cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Secular = no magicSo it's safe to say you don't like religion? Does that include secular humanism?
Humanism = no god
Don't you need at least one of the above for a religion? cn
Secular = no magicSo it's safe to say you don't like religion? Does that include secular humanism?
Very true. It's wild to me how blind faith is taken as a virtue.What if is different than "faith." I go what if all the time. Faith is believing the what if is a fact. That's dangerous.
Fair enough. As long as you realize that your educated opinion is no better in terms of correctness, in this instance, than their faith, then you have your head screwed on straight. For in their mind, it's safe to assume that they think their opinion is educated as well, else they would be stupid.I can't completely disagree with you. I'm an Atheist, and as such I simply feel that there is no evidence to support the notion of a deity. Do I know my position to be fact? No I don't. I also don't believe in Santa Clause, the Tooth Fairy, or Gremlins. Can I prove that they aren't real? Nope, unfortunately I can't. But, I can form an educated opinion on the subject using facts, science, and common sense.
I do however believe that the burden of proof lays squarely on the person making the claim. If someone can come up with one shred of proof about the talking snake, the virgin mother, and the subsequent zombie fairy she gave birth to, then I will revisit my opinion on this. Until then, it sounds like a lot of hocus pocus to me ...... but as you rightly pointed out, I could be wrong.
Fair enough. As long as you realize that your educated opinion is no better in terms of correctness, in this instance, than their faith, then you have your head screwed on straight. For in their mind, it's safe to assume that they think their opinion is educated as well, else they would be stupid.
I'm not advocating any religion, but I'm 100% for individuals being able to choose their religion, as long as it doesn't result in them infringing upon another.
I just think it's comical that people who don't believe in a god, think people who do believe in a god are stupid, as well as vice versa, when in fact neither side can be proven correct or incorrect. Basically people need to grow up and make up their mind of what THEY want to believe, and let others do the same without ridicule.
I hold a comparable view. i am irreligious but not antireligious. One ethic I share with most religious doctrines is to place a very high value on hospitality. cnI'm pretty much with you on this. I have met plenty of people far more intelligent than I that believe in a god.
This is where I'm 100% with you: "I'm not advocating any religion, but I'm 100% for individuals being able to choose their religion, as long as it doesn't result in them infringing upon another."
I apply that to pretty much anything in life. Drugs, religion, marriage, etc. So long as it does no harm to others, I don't really care what other people do or believe.
I'm pretty much with you on this. I have met plenty of people far more intelligent than I that believe in a god.
This is where I'm 100% with you: "I'm not advocating any religion, but I'm 100% for individuals being able to choose their religion, as long as it doesn't result in them infringing upon another."
I apply that to pretty much anything in life. Drugs, religion, marriage, etc. So long as it does no harm to others, I don't really care what other people do or believe.
No, that would be retarded. Oh! Yeah.............So it's safe to say you think the flintstones was based on a true story?
The question was asked of the anti-religionists. The question is: Do humanists equate their beliefs with a religion?Typically not. I can't believe those that adhere to laws purported to be from the sole deity would ever equate their beliefs with Humanism.
Sad part is, he really believes this.
No, secular humanists substitute man for a god.Secular = no magic Humanism = no god Don't you need at least one of the above for a religion? cn
Sad part is, he really believes this.
Never said anything of the sort. You are clueless as to what I believe.Even sadder is you believe this.
Never said anything of the sort. You are clueless as to what I believe.
Even sadder is you believe this.
So where did I claim to be a Christian? You assume too much.
Not correct. Humanists will not put up with Revealed Doctrine, which only the religious will do. cnNo, secular humanists substitute man for a god.
Then you have no clue what secular humanism is about. Life is about competition. But what fun is an easy win? It would be like the Detroit Tigers going against the little league champions. Possibly the Tigers would be the champions.No, secular humanists substitute man for a god.
You can be a secular humanist and a social Darwinist. The latter definitely do not fight for the weakest. Over them maybe, but not for. cnThen you have no clue what secular humanism is about. Life is about competition. But what fun is an easy win? It would be like the Detroit Tigers going against the little league champions. Possibly the Tigers would be the champions.
That's what being a secular humanist is all about. We fight for the weakest against those who would abuse them.
It has nothing to do with god. God is just a crutch for fools who are too scared to accept nothing at all may happen when you die.
Secular humanism and social Darwinism are mutually exclusive. Social Darwinism puts us on the same play field as the lower animals, secular humanism says we're different and have a moral obligation to do no harm if we're able, not sit around and do nothing.You can be a secular humanist and a social Darwinist. The latter definitely do not fight for the weakest. Over them maybe, but not for. cn