Piers Morgan: Bible is flawed, time to amend a new one

HotCheetos

Well-Known Member
[SUP]Revelation 22:18-21
18 [/SUP]For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
[SUP]19 [/SUP]And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
[SUP]20 [/SUP]He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
[SUP]21 [/SUP]The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.

Jude 1:17 onwards
[SUP]17 [/SUP]But you must remember, beloved, the predictions of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ. [SUP]18 [/SUP]They[SUP][f][/SUP] said to you, “In the last time there will be scoffers, following their own ungodly passions.” [SUP]19 [/SUP]It is these who cause divisions, worldly people, devoid of the Spirit. [SUP]20 [/SUP]But you, beloved, building yourselves up in your most holy faith and praying in the Holy Spirit, [SUP]21 [/SUP]keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ that leads to eternal life.[SUP]22 [/SUP]And have mercy on those who doubt; [SUP]23 [/SUP]save others by snatching them out of the fire; to others show mercy with fear, hating even the garment[SUP][g][/SUP] stained by the flesh.

Just what something needs to be "correct:" Additions from Piers Morgan. His name sounds like a California porn chick's "industry name."
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Secular humanism and social Darwinism are mutually exclusive. Social Darwinism puts us on the same play field as the lower animals, secular humanism says we're different and have a moral obligation to do no harm if we're able, not sit around and do nothing.
Perhaps we need to distinguish between secular humanism, which is as protean as atheism, and Secular Humanism which is a distinct structured philosophical outlook. The latter is harder to reconcile with social Darwinism, but I see that SH overlaps with Utilitarianism, which can indeed be forced into a defense of social Darwinism. I disagree that SD necessarily places us even with the lower animals (does this mean invertebrates, excluding some molluscs?); the higher, fur-bearing ones get to play as well. Jmo. cn
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Then you have no clue what secular humanism is about. Life is about competition. But what fun is an easy win? It would be like the Detroit Tigers going against the little league champions. Possibly the Tigers would be the champions. That's what being a secular humanist is all about. We fight for the weakest against those who would abuse them. It has nothing to do with god. God is just a crutch for fools who are too scared to accept nothing at all may happen when you die.
Secular humanism is about the Detroit Tigers? I haven't found secular humanists to be about "fighting for the weakest" at all. They seem mostly concerned with imposing their will on others
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
dude, you damned me to hell for trolling you, it's 100% clear that you believe in magic sky place and bad burning place down below.
Not true, nowhere have I damned you to Hell. You telling me what I believe is just ludicrous.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Secular humanism is about the Detroit Tigers? I haven't found secular humanists to be about "fighting for the weakest" at all. They seem mostly concerned with imposing their will on others
kind of like how you impose your bigotry on gays to deny them equality?
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Secular humanism is about the Detroit Tigers? I haven't found secular humanists to be about "fighting for the weakest" at all. They seem mostly concerned with imposing their will on others
Secular Humanists are the only atheists against abortion. Some imposing their will. Aren't you pro-life too?
 
Top