This one is easy.
"Democrats led by Governor Brown were able to speed up the budgeting process, pushing
through painful cuts. However, with a two-thirds majority they were not able to match those cuts
with the tax increases that were necessary to actually balance the budget."
and they did both by changing the 2/3 rule to 1/2 for budget approval, but which cuts/increases are never specified.
They were really looking to represent the largest percentage of California voters that way.
Otherwise, the 2nd tech bubble (Jesus, look @ Frisco real estate), congressional redistricting, etc.
Again, these are gov't PROJECTIONS that can't be proved to be correct until they've been history for years, but gov't has never lied to its constituents before, right?