DIY-HP-LED
Well-Known Member
Bill musta had a tough time on the fairway, dunno for sure but I figure he practices a bit, but I too lose it at times, though not over a fucking golf ball!

Bill musta had a tough time on the fairway, dunno for sure but I figure he practices a bit, but I too lose it at times, though not over a fucking golf ball!
let's be completely honest though really. extremists on both sides love violence in the name of politics. i'm sick of it.
antifa jumps couple
Yes, because he is using a deadly weapon with intent, and had plenty means of escape (not imminent danger), but he chose to shoot instead.
if it was intentionally and there was no danger or threat, yes. For example: if a soldier intentionally shot and killed a civilian, who is sitting at a table eating, that would be murder. There are rules of engagement and international laws that limit the targets of soldiers and tactical goals during a time of war.Using your loose definition of murder would you say soldiers that kill are mostly murderers ? Just curious.
Trump meets the criteria for second degree mass murder under federal law according to expert legal opinion. This is not a philosophical discussion, but one of law and facts. One that I can back up with expert opinion and he will quote you the relevant law from the USC if you wish and can comprehend it.Using your loose definition of murder would you say soldiers that kill are mostly murderers ? Just curious.
I can think of someone.if it was intentionally and there was no danger or threat, yes. For example: if a soldier intentionally shot and killed a civilian, who is sitting at a table eating, that would be murder. There are rules of engagement and international laws that limit the targets of soldiers and tactical goals during a time of war.
That guy had plenty of opportunities to leave, but he chose to pull out a knife, which is also considered a deadly weapon. He's fucked.Yes, because he is using a deadly weapon with intent, and had plenty means of escape (not imminent danger), but he chose to shoot instead.
yikes.
No, they are soldiers who are doing their duty and enemy soldiers recognize that and they have a Geneva convention on POWs for that reason.Using your loose definition of murder would you say soldiers that kill are mostly murderers ? Just curious.
if it was intentionally and there was no danger or threat, yes. For example: if a soldier intentionally shot and killed a civilian, who is sitting at a table eating, that would be murder. There are rules of engagement and international laws that limit the targets of soldiers and tactical goals.
100,00 years ago the chief of the tribe would have given you a death sentence by turfing your ass out and you would have died alone in the wilderness, humans cannot survive outside of a social context. That's what they did for antisocial behavior, if you were an outcast all the neighboring tribes knew what you were. There are no real individuals, that is a myth, there are communities, individuals are lonely and unhappy and exist outside the circle of caring and sharing that most normal humans crave and need. The cult of the individual is just libertarian bullshit, not a real thing, hermits live alone the spiritual ones have a plan, a practice and lead disciplined lives, others like those in the west are just mentally ill.All politics is systemically based in violence or the threat of it for noncompliance.
He was THREATENED, cornered, punched, and surrounded by more people hitting him. In order to charge someone, you need intent. The guy verbally threatened him, and intentionally punched him in the head, then the other guy had to defend himself from imminent danger. But yes, each of those individuals who were involved committing a crime are fucked.That guy had plenty of opportunities to leave, but he chose to pull out a knife, which is also considered a deadly weapon. He's fucked.
Shit happens when you drop bombs, it could be worse, like the Russians and not give a fuck about it, just bullshit it away with propaganda.So the term "collateral damage" is just a bullshit term for "oops we murdered some innocent people" ?
Its war. Death and Injury happen.So the term "collateral damage" is just a bullshit term for "oops we murdered some innocent people" ?
He has an excellent case in court, if he shot a half dozen of them he'd have as good a case, but would just be charged for having the gun in DC, not using it in such circumstances. Good luck getting a conviction out of a DC jury over that one, the DA won't even try.He was THREATENED, cornered, punched, and surrounded by more people hitting him. In order to charge someone, you need intent. The guy verbally threatened him, and intentionally punched him in the head, then the other guy had to defend himself from imminent danger. But yes, each of those individuals who were involved committing a crime are fucked.
cuckThat guy had plenty of opportunities to leave, but he chose to pull out a knife, which is also considered a deadly weapon. He's fucked.