See this yet? "Pharmaceutical Grade Cannabis"

cephalopod

Well-Known Member
GW ring a bell to anyone? Federally directed wtf, alarm bells should be ringing. When was the funeral for democracy and liberty? I heard some politicians shot'em dead.
 

bob harris

Well-Known Member
i heard from Rep Callton last night, this is a FEDERALLY Directed Bill, not one directed to the state of Mi. It is a waste of time and space to discuss this bill.
I'm confused..thought it was a State bill. Is the fed making it schedule 2?
 

kindfarms420

Active Member
its gotta be a state bill it says enacted by the STATE of MI right on the bill i would think if it was enacted by the feds it would say enacted by the federal gov or something like that
 

Beagle

Well-Known Member
Page 19
9 (K) AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL-GRADE CANNABIS
10 LICENSED FACILITIES, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE SELF REPORTING OF
11 INVENTORY ON A MONTHLY BASIS, SUBJECT TO INSPECTION BY DESIGNATED
12 STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES.
Page 24
2 (2) AT THE TIME OF FILING AN APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OR
3 RENEWAL OF A PHARMACEUTICAL-GRADE CANNABIS LICENSED FACILITY
4 LICENSE, AN APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A SET OF HIS OR HER
5 FINGERPRINTS AND FILE PERSONAL HISTORY INFORMATION CONCERNING THE
6 PERSON'S QUALIFICATIONS FOR A LICENSE UNDER THIS ARTICLE. THE
7 DEPARTMENT SHALL SUBMIT THE FINGERPRINTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
8 STATE POLICE FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING FINGERPRINT-BASED
9 CRIMINAL HISTORY CHECKS. THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL
10 FORWARD THE FINGERPRINTS TO THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
11 FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING FINGERPRINT-BASED CRIMINAL HISTORY
12 CHECKS.
Page 28
1 (D) ALLOW UNANNOUNCED INSPECTION OF ITS PREMISES DURING
2 REASONABLE BUSINESS HOURS BY ANY STATE, FEDERAL, OR LOCAL
3 GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AUTHORIZED TO INSPECT THE LICENSED FACILITY
4 UNDER THIS ARTICLE.
All of which pertain to these commercial grow facilities.

It is my belief that the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act 2008 was written the way it was for a reason. Patients can grow their own or appoint a caregiver to do it for them....limited number of plants, in no way reaching or exceeding 100 plants...limited weight, never exceeding 1LB...all of which to fly under the Federal radar.

If someone wants to start a commercial grow, let them get bent over Uncle Sams knee...they knew what they were getting into. Personally, I think there is enough Meds from caregiver/patient overages to supply the needs of dispensaries.
 

pharmacoping

Active Member
sounds like they're going to put an end to all of the caregiver grows that suck! might be a good thing for sick people, to know that when they get their meds form a legitimate source, someone serious enough to pay the 1500$, have their meds tested, and deemed pharma grade, that they wont die from all the mold these putas are putting out, not to mention all the shit weed form moms basement getting into the hands of legit patients?
 

bob harris

Well-Known Member
sounds like they're going to put an end to all of the caregiver grows that suck! might be a good thing for sick people, to know that when they get their meds form a legitimate source, someone serious enough to pay the 1500$, have their meds tested, and deemed pharma grade, that they wont die from all the mold these putas are putting out, not to mention all the shit weed form moms basement getting into the hands of legit patients?
They ARE trying to get rid of 'care givers". And it is a good thing.

"care givers" are are comprised of two groups. Th real care givers..helping patients and making little if any money, and drug dealers, growing all the weed they can for profit and hiding behind a medical law.

The true care giver won't be affected much..he can still tend to his patients without going through the "pharmaceutical grade" hoops...the drug dealer kind, growing for quantity and profit, will have to conform to the "pharmaceutical grade" controls, or go completely illegal, that's a good thing
 

Beagle

Well-Known Member
They ARE trying to get rid of 'care givers". And it is a good thing.

"care givers" are are comprised of two groups. Th real care givers..helping patients and making little if any money, and drug dealers, growing all the weed they can for profit and hiding behind a medical law.

The true care giver won't be affected much..he can still tend to his patients without going through the "pharmaceutical grade" hoops...the drug dealer kind, growing for quantity and profit, will have to conform to the "pharmaceutical grade" controls, or go completely illegal, that's a good thing
In short, if you want to sell to dispensaries...get your pharmy license!
 

tomcatjones

Active Member
They ARE trying to get rid of 'care givers". And it is a good thing.

"care givers" are are comprised of two groups. Th real care givers..helping patients and making little if any money, and drug dealers, growing all the weed they can for profit and hiding behind a medical law.

The true care giver won't be affected much..he can still tend to his patients without going through the "pharmaceutical grade" hoops...the drug dealer kind, growing for quantity and profit, will have to conform to the "pharmaceutical grade" controls, or go completely illegal, that's a good thing
Bob... you are the one who is using non-edible crop plant growth regulators....

YOU fall into the category of drug-dealer growing all the weed they can.. because you sure aren't producing medicine.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
All the scaremongers miss this part?:

(2) THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT PREVENT A QUALIFYING PATIENT OR A3 PRIMARY CAREGIVER FROM ENGAGING IN ANY ACTIVITY THAT IS LAWFUL
4 UNDER THE MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA ACT. THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT5 AFFECT AND IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE MICHIGAN MEDICAL
6 MARIHUANA ACT
 

tomcatjones

Active Member
All the scaremongers miss this part?:

(2) THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT PREVENT A QUALIFYING PATIENT OR A3 PRIMARY CAREGIVER FROM ENGAGING IN ANY ACTIVITY THAT IS LAWFUL
4 UNDER THE MICHIGAN MEDICAL MARIHUANA ACT. THIS ARTICLE DOES NOT5 AFFECT AND IS NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE MICHIGAN MEDICAL
6 MARIHUANA ACT

correct...

which does not allow for SALES as per their interpretation (cg2p is alive and well)

you read the part where PHARMACEUTICAL GRADE CANNABIS can be bought or sold in this state?
 

bob harris

Well-Known Member
Bob... you are the one who is using non-edible crop plant growth regulators....

YOU fall into the category of drug-dealer growing all the weed they can.. because you sure aren't producing medicine.
What??? I'm totally organic..and I grow way less than I could..
 

Beagle

Well-Known Member
Page 13
22 (4) "ELIGIBLE PATIENT" MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO MEETS THE
23 REQUIREMENTS OF PART 84 AND HAS BEEN ISSUED AN ENHANCED
24 PHARMACEUTICAL-GRADE CANNABIS REGISTRATION CARD.
25 (5) "ENHANCED PHARMACEUTICAL-GRADE CANNABIS REGISTRATION
26 CARD" MEANS THE REGISTRATION CARD ISSUED TO AN ELIGIBLE PATIENT
27 UNDER PART 84.
I still don't understand why a patient would need an enhanced card...
 
So does nobody see this as a way to make a lot of money, a little more legit? To be a more legit business. I mean anyone willing to do all of this should have a major step in the rest. If I had the money after a lot more research with a lawyer, I am in. My pharm tech cert may finally pay off. lol I also have budtender experience if anyone needs on in the meantime. ;
)

Edit. It is similar to the dispensary laws in AZ. Which I found to be good from a business stand point, and honestly this one reads better.
 
Top