.
Baden noted then that there was no gunshot residue on the body, so it appeared to him that the muzzle of the weapon was at least one or two feet away. He said, “It could have been 30 feet away.”
A third autopsy was ordered by federal officials as part of their separate investigation of the shooting. Results of that one have not been revealed.
The county and private autopsies agree on the number and location of the wounds.
The official autopsy also confirmed that tissue from Brown was found on the exterior of the driver’s side of Wilson’s vehicle.
“Someone got an injury that tore off skin and left it on the car,” Graham said. “That fits with everything else that came out. There’s blood in the car, now skin on the car, that shows something happened right there.”
Hazydat620
Well-Known Member
Are you blind, thick, stupid, deaf, what is it? People are getting treated differently as we speak based on the color of their skin, and you want more of it, you want more rights to do the segregating yourselves, are you so scared that people of other color are so much better than you, you need ways to hold them down, what for your own prosperity and preservation? That's fucking sad, better yourself instead of trying to hold someone else back.
ChesusRice
Well-Known Member
That is the problem when these things happen. racists come out of the woodwork to defend "their" people
It happened in the Martin case which was a case of Murder
and it is happening in this case Where it was a justified shooting
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Why doesn't everyone just hate on the pigs regardless of skin colour?
I'm glad our pigs don't have guns.