Nothing dumber than a flat earther

Status
Not open for further replies.
waterproof808 said:
Your head is what’s dense. A steel ball does not fall faster than a rubber ball. That’s an easily verifiable experiment I bet you have never done. All three would fall at the same speed if you remove air from the equation. These are indisputable facts and if you deny it you truly are a retarded ape who does not deserve to be engaged with.
Click to expand...
bongsmilie LOL !! If you remove air from the equation? The earth has air. Does it not? The intellect in which you Globetards use to convey your thoughts leaves a lot to be desired. You use immature insults and profanity. It hits a nerve when I show the facts that outer space is a fairy tale. :D Hydrogen gas would rise to the top of the atmosphere faster than helium why? Because it is less dense than helium. Heavier and more dense objects of the same size FALL FASTER. Gravity is only a theory. A idiotic and impossible theory at that. Do you Globetards know the difference between THEORY and LAW? Obviously, unequivocally NO !! :dunce:
 
spek9 said:
I haven't seen any facts presented that space is a fairy tale at all. Since you literally can not provide any concrete facts, isn't your opinion just a theory?
Click to expand...
Theories square with the principles of science and are therefore quantifiable.

His drivel doesn't even rise to the level of serious hypothesis because nearly all of it is laughably wrong.
 
Rrog said:
You discount the concept of gravity in its entirety. That allows your small mind to then bend the rest of physics and math.

Reading you using science terms is profane. You have no business speaking these terms.
Click to expand...
Why do you continue to waste the precious limited moments of your life on this clown? Is it the entertainment value? I'm genuinely curious.
 
Where are the barriers that create the "vacuum" of space? It must be some where between here and the moon which is only 250,000 miles away. :dunce: So they say. LOL !! You have to have airtight barriers to create a vacuum. Did the astroNOTS break through the invisible barrier and reseal it behind them on the way to the moon? LOL !!! GLOBETARDS. :dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce:
 
ttystikk said:
Theories square with the principles of science and are therefore quantifiable.

His drivel doesn't even rise to the level of serious hypothesis because nearly all of it is laughably wrong.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm completely aware of that. I was simply pointing out that the claim of having "facts" is ridiculous (in context of space being a fairy tale), and relating what he said back to his understanding of his claims of gravity.
 
RetiredGuerilla said:
bongsmilie LOL !! If you remove air from the equation? The earth has air. Does it not?
Click to expand...

A thing called “air friction” exists that acts upon incredibly light objects like a feather or piece of cotton. Try dropping a crumpled paper ball and a flat sheet of paper at the same time and see which lands first. Why would the crumpled ball land first when they both have the same mass?

Seems like you are just being purposely dim here.
 
ttystikk said:
Theories square with the principles of science and are therefore quantifiable.

His drivel doesn't even rise to the level of serious hypothesis because nearly all of it is laughably wrong.
Click to expand...
bongsmilie Dude, quantifiable means able to be measured as a quantity. Please expand on the principles of science you mentioned. Sounds like it will amount to a large pile of excrement if its "quantifiable". Planets and outer space. LOL !!! Hocus-pocus.
 
Last edited:
waterproof808 said:
A thing called “air friction” exists that acts upon incredibly light objects like a feather or piece of cotton. Try dropping a crumpled paper ball and a flat sheet of paper at the same time and see which lands first. Why would the crumpled ball land first when they both have the same mass?

Seems like you are just being purposely dim here.
Click to expand...
A flat sheet of paper creates wind resistance or drag due to it's shape. Is it you who is dim?
 
waterproof808 said:
A thing called “air friction” exists that acts upon incredibly light objects like a feather or piece of cotton. Try dropping a crumpled paper ball and a flat sheet of paper at the same time and see which lands first. Why would the crumpled ball land first when they both have the same mass?

Seems like you are just being purposely dim here.
Click to expand...
He's remarkably consistent at being wrong, too- much like a poor Trump supporter who has a problem with brown people.
 
RetiredGuerilla said:
A flat sheet of paper creates wind resistance or drag due to it's shape. Is it you who is dim?
Click to expand...
Lmao, so you do understand why a cotton ball would fall slower than a rubber ball? But a rubber ball and steel ball or a paper clip would all fall exactly the same. It’s funny how you pretend to understand physics but ignore it when it threatens your confirmation bias.
 
ttystikk said:
Theories square with the principles of science and are therefore quantifiable.

His drivel doesn't even rise to the level of serious hypothesis because nearly all of it is laughably wrong.
Click to expand...
So heavier objects fall the same speed as lighter objects, of the same size? Very sad actually. You lying to yourself that is. :dunce:
 
waterproof808 said:
Lmao, so you do understand why a cotton ball would fall slower than a rubber ball? But a rubber ball and steel ball or a paper clip would all fall exactly the same. It’s funny how you pretend to understand physics but ignore it when it threatens your confirmation bias.
Click to expand...
This is why he's a waste of your time.

The minute he said science wasn't quantifiable, I was done with him.

Everything we take for granted in modern Life is quantifiable, from the capacity of your cellphone battery to the horsepower generated by your automobile engine. If someone questions that after setting an appointment by phone and then driving to it, then there's just no reasoning with them.

There are a few things in life that are real but not quantifiable. Love is one; your girlfriend loves you, but exactly how much? Three yards? Twenty Watts? Half a thimbleful? The one thing all these non quantifiable commodities have in common is that we DON'T use them in science or engineering.

Would YOU walk on a bridge suspended high above the ground, knowing it was constructed with sixteen oodles of love?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top