Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
Ron Paul doesn't have a snow ball's chance in Hell of becoming King of Amerika. His last batshit crazy statement about the civil rights act pretty much put the nail in the coffin.
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This is why MSNBC says hes a racist (and yea it is only MSNBC that ran this twisted shit initially)
[/FONT]
[FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]On June 4, 2004, Congress hailed the 40th anniversary of the 1964 Act. Only the heroic Ron Paul dissented. Here are his comments.[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Mr. Speaker, I rise to explain my objection to H.Res. 676. I certainly join my colleagues in urging Americans to celebrate the progress this country has made in race relations. However, contrary to the claims of the supporters of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the sponsors of H.Res. 676, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom. Instead, the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty. [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over the hiring, employee relations, and customer service practices of every business in the country. The result was a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrocks of free society. The federal government has no legitimate authority to infringe on the rights of private property owners to use their property as they please and to form (or not form) contracts with terms mutually agreeable to all parties. The rights of all private property owners, even those whose actions decent people find abhorrent, must be respected if we are to maintain a free society. [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]This expansion of federal power was based on an erroneous interpretation of the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. The framers of the Constitution intended the interstate commerce clause to create a free trade zone among the states, not to give the federal government regulatory power over every business that has any connection with interstate commerce. [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]The Civil Rights Act of 1964 not only violated the Constitution and reduced individual liberty; it also failed to achieve its stated goals of promoting racial harmony and a color-blind society. Federal bureaucrats and judges cannot read minds to see if actions are motivated by racism. Therefore, the only way the federal government could ensure an employer was not violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was to ensure that the racial composition of a business's workforce matched the racial composition of a bureaucrat or judge's defined body of potential employees. Thus, bureaucrats began forcing employers to hire by racial quota. Racial quotas have not contributed to racial harmony or advanced the goal of a color-blind society. Instead, these quotas encouraged racial balkanization, and fostered racial strife. [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]Of course, America has made great strides in race relations over the past forty years. However, this progress is due to changes in public attitudes and private efforts. Relations between the races have improved despite, not because of, the 1964 Civil Rights Act. [/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, while I join the sponsors of H.Res. 676 in promoting racial harmony and individual liberty, the fact is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not accomplish these goals. Instead, this law unconstitutionally expanded federal power, thus reducing liberty. Furthermore, by prompting raced-based quotas, this law undermined efforts to achieve a color-blind society and increased racial strife. Therefore, I must oppose H.Res. 676.
[/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman, Times, serif]LondonFrog - This is why people talk about "Freedom" when they talk about Ron Paul - Ron Paul stands by the people and our founders 100% - - one of the few politicians that speak on behalf of our founders and the people. You really think the Civil Rights Act Waved its magic wand and ended racism? That is what he is saying here, he is saying there could of been integration done in a better way, without violating peoples rights. Real Simple. Be careful what you read or see in the mainstream media.
[/FONT]
exactly...The Repukes would never give him the nod anyway, but if they did he would get creamed in the generals by Obama for those comments...Ron Paul doesn't have a snow ball's chance in Hell of becoming King of Amerika. His last batshit crazy statement about the civil rights act pretty much put the nail in the coffin.
no he wouldn't assuming most people actually read the speech and don't watch MSNBC and that rumors dont get spread, unlike you. Lets hope your in the minority and that the truth is told, I know I got Ron Pauls back, I hope people like you become the laughing stock you deserve to be treated like for calling that racist. Your the racist here if you actually read the speech your sir are the racist if you deem this as racism. Its common effin sense that's what it is. Please read the speech posted above.exactly...The Repukes would never give him the nod anyway, but if they did he would get creamed in the generals by Obama for those comments...
calm your happy high azz down...Ron Paul want even make it out the primaries...care to wager??? and you use the word racist more then anyone...I disagree with his views on the 64 civil rights vote..period...and he also thought it was unnessary to send the seals to get Osama....WTF...somebody put Grandpa to bed with a warm glass of fiber and prunesno he wouldn't assuming most people actually read the speech and don't watch MSNBC and that rumors dont get spread, unlike you. Lets hope your in the minority and that the truth is told, I know I got Ron Pauls back, I hope people like you become the laughing stock you deserve to be treated like for calling that racist. Your the racist here if you actually read the speech your sir are the racist if you deem this as racism. Its common sense thats what it is.
Oh but you're wrong. Because you are not for Ron Paul therefore your eyes and ears don't work properly, so, those who do follow Ron Paul must tell you what he said. Forget that you watched the interview in it's entirety. Forget that you have an independent mind capable of working things out for yourself. You are wrong because THEY said so. Oh, and you're un-American. Yep. Did I miss anything?exactly...The Repukes would never give him the nod anyway, but if they did he would get creamed in the generals by Obama for those comments...
if anyone is "the chosen one" or the "messiah" (heard those lately?), i would have to say it is ron paul.Oh but you're wrong. Because you are not for Ron Paul therefore your eyes and ears don't work properly, so, those who do follow Ron Paul must tell you what he said. Forget that you watched the interview in it's entirety. Forget that you have an independent mind capable of working things out for yourself. You are wrong because THEY said so. Oh, and you're un-American. Yep. Did I miss anything?
yup I'm a ceo.... what is anti-human ????? better still explain what it is to be socialist....eugenics----have you been listening to Alex Jones..is that whats the problem...are you an Alex Jones fanyea your probably some kind of satanist or something else that is anti-human that or socialist, maybe you believe in eugenics also idk whats your deal? are you guys ceo's?
yea ill be sure to use the underground railroad when people start not allowing whites in their shop because of what ron paul said about civil rights act. Are you proud of supporting economic slavery? Are you proud to support the wars? the drug war? the drug war is the most racist shit there is.good luck with your Freedom ... maybe you can follow the underground railroad of Harriet Tubman...WTF